Require explicit is_strict declarations for ScalarFnVTable - #9007
Require explicit is_strict declarations for ScalarFnVTable#9007connortsui20 wants to merge 1 commit into
is_strict declarations for ScalarFnVTable#90071 benchmark regressed
⚠️ Different runtime environments detected
Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.
⚡ 4 improved benchmarks
❌ 1 regressed benchmark
✅ 1844 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 46 skipped benchmarks1
Warning
Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | Simulation | true_count_vortex_buffer[1024] |
773.1 ns | 860.6 ns | -10.17% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | copy_nullable[65536] |
1,033.1 µs | 568.1 µs | +81.85% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | copy_non_nullable[65536] |
1,111.6 µs | 799.7 µs | +39.01% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | canonicalize[1024, 8] |
19.7 µs | 17.7 µs | +11.36% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | canonicalize[256, 8] |
19.7 µs | 17.8 µs | +11.01% |
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing agent/require-explicit-strictness (04ad255) with agent/rename-scalar-fn-strictness (60b7f57)2
Footnotes
-
46 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩
-
No successful run was found on
agent/rename-scalar-fn-strictness(a3494a5) during the generation of this report, so c7ea501 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩