fix(start): correct organizer panel semantics - #640
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 16 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (6)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Action performedReview finished.
|
|
Independent review: LGTM at exact base Verified the exact six-file diff and live review-thread state (no unresolved threads). The check-in landing now owns an instructional The local component APIs are narrowly route-owned and children/prop semantics are appropriate. Tests prove labelled-region/ Local validation: focused 2/2; full wodsmith-start 2,957/2,957; Start type-check; changed-file Biome (only the pre-existing non-null-assertion warning at |
d6316c1
into
codex/ui-crew-token-series-coverage
Summary
noopener noreferrerand anh2page headingWhy
The check-in screen is instructional content, not an empty collection, and the missing score-entry-data branch is an actionable error, not an empty state. Correcting those categories before the broader EmptyState migration prevents the shared abstraction from encoding the wrong semantics.
Stack
codex/ui-crew-token-series-coverage(PR docs(ui): capture Crew token and series coverage #638)8717ec9d70aca1f07bebad48d6e86160b81ffddaValidation
lat checkgit diff --checkmainSummary by cubic
Corrects organizer panel semantics and aligns empty states with shared UI primitives. Adds a compact
@repo/ui/metricpattern and migrates summary previews; cleans up Start admin headings and link hydration.Bug Fixes
CheckInInstructionswith anh2and safe new‑tab kiosk link.ResultsLoadErrorwith a working router‑invalidate retry.h1on the dashboard, and fixed demo competitions headings.Refactors
@repo/ui/empty-stateacross organizer UIs;OrganizerEmptyStatenow composes it and preserves actions.@repo/ui/metric; migrated import/preview summaries (combined imports, volunteers, heats, templates, copy‑prior‑event) and added a Storybook story.Written for commit d6316c1. Summary will update on new commits.