Skip to content

fix: grant RBAC for events.k8s.io Events emitted by the events/v1 recorder#391

Open
xrl wants to merge 1 commit into
etcd-io:mainfrom
xrl:pr/fix-events-rbac
Open

fix: grant RBAC for events.k8s.io Events emitted by the events/v1 recorder#391
xrl wants to merge 1 commit into
etcd-io:mainfrom
xrl:pr/fix-events-rbac

Conversation

@xrl

@xrl xrl commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

On a real cluster every operator-emitted Event is rejected by the API server: Server rejected event (will not retry!) ... User "system:serviceaccount:etcd-operator-system:etcd-operator-controller-manager" cannot create resource "events" in API group "events.k8s.io", so kubectl describe etcdcluster always shows Events: <none>. The recorder wired in SetupWithManager via mgr.GetEventRecorder writes events.k8s.io/v1 Events, but role.yaml only grants events verbs in the core ("") API group — envtest does not enforce RBAC, so tests never catch this. This adds an events.k8s.io events create;patch RBAC marker (the two verbs the client-go tools/events broadcaster uses) and regenerates config/rbac/role.yaml. Verified with go build ./... and go test ./internal/... ./api/....


PR series — operability fixes & TLS

Small single-purpose PRs from live kind-cluster testing of the operator. Each stands alone unless an After is listed. → = this PR.

PR Lands After
Reviewable now — small, any order
🟢 #374 Requeue instead of swallowing the client-cert provisioning error
🟢→ #391 Grant events.k8s.io RBAC so operator Events are actually recorded
🟢 #392 Correlate members[]/leaderID from one health snapshot (consistent leader)
🟢 #393 Propagate user-supplied altNames.ipAddresses into certificates
🟢 #394 Accept day-suffix validityDuration (365d, 100d12h) as documented
🟢 #395 Surface early reconcile errors as a Degraded condition (was empty status)
🟢 #379 Configurable reconcile worker pool (--max-concurrent-reconciles)
🟢 #369 kind-based stress/scale e2e harness (1/3/7 members, churn, quorum watcher)
TLS stack — in order
🟢 #376 Independent spec.tls.{peer,client} surfaces (breaking alpha API)
#377 TLSReady condition + TLS lifecycle Events #376
#378 Multi-member TLS quorum e2e + PeerCANotShared #377
Parked as drafts pending #363
#382 Per-cluster domain metrics on the operator /metrics endpoint
#384 EtcdCluster admission webhooks (consolidating with #328) #363
#386 EtcdBackup CR → object storage (S3/GCS) #363
#387 Automatic quorum-loss disaster recovery (bootstrap-latch guarded) #363

🟢 ready · ⚪ draft

…order

The recorder returned by mgr.GetEventRecorder writes events.k8s.io/v1
Events, but role.yaml only granted events verbs in the core ("") API
group, so the API server rejects every operator-emitted Event on real
clusters (envtest does not enforce RBAC):

  Server rejected event (will not retry!) ... cannot create resource
  "events" in API group "events.k8s.io"

Add an events.k8s.io events create;patch RBAC marker (the two verbs the
client-go tools/events broadcaster uses) and regenerate role.yaml.

Signed-off-by: Xavier Lange <xrlange@gmail.com>
@kubernetes-prow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: xrl
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign jberkus for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@kubernetes-prow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi @xrl. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a etcd-io member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work.

Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant