Faster str interning - #8459
2 benchmarks regressed
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚡ 4 improved benchmarks
❌ 2 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1539 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 10 skipped benchmarks1
Warning
Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | Simulation | decompress_rd[f64, (100000, 0.0)] |
845.4 µs | 1,024 µs | -17.45% |
| ❌ | Simulation | decompress_rd[f32, (100000, 0.0)] |
498.8 µs | 586.5 µs | -14.96% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | decompress_rd[f64, (100000, 0.01)] |
981.1 µs | 845.4 µs | +16.05% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | decompress_rd[f64, (100000, 0.1)] |
981 µs | 845.4 µs | +16.04% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | bitwise_not_vortex_buffer_mut[128] |
215.3 ns | 186.1 ns | +15.67% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | bitwise_not_vortex_buffer_mut[1024] |
275.6 ns | 246.4 ns | +11.84% |
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing adamg/inline-str-interner (3ca882a) with develop (170ff39)
Footnotes
-
10 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩