Skip to content

Paw Patrol WorkerRun en-019e057a-7e44-77e3-a43d-47b572fab1ad - #237

Closed
rita-aga wants to merge 2 commits into
codex/paw-patrol-worker-reportingfrom
codex/paw-patrol-052f3004
Closed

Paw Patrol WorkerRun en-019e057a-7e44-77e3-a43d-47b572fab1ad#237
rita-aga wants to merge 2 commits into
codex/paw-patrol-worker-reportingfrom
codex/paw-patrol-052f3004

Conversation

@rita-aga

@rita-aga rita-aga commented May 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Created automatically by paw-codex-worker.

WorkerRun: en-019e057a-7e44-77e3-a43d-47b572fab1ad
Worker: mac-mini-codex-prod
Base branch: codex/paw-patrol-worker-reporting
Head branch: codex/paw-patrol-052f3004
Worktree: /Users/openclaw/Development/temperpaw-worktrees/codex-paw-patrol-052f3004

Task:
You are the local Codex implementer for TemperPaw paw-patrol.

WorkRequest or legacy PatrolRequest: en-019e057a-7385-74a2-9a4a-2940052f3004
FactoryCase: en-019e057a-7cd5-75d3-84a1-f84a85014902
WorkCycle: wc-019e057a-7d87-7df1-b055-473ff30df4d3
Summary: codex-live-review-rework-proof: Live Paw Patrol review-rework proof. Only add or update this Markdown file: .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T0246...

Request:
Live Paw Patrol review-rework proof. Only add or update this Markdown file: .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md.

Required sequence:

  1. First pass: create the file with a Mermaid diagram and exact marker REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: needs_changes. Do not include REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: fulfilled on the first pass.
  2. Reviewer should request changes while that marker is needs_changes.
  3. Rework pass: update the same file on the same branch, replace the marker with REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: fulfilled, and add one sentence saying reviewer-requested rework was fulfilled.
  4. Final proof mentions the WorkCycle, WorkerRun ids, ReviewRun ids, EvaluationRun, ProofPacket, and pull request if available.
  5. Use lightweight Markdown verification.

Required loop:

  1. Work in the assigned git worktree and branch.
  2. Follow red-green TDD before implementation.
  3. Keep orchestration Temper-native: entity specs, WASM integrations, and Cedar policies.
  4. Run focused tests and relevant live/E2E verification for touched behavior.
  5. Produce a visual ProofPacket with changed-files map, state diagram, tests, E2E evidence, risk notes, and OData links.
  6. Finish normally. The paw-codex-worker will report WorkerRun.ReportDone or WorkerRun.ReportFailed to Temper after the local Codex process exits.

Codex change evidence:

?? .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md
(no unstaged diff stat)

After this PR is reported to Temper, Patrol should run independent ReviewRun and EvaluationRun gates before human merge review.

rita-aga added 2 commits May 7, 2026 22:50
Created automatically by paw-codex-worker.

WorkerRun: `en-019e057a-7e44-77e3-a43d-47b572fab1ad`
Worker: `mac-mini-codex-prod`
Base branch: `codex/paw-patrol-worker-reporting`
Head branch: `codex/paw-patrol-052f3004`
Worktree: `/Users/openclaw/Development/temperpaw-worktrees/codex-paw-patrol-052f3004`

Task:
You are the local Codex implementer for TemperPaw paw-patrol.

WorkRequest or legacy PatrolRequest: en-019e057a-7385-74a2-9a4a-2940052f3004
FactoryCase: en-019e057a-7cd5-75d3-84a1-f84a85014902
WorkCycle: wc-019e057a-7d87-7df1-b055-473ff30df4d3
Summary: codex-live-review-rework-proof: Live Paw Patrol review-rework proof. Only add or update this Markdown file: .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T0246...

Request:
Live Paw Patrol review-rework proof. Only add or update this Markdown file: .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md.

Required sequence:
1. First pass: create the file with a Mermaid diagram and exact marker REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: needs_changes. Do not include REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: fulfilled on the first pass.
2. Reviewer should request changes while that marker is needs_changes.
3. Rework pass: update the same file on the same branch, replace the marker with REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: fulfilled, and add one sentence saying reviewer-requested rework was fulfilled.
4. Final proof mentions the WorkCycle, WorkerRun ids, ReviewRun ids, EvaluationRun, ProofPacket, and pull request if available.
5. Use lightweight Markdown verification.

Required loop:
1. Work in the assigned git worktree and branch.
2. Follow red-green TDD before implementation.
3. Keep orchestration Temper-native: entity specs, WASM integrations, and Cedar policies.
4. Run focused tests and relevant live/E2E verification for touched behavior.
5. Produce a visual ProofPacket with changed-files map, state diagram, tests, E2E evidence, risk notes, and OData links.
6. Finish normally. The paw-codex-worker will report WorkerRun.ReportDone or WorkerRun.ReportFailed to Temper after the local Codex process exits.

Codex change evidence:
```git-status
?? .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md
```

```git-diff-stat
(no unstaged diff stat)
```

After this PR is reported to Temper, Patrol should run independent ReviewRun and EvaluationRun gates before human merge review.
Created automatically by paw-codex-worker.

WorkerRun: `en-019e0580-b8c1-76b2-b7b5-98e656b68e7a`
Worker: `mac-mini-codex-prod`
Base branch: `codex/paw-patrol-worker-reporting`
Head branch: `codex/paw-patrol-052f3004`
Worktree: `/Users/openclaw/Development/temperpaw-worktrees/codex-paw-patrol-052f3004`

Task:
You are the local Codex implementer for reviewer-requested rework.

FactoryCase: en-019e057a-7cd5-75d3-84a1-f84a85014902
WorkCycle: wc-019e057a-7d87-7df1-b055-473ff30df4d3
Summary: codex-live-review-rework-proof: Live Paw Patrol review-rework proof. Only add or update this Markdown file: .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T0246...

Original task:
You are the local Codex implementer for TemperPaw paw-patrol.

WorkRequest or legacy PatrolRequest: en-019e057a-7385-74a2-9a4a-2940052f3004
FactoryCase: en-019e057a-7cd5-75d3-84a1-f84a85014902
WorkCycle: wc-019e057a-7d87-7df1-b055-473ff30df4d3
Summary: codex-live-review-rework-proof: Live Paw Patrol review-rework proof. Only add or update this Markdown file: .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T0246...

Request:
Live Paw Patrol review-rework proof. Only add or update this Markdown file: .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md.

Required sequence:
1. First pass: create the file with a Mermaid diagram and exact marker REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: needs_changes. Do not include REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: fulfilled on the first pass.
2. Reviewer should request changes while that marker is needs_changes.
3. Rework pass: update the same file on the same branch, replace the marker with REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: fulfilled, and add one sentence saying reviewer-requested rework was fulfilled.
4. Final proof mentions the WorkCycle, WorkerRun ids, ReviewRun ids, EvaluationRun, ProofPacket, and pull request if available.
5. Use lightweight Markdown verification.

Required loop:
1. Work in the assigned git worktree and branch.
2. Follow red-green TDD before implementation.
3. Keep orchestration Temper-native: entity specs, WASM integrations, and Cedar policies.
4. Run focused tests and relevant live/E2E verification for touched behavior.
5. Produce a visual ProofPacket with changed-files map, state diagram, tests, E2E evidence, risk notes, and OData links.
6. Finish normally. The paw-codex-worker will report WorkerRun.ReportDone or WorkerRun.ReportFailed to Temper after the local Codex process exits.

Reviewer feedback requiring changes:
Verdict: request_changes
Review: WorkerRun `en-019e057a-7e44-77e3-a43d-47b572fab1ad` adds only the proof Markdown file in the relevant commit; the first-pass proof is valid, but the required loop now needs rework.
Live/E2E: I performed lightweight Markdown and marker verification only; no full live system E2E was run because this review is intentionally the request-changes gate before the rework pass.

Required loop:
1. Continue in the assigned git worktree and branch, updating the existing PR when one exists.
2. Address the reviewer feedback directly; keep unrelated changes out.
3. Follow red-green TDD for the correction when a test can express it.
4. Run the focused tests and live/E2E checks named by the reviewer when applicable.
5. Produce updated proof in the WorkerRun result. The paw-codex-worker will report WorkerRun.ReportDone or WorkerRun.ReportFailed to Temper after the local Codex process exits.

Codex change evidence:
```git-status
 M .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md
```

```git-diff-stat
 .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md | 67 +++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
```

After this PR is reported to Temper, Patrol should run independent ReviewRun and EvaluationRun gates before human merge review.
@rita-aga

rita-aga commented May 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Superseded by the completed live review-rework proof in #238 and the implementation PR #229. Closing to keep the PR list clean.

@rita-aga rita-aga closed this May 8, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant