Skip to content

Document specification deviation exceptions#3445

Open
henriquejsza wants to merge 2 commits into
open-telemetry:mainfrom
henriquejsza:document-spec-deviation-exceptions
Open

Document specification deviation exceptions#3445
henriquejsza wants to merge 2 commits into
open-telemetry:mainfrom
henriquejsza:document-spec-deviation-exceptions

Conversation

@henriquejsza

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Closes #2097.

Summary

  • Document that GC-approved specification exceptions may apply during stability review.
  • Update the stabilization review template so requesters disclose approved deviations and user-facing documentation.

Testing

  • npx cspell --config .cspell.yaml guides/contributor/processes.md .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/stabilization-review.md
  • git diff --check
  • docker run --rm --mount \"type=bind,source=$(pwd),target=/home/repo\" -e GITHUB_TOKEN lycheeverse/lychee:sha-8222559@sha256:6f49010cc46543af3b765f19d5319c0cdd4e8415d7596e1b401d5b4cec29c799 --config home/repo/.lychee.toml --root-dir /home/repo --verbose home/repo/guides/contributor/processes.md home/repo/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/stabilization-review.md

Clarify how GC-approved specification deviations are handled during stability reviews so requesters can disclose approved exceptions consistently.

Signed-off-by: henriquejsza <henriquejsza@gmail.com>
@linux-foundation-easycla

linux-foundation-easycla Bot commented May 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CLA Signed
The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

Update the managed asset entry to the current CNCF Open Community Groups URL so link validation succeeds.

Signed-off-by: henriquejsza <henriquejsza@gmail.com>
a TC stability review is a dialogue requiring engagement from both the TC and
language SDK maintainers.

### Specification deviations

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know if this is the right place to document this requirement. There is no requirement that a language implementation must request a TC review itself. And it feels a bit odd that TC is the one reviewing, but GC is the one approving the exemptions if any.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

How to handle explicit deviations to the spec?

2 participants