ixgbevf XDP and AF_XDP#4
Open
walking-machine wants to merge 15 commits into
Open
Conversation
Similarly as in commit 5384467 ("iavf: kill "legacy-rx" for good"), drop skb construction logic in favor of only using napi_build_skb() as a superior option that reduces the need to allocate and copy memory. As IXGBEVF_PRIV_FLAGS_LEGACY_RX is the only private flag in ixgbevf, entirely remove private flags support from the driver. When compared to iavf changes, ixgbevf has a single complication: MAC type 82599 cannot finely limit the DMA write size with RXDCTL.RLPML, only 1024 increments through SRRCTL are available, see commit fe68195 ("ixgbevf: Require large buffers for build_skb on 82599VF") and commit 2bafa8f ("ixgbe: don't set RXDCTL.RLPML for 82599"). Therefore, this is a special case requiring legacy RX unless large buffers are used. For now, solve this by always using large buffers for this MAC type. Suggested-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>
Again, same as in the related iavf commit 920d86f ("iavf: drop page splitting and recycling"), as an intermediate step, drop the page sharing and recycling logic in a preparation to offload it to page_pool. Instead of the previous sharing and recycling, just allocate a new page every time. Suggested-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>
walking-machine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 25, 2026
…unlock race When the FUTEX_ROBUST_UNLOCK mechanism is used for unlocking (PI-)futexes, then the unlock sequence in user space looks like this: 1) robust_list_set_op_pending(mutex); 2) robust_list_remove(mutex); lval = gettid(); 3) if (atomic_try_cmpxchg(&mutex->lock, lval, 0)) 4) robust_list_clear_op_pending(); else 5) sys_futex(OP | FUTEX_ROBUST_UNLOCK, ....); That still leaves a minimal race window between #3 and #4 where the mutex could be acquired by some other task, which observes that it is the last user and: 1) unmaps the mutex memory 2) maps a different file, which ends up covering the same address When then the original task exits before reaching #5 then the kernel robust list handling observes the pending op entry and tries to fix up user space. In case that the newly mapped data contains the TID of the exiting thread at the address of the mutex/futex the kernel will set the owner died bit in that memory and therefore corrupt unrelated data. On X86 this boils down to this simplified assembly sequence: mov %esi,%eax // Load TID into EAX xor %ecx,%ecx // Set ECX to 0 #3 lock cmpxchg %ecx,(%rdi) // Try the TID -> 0 transition .Lstart: jnz .Lend #4 movq %rcx,(%rdx) // Clear list_op_pending .Lend: If the cmpxchg() succeeds and the task is interrupted before it can clear list_op_pending in the robust list head (#4) and the task crashes in a signal handler or gets killed then it ends up in do_exit() and subsequently in the robust list handling, which then might run into the unmap/map issue described above. This is only relevant when user space was interrupted and a signal is pending. The fix-up has to be done before signal delivery is attempted because: 1) The signal might be fatal so get_signal() ends up in do_exit() 2) The signal handler might crash or the task is killed before returning from the handler. At that point the instruction pointer in pt_regs is not longer the instruction pointer of the initially interrupted unlock sequence. The right place to handle this is in __exit_to_user_mode_loop() before invoking arch_do_signal_or_restart() as this covers obviously both scenarios. As this is only relevant when the task was interrupted in user space, this is tied to RSEQ and the generic entry code as RSEQ keeps track of user space interrupts unconditionally even if the task does not have a RSEQ region installed. That makes the decision very lightweight: if (current->rseq.user_irq && within(regs, csr->unlock_ip_range)) futex_fixup_robust_unlock(regs, csr); futex_fixup_robust_unlock() then invokes a architecture specific function to return the pending op pointer or NULL. The function evaluates the register content to decide whether the pending ops pointer in the robust list head needs to be cleared. Assuming the above unlock sequence, then on x86 this decision is the trivial evaluation of the zero flag: return regs->eflags & X86_EFLAGS_ZF ? regs->dx : NULL; Other architectures might need to do more complex evaluations due to LLSC, but the approach is valid in general. The size of the pointer is determined from the matching range struct, which covers both 32-bit and 64-bit builds including COMPAT. The unlock sequence is going to be placed in the VDSO so that the kernel can keep everything synchronized, especially the register usage. The resulting code sequence for user space is: if (__vdso_futex_robust_list$SZ_try_unlock(lock, tid, &pending_op) != tid) err = sys_futex($OP | FUTEX_ROBUST_UNLOCK,....); Both the VDSO unlock and the kernel side unlock ensure that the pending_op pointer is always cleared when the lock becomes unlocked. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@igalia.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260602090535.773669210@kernel.org
walking-machine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 25, 2026
When the FUTEX_ROBUST_UNLOCK mechanism is used for unlocking (PI-)futexes, then the unlock sequence in userspace looks like this: 1) robust_list_set_op_pending(mutex); 2) robust_list_remove(mutex); lval = gettid(); 3) if (atomic_try_cmpxchg(&mutex->lock, lval, 0)) 4) robust_list_clear_op_pending(); else 5) sys_futex(OP,...FUTEX_ROBUST_UNLOCK); That still leaves a minimal race window between #3 and #4 where the mutex could be acquired by some other task which observes that it is the last user and: 1) unmaps the mutex memory 2) maps a different file, which ends up covering the same address When then the original task exits before reaching #5 then the kernel robust list handling observes the pending op entry and tries to fix up user space. In case that the newly mapped data contains the TID of the exiting thread at the address of the mutex/futex the kernel will set the owner died bit in that memory and therefore corrupt unrelated data. Provide a VDSO function which exposes the critical section window in the VDSO symbol table. The resulting addresses are updated in the task's mm when the VDSO is (re)map()'ed. The core code detects when a task was interrupted within the critical section and is about to deliver a signal. It then invokes an architecture specific function which determines whether the pending op pointer has to be cleared or not. The unlock assembly sequence on 64-bit is: mov %esi,%eax // Load TID into EAX xor %ecx,%ecx // Set ECX to 0 lock cmpxchg %ecx,(%rdi) // Try the TID -> 0 transition .Lstart: jnz .Lend movq %rcx,(%rdx) // Clear list_op_pending .Lend: ret So the decision can be simply based on the ZF state in regs->flags. The pending op pointer is always in DX independent of the build mode (32/64-bit) to make the pending op pointer retrieval uniform. The size of the pointer is stored in the matching criticial section range struct and the core code retrieves it from there. So the pointer retrieval function does not have to care. It is bit-size independent: return regs->flags & X86_EFLAGS_ZF ? regs->dx : NULL; There are two entry points to handle the different robust list pending op pointer size: __vdso_futex_robust_list64_try_unlock() __vdso_futex_robust_list32_try_unlock() The 32-bit VDSO provides only __vdso_futex_robust_list32_try_unlock(). The 64-bit VDSO provides always __vdso_futex_robust_list64_try_unlock() and when COMPAT is enabled also the list32 variant, which is required to support multi-size robust list pointers used by gaming emulators. The unlock function is inspired by an idea from Mathieu Desnoyers. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@igalia.com> Acked-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260311185409.1988269-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260602090535.883796247@kernel.org
walking-machine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 25, 2026
tl;dr: Use stop_machine() and a state machine based on the "MULTI_STOP" pattern to implement core TDX module update logic. Long version: TDX module updates require careful synchronization with other TDX operations. The requirements are (#1/#2 reflect current behavior that must be preserved): 1. SEAMCALLs need to be callable from both process and IRQ contexts. 2. SEAMCALLs need to be able to run concurrently across CPUs 3. During updates, only update-related SEAMCALLs are permitted; all other SEAMCALLs shouldn't be called. 4. During updates, all online CPUs must participate in the update work. No single lock primitive satisfies all requirements. For instance, rwlock_t handles #1/#2 but fails #4: CPUs spinning with IRQs disabled cannot be directed to perform update work. Use stop_machine() as it is the only well-understood mechanism that can meet all requirements. And TDX module updates consist of several steps (See Intel Trust Domain Extensions (Intel TDX) Module Base Architecture Specification, Chapter "TD-Preserving TDX module Update"). Ordering requirements between steps mandate lockstep synchronization across all CPUs. multi_cpu_stop() provides a good example of executing a multi-step task in lockstep across CPUs, but it does not synchronize the individual steps inside the callback itself. Implement a similar state machine as the skeleton for TDX module updates. Each state represents one step in the update flow, and the state advances only after all CPUs acknowledge completion of the current step. This acknowledgment mechanism provides the required lockstep execution. The update flow is intentionally simpler than multi_cpu_stop() in two ways: a) use a spinlock to protect the control data instead of atomic_t and explicit memory barriers. b) omit touch_nmi_watchdog() and rcu_momentary_eqs(), which exist there for debugging and are not strictly needed for this update flow Potential alternative to stop_machine() ======================================= An alternative approach is to lock all KVM entry points and kick all vCPUs. Here, KVM entry points refer to KVM VM/vCPU ioctl entry points, implemented in KVM common code (virt/kvm). Adding a locking mechanism there would affect all architectures KVM supports. And to lock only TDX vCPUs, new logic would be needed to identify TDX vCPUs, which the KVM common code currently lacks. This would add significant complexity and maintenance overhead to KVM for this TDX-specific use case, so don't take this approach. [ dhansen: normal changelog/style munging ] Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Lindgren <tony.lindgren@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta) <kas@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260520133909.409394-15-chao.gao@intel.com
walking-machine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 25, 2026
…ernel/git/ath/ath Jeff Johnson says: ================== ath.git patches for v7.2 (PR #4) An assortment of cleanups and minor bug fixes across wcn36xx, ath9k, ath10k, ath11k, and ath12k. ================== Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Use page_pool buffers by the means of libeth in the Rx queues, this significantly reduces code complexity of the driver itself. Suggested-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>
Implement XDP support for received fragmented packets, this requires using some helpers from libeth_xdp. Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>
Use libeth to support XDP_TX action for segmented packets. Reviewed-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>
To fully support XDP_REDIRECT, utilize more libeth helpers in XDP Rx path, hence save cached_ntu in the ring structure instead of stack. ixgbevf-supported VFs usually have few queues, so use libeth_xdpsq_lock functionality for XDP queue sharing. Adjust filling-in of XDP Tx descriptors to use data from xdp frame. Otherwise, simply use libeth helpers to implement .ndo_xdp_xmit(). While at it, fix a typo in libeth docs. Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>
Introduce pseudo header split support in the ixgbevf driver, specifically targeting ixgbe_mac_82599_vf. On older hardware (e.g. ixgbe_mac_82599_vf), RX DMA write size can only be limited in 1K increments. This causes issues when attempting to fit multiple packets per page, as a DMA write may overwrite the headroom of the next packet. To address this, introduce pseudo header split support, where the hardware copies the full L2 header into a dedicated header buffer. This avoids the need for HR/TR alignment and allows safe skb construction from the header buffer without risking overwrites. Given that once packet is too big to fit into a single page, the behaviour is the same for all supported HW, use pseudo header split only for smaller packets. Signed-off-by: Natalia Wochtman <natalia.wochtman@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com> Co-developed-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>
Currently, when MTU is changed, page pool is not reconfigured, which leads to usage of suboptimal buffer sizes. Always destroy page pool when cleaning the ring up and create it anew when we first allocate Rx buffers. Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>
xskxceiver attempts to change MTU after attaching XDP program, ixgbevf rejects the request leading to test being failed. Support MTU change operation even when XDP program is already attached, perform the same frame size check as when attaching a program. Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>
AF_XDP ZC Rx path is also required to implement skb creation. Move all common functions to a header file as inlines. Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>
Implement xsk_buff_pool configuration and supporting functionality, such as a single queue pair reconfiguration. Also, properly initialize Rx buffers. Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>
Add code that handles Tx ZC queues inside of napi_poll(), utilize libeth. As NIC's multiple buffer conventions do not play nicely with AF_XDP's, leave handling of segments for later. Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>
Add code that handles AF_XDP ZC Rx queues inside of napi_poll(), utilize libeth helpers. Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>
To finalize basic AF_XDP implementation, set features and add .ndo_xsk_wakeup() handler. Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>
Transmitting multi-buffer AF_XDP packets is not very straightforward given HW limitations in ixgbevf, namely that the first data descriptor must contain the length of the whole packet. Use private data of an sqe to store the length of an unfinished packet so far and the first descriptor index. Once EoP zero-copy descriptor is processed, write the accumulated length into the saved first descriptor. Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>
25ec6fa to
3176c41
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.