Add bit iteration benchmarks

[robert3005]

Add benchmarks for bitbuffer iteration methods

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

⚡ 2 improved benchmarks
❌ 1 regressed benchmark
✅ 1594 untouched benchmarks
🆕 43 new benchmarks
⏩ 4 skipped benchmarks¹

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
❌	Simulation	slice_empty_vortex	339.4 ns	397.8 ns	-14.66%
⚡	Simulation	bitwise_not_vortex_buffer_mut[128]	244.4 ns	215.3 ns	+13.55%
⚡	Simulation	bitwise_not_vortex_buffer_mut[1024]	304.7 ns	275.6 ns	+10.58%
🆕	Simulation	execute_mask_then_value[1024]	N/A	8.8 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	execute_mask_then_value[256]	N/A	12.5 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	is_valid_per_element[1024]	N/A	186.5 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	is_valid_per_element[256]	N/A	48.5 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	filter_run_end[len=16384_run=16_density=0.1]	N/A	89 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	filter_run_end[len=16384_run=16_density=0.5]	N/A	88.3 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	filter_run_end[len=16384_run=16_density=0.9]	N/A	87.9 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	filter_run_end[len=4096_run=16_density=0.1]	N/A	73.2 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	filter_run_end[len=4096_run=16_density=0.5]	N/A	27.9 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	filter_run_end[len=4096_run=16_density=0.9]	N/A	27.9 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	many_indices[(16384, 0.1)]	N/A	51.1 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	many_indices[(16384, 0.9)]	N/A	51.1 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	slice_bounds[(16384, 0.1)]	N/A	38.7 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	slice_bounds[(16384, 0.9)]	N/A	38.7 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	bit_iterator[(16384, 0.01)]	N/A	64.3 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	bit_iterator[(16384, 0.1)]	N/A	73.8 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	bit_iterator[(16384, 0.5)]	N/A	114.2 µs	N/A
...	...	...	...	...	...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

---

_{Comparing rk/bititerbenches (adeecae) with develop (5e656ee)}

Footnotes

1. 4 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩