Demo ShellCheck violation introduction#39
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces a new shell function designed to intentionally violate ShellCheck rules. The primary purpose of this change is to provide a concrete example for testing and educational use cases related to static analysis of shell scripts. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a new shell function demo_shellcheck_break in Backend/test/smoke_test.sh and calls it. The review feedback highlights that the current implementation of demo_shellcheck_break does not introduce the intended ShellCheck violation (SC2086) because the variable is correctly quoted, suggesting a modification to achieve this. Additionally, it's recommended to redirect the output of demo_shellcheck_break to /dev/null to avoid cluttering test results, as its output is not currently used for assertions.
| test_shutdown No newline at end of file | ||
| demo_shellcheck_break() { | ||
| local name="Sprint 7" | ||
| echo "$name" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The pull request description states that this change is intended to introduce a ShellCheck violation. However, this line is correct as the variable is double-quoted. To introduce the intended violation (SC2086), you should remove the quotes around $name.
| echo "$name" | |
| echo $name |
| } | ||
|
|
||
| test_shutdown | ||
| demo_shellcheck_break |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The output of demo_shellcheck_break is sent to standard output, which may clutter the test results. Since the output is not being used for any assertions, consider redirecting it to /dev/null to keep the test output clean.
| demo_shellcheck_break | |
| demo_shellcheck_break >/dev/null |
1 participant
Introduce a function that intentionally violates ShellCheck rules for demonstration purposes. This change serves as an example for testing and educational use.