Skip to content

feat(validate): adds via and viaOnly restrictions to reachable rules #1041

Draft
sverweij wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
feature/add-via-and-via-only-restrictions-to-reachable-rules
Draft

feat(validate): adds via and viaOnly restrictions to reachable rules #1041
sverweij wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
feature/add-via-and-via-only-restrictions-to-reachable-rules

Conversation

@sverweij
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@sverweij sverweij commented Jan 5, 2026

Description

  • feat(schema): adds 'via' and 'viaOnly' attributes to reachable restrictions
  • feat(validate): enables the use of 'via' and 'viaOnly' in reachable restrictions
  • doc(rules): describe the 'via' and 'viaOnly' options for reachable restrictions

Motivation and Context

See #763

How Has This Been Tested?

  • green ci
  • additional automated non-regression tests

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Documentation only change
  • Refactor (non-breaking change which fixes an issue without changing functionality)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist

  • 📖

    • My change doesn't require a documentation update, or ...
    • it does and I have updated it
  • ⚖️

    • The contribution will be subject to The MIT license, and I'm OK with that.
    • The contribution is my own original work.
    • I am ok with the stuff in CONTRIBUTING.md.

@sverweij sverweij force-pushed the feature/add-via-and-via-only-restrictions-to-reachable-rules branch from 7b04401 to 6b468c0 Compare January 13, 2026 20:23
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@sverweij sverweij force-pushed the feature/add-via-and-via-only-restrictions-to-reachable-rules branch from 6b468c0 to b2a0c78 Compare April 15, 2026 18:46
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant