docs(design): forward-looking improvement proposals#54
Closed
fazpu wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
Companion to success-semantics-and-evaluation.md. Where that doc records decisions already made and not to be reverted, this one collects the forward-looking changes we are considering, curated from the July 2026 review under design/analysis/ and re-prioritized. Framing decision that drives priority: ugm will be driven by the planner/dispatcher double loop from the very beginning (not after a single-loop pilot), which moves the parent/child machinery from "harden later" to "harden first". Priorities: - P0 (double-loop foundations): durable session-stack/active-child recovery (the untested crash gap), human-in-the-loop pause state, per-child budgets, and making the PM template runnable from a clean init. - P1 (legibility/safety): events.jsonl + cost ledger, a deterministic backstop UNDER the judge for high-stakes targets (without reverting the eval decision), and fixing the stale Agent Skill. - P2 (hardening/DX): model profiles + trio version pins, the _advance() refactor folded into the state-machine work, richer failure taxonomy, and operator UX (doctor/validate/session-aware status+stop). - Explicitly deferred: parallel loopy workers, web dashboard, breadth-first child sessions. All items are Proposed, not Accepted. No code changes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PN8aFwwxA8FzMy9LgpbQFt
Member
Author
|
Superseded by a clean, generic version based on main (see the new improvement-proposals PR). Closing this stacked branch. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
Adds
design/designs/improvement-proposals.md— the forward-looking companion to the success-semantics design doc (#53). Where #53 records decisions already made (and not to be reverted), this doc collects the changes we are considering, curated from the July 2026 review underdesign/analysis/and re-prioritized. Every item is marked Proposed, not Accepted. No code changes.Framing decision that drives priority
ugmwill be driven by the planner/dispatcher double loop from the very beginning — not after a single-loop pilot. That moves the parent/child machinery from "harden later" to harden first, because it's exercised on day one of the flagship use case. The ordering reflects that.Priorities
P0 — double-loop foundations
paused/waiting_for_humanstate + typed gate/external-action requests (a governance pause is not an error).max_turns: 120).inner_outer_evalchild set today).P1 — legibility & safety
events.jsonl+ usage/cost ledger, thenloopy status --watch.ugm) — shells out to the repo's own contract tests; explicitly does not revert the eval decision in docs(design): record success-semantics and evaluation decisions #53.P2 — hardening & DX
team-harness<0.3, eval-banana as an extra)._advance()refactor, folded into the P0.1 state-machine work.doctor/validate/ session-awarestatus+stop --force.Explicitly deferred: parallel loopy workers, web dashboard, breadth-first child sessions.
Suggested sequencing
P0.1+P0.2+P2.2 (one coherent state-machine piece) → P0.3+P0.4 (double loop safe + runnable) → P1.1 (legible) → P1.2+P1.3 → P2.x rolling. After that, the double loop is ready to drive
ugm— the subject of a separate execution design, not this doc.🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_01PN8aFwwxA8FzMy9LgpbQFt