Skip to content

Paw Patrol WorkerRun en-019e0589-11d7-72a1-8218-dd6627c201f7 - #238

Open
rita-aga wants to merge 2 commits into
codex/paw-patrol-worker-reportingfrom
codex/paw-patrol-197d2620
Open

Paw Patrol WorkerRun en-019e0589-11d7-72a1-8218-dd6627c201f7#238
rita-aga wants to merge 2 commits into
codex/paw-patrol-worker-reportingfrom
codex/paw-patrol-197d2620

Conversation

@rita-aga

@rita-aga rita-aga commented May 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Created automatically by paw-codex-worker.

WorkerRun: en-019e0589-11d7-72a1-8218-dd6627c201f7
Worker: mac-mini-codex-prod
Base branch: codex/paw-patrol-worker-reporting
Head branch: codex/paw-patrol-197d2620
Worktree: /Users/openclaw/Development/temperpaw-worktrees/codex-paw-patrol-197d2620

Task:
You are the local Codex implementer for TemperPaw paw-patrol.

WorkRequest or legacy PatrolRequest: en-019e0588-e4d3-72f1-900a-d138197d2620
FactoryCase: en-019e0589-025d-7c60-8e9e-ee76785ccb66
WorkCycle: wc-019e0589-0acc-71f2-98c3-398685b5acf7
Summary: codex-live-proof: Live Paw Patrol review-rework proof after worker PR reuse fix. Only add or update this Markdown file: .proofs/mac-mini-r...

Request:
Live Paw Patrol review-rework proof after worker PR reuse fix. Only add or update this Markdown file: .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md.

Required sequence:

  1. First pass: create the file with a Mermaid diagram and exact marker REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: needs_changes. Do not include REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: fulfilled on the first pass.
  2. Reviewer should request changes while that marker is needs_changes.
  3. Rework pass: update the same file on the same branch, replace the marker with REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: fulfilled, and add one sentence saying reviewer-requested rework was fulfilled.
  4. Final proof mentions the WorkCycle, WorkerRun ids, ReviewRun ids, EvaluationRun, ProofPacket, and pull request if available.
  5. Use lightweight Markdown verification.

Required loop:

  1. Work in the assigned git worktree and branch.
  2. Follow red-green TDD before implementation.
  3. Keep orchestration Temper-native: entity specs, WASM integrations, and Cedar policies.
  4. Run focused tests and relevant live/E2E verification for touched behavior.
  5. Produce a visual ProofPacket with changed-files map, state diagram, tests, E2E evidence, risk notes, and OData links.
  6. Finish normally. The paw-codex-worker will report WorkerRun.ReportDone or WorkerRun.ReportFailed to Temper after the local Codex process exits.

Codex change evidence:

?? .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md
(no unstaged diff stat)

After this PR is reported to Temper, Patrol should run independent ReviewRun and EvaluationRun gates before human merge review.

rita-aga added 2 commits May 7, 2026 23:07
Created automatically by paw-codex-worker.

WorkerRun: `en-019e0589-11d7-72a1-8218-dd6627c201f7`
Worker: `mac-mini-codex-prod`
Base branch: `codex/paw-patrol-worker-reporting`
Head branch: `codex/paw-patrol-197d2620`
Worktree: `/Users/openclaw/Development/temperpaw-worktrees/codex-paw-patrol-197d2620`

Task:
You are the local Codex implementer for TemperPaw paw-patrol.

WorkRequest or legacy PatrolRequest: en-019e0588-e4d3-72f1-900a-d138197d2620
FactoryCase: en-019e0589-025d-7c60-8e9e-ee76785ccb66
WorkCycle: wc-019e0589-0acc-71f2-98c3-398685b5acf7
Summary: codex-live-proof: Live Paw Patrol review-rework proof after worker PR reuse fix. Only add or update this Markdown file: .proofs/mac-mini-r...

Request:
Live Paw Patrol review-rework proof after worker PR reuse fix. Only add or update this Markdown file: .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md.

Required sequence:
1. First pass: create the file with a Mermaid diagram and exact marker REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: needs_changes. Do not include REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: fulfilled on the first pass.
2. Reviewer should request changes while that marker is needs_changes.
3. Rework pass: update the same file on the same branch, replace the marker with REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: fulfilled, and add one sentence saying reviewer-requested rework was fulfilled.
4. Final proof mentions the WorkCycle, WorkerRun ids, ReviewRun ids, EvaluationRun, ProofPacket, and pull request if available.
5. Use lightweight Markdown verification.

Required loop:
1. Work in the assigned git worktree and branch.
2. Follow red-green TDD before implementation.
3. Keep orchestration Temper-native: entity specs, WASM integrations, and Cedar policies.
4. Run focused tests and relevant live/E2E verification for touched behavior.
5. Produce a visual ProofPacket with changed-files map, state diagram, tests, E2E evidence, risk notes, and OData links.
6. Finish normally. The paw-codex-worker will report WorkerRun.ReportDone or WorkerRun.ReportFailed to Temper after the local Codex process exits.

Codex change evidence:
```git-status
?? .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md
```

```git-diff-stat
(no unstaged diff stat)
```

After this PR is reported to Temper, Patrol should run independent ReviewRun and EvaluationRun gates before human merge review.
Created automatically by paw-codex-worker.

WorkerRun: `en-019e0591-d7d7-72a0-85c0-bf23879053ce`
Worker: `mac-mini-codex-prod`
Base branch: `codex/paw-patrol-worker-reporting`
Head branch: `codex/paw-patrol-197d2620`
Worktree: `/Users/openclaw/Development/temperpaw-worktrees/codex-paw-patrol-197d2620`

Task:
You are the local Codex implementer for reviewer-requested rework.

FactoryCase: en-019e0589-025d-7c60-8e9e-ee76785ccb66
WorkCycle: wc-019e0589-0acc-71f2-98c3-398685b5acf7
Summary: codex-live-proof: Live Paw Patrol review-rework proof after worker PR reuse fix. Only add or update this Markdown file: .proofs/mac-mini-r...

Original task:
You are the local Codex implementer for TemperPaw paw-patrol.

WorkRequest or legacy PatrolRequest: en-019e0588-e4d3-72f1-900a-d138197d2620
FactoryCase: en-019e0589-025d-7c60-8e9e-ee76785ccb66
WorkCycle: wc-019e0589-0acc-71f2-98c3-398685b5acf7
Summary: codex-live-proof: Live Paw Patrol review-rework proof after worker PR reuse fix. Only add or update this Markdown file: .proofs/mac-mini-r...

Request:
Live Paw Patrol review-rework proof after worker PR reuse fix. Only add or update this Markdown file: .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md.

Required sequence:
1. First pass: create the file with a Mermaid diagram and exact marker REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: needs_changes. Do not include REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: fulfilled on the first pass.
2. Reviewer should request changes while that marker is needs_changes.
3. Rework pass: update the same file on the same branch, replace the marker with REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: fulfilled, and add one sentence saying reviewer-requested rework was fulfilled.
4. Final proof mentions the WorkCycle, WorkerRun ids, ReviewRun ids, EvaluationRun, ProofPacket, and pull request if available.
5. Use lightweight Markdown verification.

Required loop:
1. Work in the assigned git worktree and branch.
2. Follow red-green TDD before implementation.
3. Keep orchestration Temper-native: entity specs, WASM integrations, and Cedar policies.
4. Run focused tests and relevant live/E2E verification for touched behavior.
5. Produce a visual ProofPacket with changed-files map, state diagram, tests, E2E evidence, risk notes, and OData links.
6. Finish normally. The paw-codex-worker will report WorkerRun.ReportDone or WorkerRun.ReportFailed to Temper after the local Codex process exits.

Reviewer feedback requiring changes:
Verdict: request_changes
Review: Read-only review of committed diff; changed scope is exactly `.proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md`, with no source, Cedar, WASM, Discord, dependency, or architecture changes.
Live/E2E: Ran `git diff --check HEAD^ HEAD`, marker checks with `rg`, Markdown fence balance with `awk`, `gh pr view`, and read-only OData curls; OData endpoints returned 401 without credentials.

Required loop:
1. Continue in the assigned git worktree and branch, updating the existing PR when one exists.
2. Address the reviewer feedback directly; keep unrelated changes out.
3. Follow red-green TDD for the correction when a test can express it.
4. Run the focused tests and live/E2E checks named by the reviewer when applicable.
5. Produce updated proof in the WorkerRun result. The paw-codex-worker will report WorkerRun.ReportDone or WorkerRun.ReportFailed to Temper after the local Codex process exits.

Codex change evidence:
```git-status
 M .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md
```

```git-diff-stat
 .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md | 109 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
```

After this PR is reported to Temper, Patrol should run independent ReviewRun and EvaluationRun gates before human merge review.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant