This demo shows the intended WebCodex workflow. It is a product walkthrough, not a script you must copy exactly.
Use WebCodex on project agent:local-dev:<project_id>.
Inspect this repo, find a small failing or stale documentation issue, fix it,
run appropriate validation, show changes, run workspace hygiene, and finish.
Prefer structured edit tools. Do not touch secrets. Do not use run_shell unless
the structured validation tools are not enough.
For the first run, make the task read-only:
Use WebCodex on project agent:local-dev:<project_id>.
Inspect README.md and docs/QUICK_START.md, summarize how setup works, show
changes without a diff, run workspace hygiene, and finish. Do not edit files.
start_coding_tasklist_project_files,search_project_text, orread_fileapply_text_edits(precise local),apply_patch_checked(multi-file), orwrite_project_file(create/full rewrite)validate_patch,cargo_fmt,cargo_check, orcargo_testshow_changesgit_diff_hunkswhen targeted diff inspection is neededworkspace_hygiene_checkfinish_coding_tasksession_handoff_summarywhen another operator or client needs to continue
run_shell is available as a bounded escape hatch. It should not be the first choice for editing or validation.
- Changed files and whether they match the requested scope.
- Validation result and whether it is appropriate for the change type.
show_changesoutput, including warnings and truncation flags.workspace_hygiene_checkfindings.- Final
finish_coding_tasktask/evidence outcomes. - Any handoff notes, open risks, or rollback instructions.
- Do not expose secrets in prompts, tool output, docs, or examples.
- Keep the project id explicit:
agent:<client_id>:<project_id>. - Prefer structured edits over shell-based writes.
- Prefer structured validation over broad shell commands.
- The final workspace should be clean, or intentionally dirty for human inspection.
- If the task was only a smoke test, revert the small edit with normal Git review practices.
- First setup: QUICK_START.md
- Concepts: CONCEPTS.md
- Security: ../SECURITY.md