Skip to content

wjlgatech/longevity-loop

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

Β 

History

9 Commits
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 

Repository files navigation

πŸ§¬β™»οΈ longevity-loop β€” an AI-native compounding loop for aging science

CI Last Updated License

πŸ› οΈ Method & tooling: FM-os β€” the SLM/foundation-model-ops hub and the closed-loop machinery this project runs on. longevity-loop is FM-os applied to a real mission.

A solo builder's public, self-improving loop for AI Γ— longevity: pick a falsifiable question β†’ analyze open aging data β†’ score on a public verifier β†’ write it up honestly β†’ share β†’ let the artifact recruit people, feedback, and funding β†’ repeat, harder. Built in public, verified not vibed.

North star: climb a credibility-gated, code-only leaderboard (the Biomarkers of Aging Challenge on the open Biolearn platform) β€” real signal in aging science with no wet lab.


Not medical advice. Computational results on public data are labeled as such and kept strictly separate from any wet-lab/therapeutic claim (which requires independent validation). No evidence β‡’ no claim.


♻️ The Loop (one turn of the flywheel)

Each turn is falsifiable and ends in a shared, verifiable artifact. No evidence β‡’ no claim.

# Stage What happens
1 QUESTION State one falsifiable question + the metric that settles it (and the null you'd accept).
2 DATA Pull an OPEN aging dataset (CELLxGENE, Tabula Muris Senis, GEO, GTEx, the Biomarkers challenge set).
3 MODEL Analyze / fine-tune an open bio-FM (pyaging, Geneformer, scGPT) β€” cheaply, reproducibly.
4 VERIFY Score on a public verifier β€” the Biolearn leaderboard or a held-out benchmark. No evidence β‡’ no claim.
5 WRITE-UP Honest report: result AND the null/failure, threats-to-validity, a reproduce command.
6 SHARE Build in public β€” repo + thread + explainer; route to the human hubs (VitaDAO, LBF, Foresight).
7 COMPOUND The artifact recruits feedback, collaborators, and funding β†’ they unlock the next, harder question.

⑦ COMPOUND feeds back into β‘  β€” each turn adds data, a tool, or a connection, so the next question is bigger.


πŸ““ Turns Log

Every turn of the loop, logged honestly. done requires a PROOF (result incl. the null + a reproduce command).

Turn Question Stage Status
turn-01-biolearn-baseline Motivated by Levine's Systems Age (2025): does cross-clock DISAGREEMENT (heterogeneity across a clock panel) add predictive signal over the best single clock on the Biomarkers-of-Aging open data? VERIFY 🧩 scaffolded
turn-02-biofm-finetune Does fine-tuning an open single-cell FM beat a frozen-embedding linear probe at predicting age? MODEL 🧩 scaffolded

πŸ›°οΈ Frontier Radar

The frontier groundbreakers' most recent deep works β€” verified, with a link + a real quote. Refreshed weekly by scripts/track.py (arXiv + GitHub).

  • Alex Zhavoronkov β€” The End of Aging Clocks: Training Foundation Models to Reason in Aging and Longevity (2026) Longevity-LLM v0.1 (fine-tuned Qwen3-14B) hit 4.34-yr MAE epigenetic-age prediction (beating Horvath) across methylation/proteomics/clinical/RNA, and handled multiple longevity tasks.

    "These results demonstrate that a single modestly sized LLM can match or replace purpose-built aging clocks across data modalities." β†’ Future: Interim report from Insilico's Multi-Modal AI Gym for Science (MMAI) β€” foundation models for drug discovery + aging.

  • Morgan Levine β€” Systems Age: one blood methylation test quantifying aging across 11 physiological systems (2025) DNA-methylation clocks that score aging separately per system (heart, lung, brain, immune…) from one blood draw, beating global clocks at system-relevant disease prediction.

    "most epigenetic clocks provide a single age estimate, overlooking within-person variation." β†’ Future: System-specific clocks usable clinically to track how interventions shift aging in individual organ systems.

  • Tony Wyss-Coray β€” Plasma proteomic signatures of cellular aging predict human disease (2026) From >7,000 plasma proteins in 60,542 people, ML models estimate biological age of 40+ cell types, linking cell-type-specific aging to disease and mortality.

    "Aging is asynchronous across cells and organs." β†’ Future: Cell-type-resolved plasma proteomic clocks as clinical biomarkers from a single blood test.

  • Vadim Gladyshev β€” Mammalian aging involves genome-wide splicing degeneration leading to functional decline (2026) Integrative mouse/human analysis shows aging systematically loses RNA-splicing fidelity ('splicing degeneration'), rising with age but alleviated by calorie restriction or rapamycin β€” a proposed new hallmark.

    "aging is characterized by systematic deterioration of the fidelity of RNA splicing, here termed splicing degeneration" β†’ Future: Splicing degeneration as 'a promising target for aging interventions acting to reverse' it.

  • JoΓ£o Pedro de MagalhΓ£es β€” Translational toolkit for reproducible, cross-study profiling of human ageing hallmarks (2026) A validated assay toolkit to simultaneously quantify 8+ ageing hallmarks (senescence, immune ageing, mTOR, autophagy, genomic instability…) in clinically accessible human blood and tissue.

    "a validated, high-resolution toolkit for the simultaneous quantification of multiple ageing hallmarks in clinically accessible human samples" β†’ Future: Standardize hallmark measurement to overcome methodological heterogeneity and translate into human clinical studies.

  • Peter Fedichev β€” A Minimal Model Explains Aging Regimes and Guides Intervention Strategies (2025) Reduces aging physiology to three variables (resilience, entropic damage, regulatory noise), yielding two regimes: linear damage-driven aging in stable species like humans vs intrinsic instability in mice/flies.

    "In stable species, including humans, aging is driven by linear damage accumulation that gradually erodes resilience" β†’ Future: A three-level intervention roadmap: target dynamic hallmarks, reduce physiological noise, slow/reverse entropic damage.

  • Jacob Kimmel β€” In silico design of epigenetic reprogramming payloads (2025) NewLimit's generative model (protein-foundation-model transfer learning) designs transcription-factor reprogramming payloads from sparse sampling of the combinatorial TF space, in a lab-in-the-loop.

    "Through diverse epigenetic codes, human cells execute distinct programs from a common genome" β†’ Future: Run the model lab-in-the-loop to design reprogramming interventions far faster than pure experiments.

  • George Church β€” Replacement as an aging intervention (Nature Aging Perspective) (2025) Argues replacing aged cells/tissues/organs is an underappreciated, near-term-feasible strategy where drug interventions have not yet proven durable in humans.

    "there is a lack of interventions conclusively shown to attenuate the processes of aging in humans" β†’ Future: Develop replacement-based interventions (cell/tissue/organ) alongside reprogramming and gene therapy.

  • Steve Horvath β€” Epigenetic ageing clocks: statistical methods and emerging computational challenges (2025) Nature Reviews Genetics review (Teschendorff & Horvath) on the statistical foundations of epigenetic clocks and open problems in interpretation, cell-type heterogeneity, and single-cell methods.

    "many computational and statistical challenges remain that limit our understanding, interpretation and application of epigenetic clocks" β†’ Future: Interpretable clocks built at cell-type and single-cell resolution to make epigenetic age causally + clinically meaningful.

  • Matt Kaeberlein β€” Exercise and Weekly Sirolimus (Rapamycin) in Older Adults: RAPA-EX-01 RCT (2026) RCT (40 adults, 65-85) found once-weekly 6 mg rapamycin did NOT boost β€” and may have slightly blunted β€” functional gains from a 13-week exercise program, with more adverse events. A clean, useful negative result.

    "did not enhance, and in sensitivity analyses, it may have modestly attenuated short-term functional improvements from a home exercise programme" β†’ Future: Test alternative rapamycin dosing/timing (e.g. mTORC1 cycling) before combining with exercise in older adults.

πŸ•ΈοΈ Congregational view: the field as a spatiotemporal knowledge graph (modeled after getzep/graphiti) β€” open the field graph β†’.

Reflections β€” what else could be important? (synthesis, not claims)

  • Clocks are collapsing into foundation models: Zhavoronkov's Longevity-LLM replacing purpose-built clocks + Kimmel's protein-FM reprogramming design β†’ the field's own 'FM-ops' moment. A unified multimodal aging FM is the obvious open target.
  • Aging is resolving from one number to many: Systems Age (11 systems), Wyss-Coray (40+ cell types), Gladyshev (splicing as a new hallmark). The gap: a shared, cell/system-resolved BENCHMARK so these aren't incomparable β€” a natural longevity-loop contribution.
  • Negative results are becoming first-class (Kaeberlein's rapamycin+exercise null). An open registry of honest longevity nulls would be high-trust signal and is exactly the no-evidenceβ‡’No discipline the field needs.
  • Correlation β‰  cause is the recurring caveat (Horvath): the frontier wants INTERPRETABLE, causal clocks. A loop turn probing whether an intervention moves a clock in a held-out, pre-registered way is more valuable than a new clock.
  • The data wall is inverting in biology (multiomic tokens > internet-text tokens): the scarce input is now well-curated, standardized human hallmark data (de MagalhΓ£es' toolkit) β€” curation, not compute, is the bottleneck to attack.
  • Two camps to bridge: 'repair/replace damage' (Church, Fedichev's entropic damage) vs 'reprogram/rejuvenate' (Kimmel, Levine). A model that predicts which regime a given tissue is in could route interventions β€” an unclaimed synthesis.

πŸ—ΊοΈ 90-Day Roadmap

Three tracks every week β€” full weekly plan in docs/ROADMAP.md:

  • 🧠 Knowledge β€” ramp on aging biology fast; verify every claim against a primary paper (TRUE = evidenced).
  • πŸ› οΈ Tooling β€” each week ships runnable, gated code (the loop); cheap fine-tunes on Tinker/Modal.
  • 🀝 Connections β€” build in public; reach the hubs + people with an artifact in hand, never empty-handed.

Phase 1 β€” Foundation & First Signal Β· Days 1–30

Stand up the loop, ramp on aging biology, ship the first VERIFIABLE result.

GATE 1 β€” public repo live Β· β‰₯1 leaderboard submission Β· first grant application in Β· 5 researcher touches.

Phase 2 β€” Differentiated Result & Momentum Β· Days 31–60

A genuine finding on OPEN data + an adopted open tool + a real collaborator.

GATE 2 β€” a reproducible finding write-up Β· an open tool with β‰₯1 external user Β· 1 named collaborator Β· a micro-grant funded OR strong grant progress.

Phase 3 β€” Credibility & Leverage Β· Days 61–90

Convert signal into a preprint, non-dilutive funding, and a deliberate fork in the road.

GATE 3 β€” a preprint OR top-decile leaderboard Β· non-dilutive funding Β· a named collaborator Β· a clear next-90 plan.

Signal ladder (each rung recruits the next):

  1. Public repo + honest launch thread
  2. First open-leaderboard submission (code-only, credibility-gated)
  3. A reproduced aging clock + a shipped open tool
  4. A fine-tuned bio-FM finding on open data (research-loop write-up)
  5. A named academic/industry collaborator
  6. Non-dilutive micro-grant (VitaDAO / Foresight)
  7. A preprint or top-decile leaderboard finish
  8. A talk/podcast + a company-or-lab decision

🧠 Researchers

πŸ€– = AI-forward Β· πŸ’¬ = active in the open community (good first contacts).

  • JoΓ£o Pedro de MagalhΓ£es πŸ€–πŸ’¬ β€” University of Birmingham: HAGR aging databases; computational biogerontology
  • Alex Zhavoronkov πŸ€–πŸ’¬ β€” Insilico Medicine: deep-learning aging clocks + generative AI drug discovery
  • Peter Fedichev πŸ€–πŸ’¬ β€” Gero: physics/AI dynamical models of aging
  • Jacob Kimmel πŸ€–πŸ’¬ β€” NewLimit (fmr Calico): ML-designed reprogramming payloads; bio foundation models
  • Morgan Levine πŸ€–πŸ’¬ β€” Altos Labs (fmr Yale): epigenetic aging clocks (PhenoAge)
  • Tony Wyss-Coray πŸ€–πŸ’¬ β€” Stanford: plasma-proteomic organ aging clocks
  • Vadim Gladyshev πŸ€– β€” Harvard Medical School: mouse + single-cell (scAge) aging clocks
  • George Church πŸ€–πŸ’¬ β€” Harvard / Wyss Institute: gene-therapy longevity; synthetic biology
  • Nir Barzilai πŸ’¬ β€” Albert Einstein College of Medicine: centenarian genetics; TAME metformin trial
  • Matt Kaeberlein πŸ’¬ β€” Optispan (fmr U. Washington): rapamycin geroscience; Dog Aging Project
  • David Sinclair πŸ’¬ β€” Harvard Medical School: information theory of aging; reprogramming; sirtuins
  • Eric Verdin πŸ’¬ β€” Buck Institute: geroscience; ketone bodies; immune aging
  • Andrew Steele πŸ’¬ β€” Independent (author of 'Ageless'): longevity science communication
  • Charles Brenner πŸ’¬ β€” City of Hope: NAD+ metabolism; vocal longevity-hype skeptic (a good reality check)
  • Joe Betts-LaCroix πŸ’¬ β€” Retro Biosciences: reprogramming + autophagy longevity company
  • Kristen Fortney πŸ€– β€” BioAge Labs: ML on longitudinal human data for aging drug discovery

🏒 Startups & Labs

πŸ€– = AI-native platform.

  • NewLimit πŸ€– β€” AI-guided epigenetic reprogramming to restore youthful cell function (well-funded-private)
  • Retro Biosciences πŸ€– β€” reverse cellular aging (reprogramming, autophagy) + AI protein design (well-funded-private)
  • Gero πŸ€– β€” physics-based AI modeling of aging + generative molecule design (well-funded-private)
  • Shift Bioscience πŸ€– β€” AI 'virtual cell' for safe single-gene cellular reprogramming (early)
  • BioAge Labs πŸ€– β€” aging-biology multi-omics ML platform (metabolic disease) (public)
  • Insilico Medicine πŸ€– β€” generative AI drug discovery (PandaOmics, Chemistry42) + clinical pipeline (public)
  • Altos Labs β€” cellular rejuvenation via partial reprogramming (+ growing computation arm) (well-funded-private)
  • Calico Life Sciences β€” basic biology of aging β†’ age-related-disease medicines (well-funded-private)
  • Recursion πŸ€– β€” AI drug discovery via cellular imaging (Recursion OS; merged Exscientia) (public)
  • Isomorphic Labs πŸ€– β€” AI drug design built on AlphaFold (well-funded-private)
  • Cellarity πŸ€– β€” AI on single-cell transcriptomics to design cell-state-correcting medicines (well-funded-private)
  • Xaira Therapeutics πŸ€– β€” AI-native drug discovery on David Baker's generative protein models (well-funded-private)
  • Rubedo Life Sciences πŸ€– β€” AI-driven senolytics discovery (ALEMBIC platform) (well-funded-private)
  • Gordian Biotechnology β€” high-throughput in-vivo pooled screening (Mosaic) for diseases of aging (early)
  • Loyal β€” canine longevity β€” lifespan-extension drugs for dogs (well-funded-private)
  • Centenara Labs β€” hallmarks-of-aging therapeutics portfolio (fmr Rejuveron) (well-funded-private)

πŸ› οΈ The Buildable Stack (open, code-only)

Models

  • Geneformer β€” Transformer on ~30-104M single-cell transcriptomes; fine-tune for cell-type / perturbation / aging tasks.
  • scGPT β€” GPT-style single-cell foundation model; fine-tune for annotation, integration, perturbation prediction.
  • ESM-2 β€” Protein LM (8M-650M) that runs on a laptop; embeddings for variant-effect on longevity genes.
  • TxGNN β€” GNN over a drug/disease knowledge graph for zero-shot repurposing; rank candidate longevity interventions.
  • AltumAge β€” Deep pan-tissue methylation clock (MLP over ~20k CpGs) to fine-tune/benchmark vs ElasticNet clocks.

Tools

  • AlphaFold β€” Structure prediction; usually query the precomputed AlphaFold DB rather than run locally.
  • scanpy β€” Standard single-cell preprocessing (QC/clustering/DE) before any aging model.
  • CZ CELLxGENE Census β€” API to slice ~33M+ standardized cells by tissue/age/disease in seconds β€” fastest cohort pull.
  • pyaging β€” PyTorch package bundling 50+ aging clocks with one API β€” score biological age on a laptop.
  • Biolearn β€” Open standardized platform for the Biomarkers of Aging Challenge β€” the code-only leaderboard to compete on.

Clocks

  • scAge β€” Epigenetic age from sparse single-cell methylation β€” detect cell-level aging + rejuvenation.
  • DunedinPACE β€” Pace-of-aging (rate, not age) from 450k/EPIC β€” a strong intervention outcome variable.

Datasets

  • Tabula Muris Senis β€” Mouse aging cell atlas (~500k cells, 18 organs) β€” the go-to open single-cell aging benchmark.
  • GTEx Portal β€” Human multi-tissue expression with donor age; expression matrices download freely (genotypes gated).
  • NCBI GEO β€” Largest public expression/epigenomics archive; search 'age'-flagged series to build custom aging sets.
  • Human Cell Atlas β€” Open multi-omic reference maps (70M+ cells) for age-stratified tissue baselines.
  • HAGR (GenAge / CellAge) β€” Curated aging/senescence gene sets (GenAge 307, CellAge 866) β€” priors / feature filters.
  • UK Biobank β€” 500k multi-omic + health cohort β€” ACCESS-GATED (application/fee/cloud-only), not laptop-downloadable.

Benchmarks

  • Biomarkers of Aging Challenge β€” Open competition + curated dataset (methylation/proteomics/outcomes, 500+ people) β€” the North-Star code-only leaderboard.
  • Open Problems in Single-Cell β€” Community benchmarking harness (tasks/datasets/metrics) to fairly evaluate a model vs baselines.
  • LAB-Bench β€” 2,457-question benchmark for LLMs on biology research tasks (literature, sequences, DBs).
  • BixBench β€” Benchmark for LLM agents on real computational-biology analysis workflows.

🀝 Funding & Community

βœ… = realistically open to a solo/independent builder.

  • Biomarkers of Aging Challenge / Longevity Prize βœ… grant β€” Open, code-only competition + curated dataset (Biolearn) β€” the IDEAL first credibility-gated signal, no wet lab.
  • VitaDAO / VitaLabs βœ… community β€” DeSci collective; fast fellowship grants (~$65K), light application, active Discord β€” most accessible funding+community on-ramp.
  • Foresight Institute β€” Longevity Grants βœ… grant β€” Monthly-deadline frontier grants (AI-for-science + longevity), unusually open to non-traditional applicants.
  • Foresight Fellowship βœ… fellowship β€” Year-long fellowship; mentorship + intros to funders/senior scientists; global, independent-friendly.
  • Longevity Biotech Fellowship (LBF) βœ… fellowship β€” The main 'how do I get into longevity biotech' front door (ODLB merged in); cohort + retreat + community.
  • age1 βœ… accelerator β€” Laura Deming's longevity accelerator (~$500K, 4-mo). Dilutive β€” the premier founder on-ramp; apply with a public track record.
  • Impetus Longevity Grants (Norn Group) πŸ”’ grant β€” Fast $10K-$500K aging-science grants (~3-4 wk decisions) β€” PI/lab-gated; partner into a lab to access.
  • Hevolution Foundation πŸ”’ grant β€” Large geroscience funder ($300-500K/yr); institutional/PI-gated β€” a funder to partner toward.
  • XPRIZE Healthspan πŸ”’ grant β€” $101M team competition (restore function 10-20 yrs). Team/clinical β€” highest-leverage as a rallying point + network.
  • NIA (NIH) πŸ”’ grant β€” Largest US non-dilutive aging funder; SBIR/STTR is the realistic founder path once incorporated.
  • Astera Institute (Rejuvenome) πŸ”’ grant β€” Runs the open ~$70M combinatorial mouse-lifespan dataset β€” build on it as open data; grants are relationship-driven.
  • Vitalist Bay / Vitalism βœ… community β€” Longevity pop-up city β€” the highest-density in-person gathering of the frontier/independent crowd.
  • Aging Research & Drug Discovery (ARDD) βœ… conference β€” The top translational-geroscience conference (Copenhagen) β€” where the serious science+investor crowd is.
  • Longevity Summit Dublin βœ… conference β€” Rejuvenation-biotech heavy (de Grey/O'Dea); researchers + advocates + investors.
  • Longevity Marketcap (Nathan Cheng) βœ… media β€” Most-read industry newsletter; Cheng is a hub node (LBF, Vitalism, Healthspan Capital) β€” engage to map who's who.
  • Lifespan.io βœ… media β€” Advocacy + news non-profit β€” a place to get build-in-public work amplified to an engaged audience.
  • Longevity.Technology βœ… media β€” Daily industry/investment newsletter β€” track funding rounds + deal-flow signals.

πŸ“£ Build in public

This repo IS the artifact: every turn commits data, a result, or a connection. Follow the commits, open an issue with a paper/dataset/collaborator, or PR an entry to data/*.yml.

Generated from data/*.yml by scripts/build.py β€” do not edit by hand. A sibling of FM-os.

About

πŸ§¬β™»οΈ An AI-native, build-in-public compounding loop for aging science: falsifiable question β†’ open data β†’ public verifier β†’ honest write-up β†’ share β†’ compound. No wet lab required.

Topics

Resources

License

Stars

1 star

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

 
 
 

Contributors