Add logging to try to diagnose SIGSEGV issues - #51
Conversation
8309329 to
84f04b1
Compare
84f04b1 to
e2e8917
Compare
cuttestkittensrule
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
lgtm; We may want to include stderr on non-debug runs, but other than that, I don't have any comments. This also isn't the worst thing since all runs are debug by default here, so stderr will usually be included
79b47b1 to
81a6153
Compare
81a6153 to
6d1b9a8
Compare
|
fyi, the artifacts for the two SISEGV only have the |
My guess is the SIGSEGV killed the process that was processing the test results. |
|
Looking at one of the crash logs, I see multiple references to I'm guessing this is some kind of race condition between these threads and our calls to |
d7582a0 to
7c08f73
Compare
7c08f73 to
6269fac
Compare
|
It's a race condition related to queued up network table events and the call to |
@RunWith(Enclosed.class)NetworkTableInstanceinIsolatedPreferences