tools: add verified model artifact downloader; document gitignore intent - #11
Open
ayushnandi718-dev wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
tools: add verified model artifact downloader; document gitignore intent#11ayushnandi718-dev wants to merge 1 commit into
ayushnandi718-dev wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #7 (and helps #5)
The trained \model.bin\ is intentionally excluded from the repo, but the
reason was easy to miss. This PR:
published weights, verifies the SHA-256 documented in
\ irmware/esp32_llm/README.md, and writes them into \ irmware/model/.
Until the weights are released it prints a clear pointer to issue Is this real? You did a .gitignore on the most important bits! #7/Request: publish the trained model.bin (or upload to Hugging Face)? #5.
Verified locally: --check-only\ and unset-URL paths both behave as expected.