ci: gate cuda san on cuda changes - #8438
2 benchmarks regressed
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚡ 6 improved benchmarks
❌ 2 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1537 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 10 skipped benchmarks1
Warning
Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | Simulation | decompress_rd[f64, (100000, 0.01)] |
845.4 µs | 981 µs | -13.82% |
| ❌ | Simulation | decompress_rd[f64, (100000, 0.1)] |
845.4 µs | 980.9 µs | -13.81% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | decompress_rd[f64, (100000, 0.0)] |
1,024.1 µs | 845.2 µs | +21.16% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | decompress_rd[f32, (100000, 0.0)] |
586.5 µs | 498.9 µs | +17.55% |
| ⚡ | WallTime | cuda/bitpacked_u8/unpack/3bw[100M] |
352 µs | 300.5 µs | +17.15% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | bitwise_not_vortex_buffer_mut[128] |
244.4 ns | 215.3 ns | +13.55% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | encode_varbin[(1000, 2)] |
176.3 µs | 158.2 µs | +11.45% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | bitwise_not_vortex_buffer_mut[1024] |
304.7 ns | 275.6 ns | +10.58% |
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing ji/skip-extra-ci (2f66724) with develop (9c4e0e4)
Footnotes
-
10 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩