Skip to content

fix: 2 improvements across 2 files#807

Open
tomaioo wants to merge 2 commits into
vllm-project:mainfrom
tomaioo:improve/quality/typo-in-docstring-liklihood
Open

fix: 2 improvements across 2 files#807
tomaioo wants to merge 2 commits into
vllm-project:mainfrom
tomaioo:improve/quality/typo-in-docstring-liklihood

Conversation

@tomaioo

@tomaioo tomaioo commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

fix: 2 improvements across 2 files

Problem

Severity: Low | File: src/speculators/proposals/greedy.py:L75

The accept_tolerance field description in GreedyTokenProposalConfig contains a typo: 'liklihood' should be 'likelihood'.

Solution

Correct the spelling of 'likelihood' in the docstring.

Changes

  • src/speculators/proposals/greedy.py (modified)
  • src/speculators/models/peagle/attention.py (modified)

tomaioo added 2 commits July 17, 2026 11:33
- Quality: Typo in docstring: 'liklihood'
- Quality: Typo in docstring: 'sequnce'

Signed-off-by: tomaioo <203048277+tomaioo@users.noreply.github.com>
- Quality: Typo in docstring: 'liklihood'
- Quality: Typo in docstring: 'sequnce'

Signed-off-by: tomaioo <203048277+tomaioo@users.noreply.github.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 584d51b4-c577-453c-8d44-f315de579903

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1afb3b2 and 4d72c2a.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/speculators/models/peagle/attention.py
  • src/speculators/proposals/greedy.py

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Changes

Documentation corrections

Layer / File(s) Summary
Correct explanatory text
src/speculators/models/peagle/attention.py, src/speculators/proposals/greedy.py
Corrects “sequnce” to “sequence” and “liklihood” to “likelihood” in descriptive text only.
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title is related to the change, but it is too vague and does not say what was fixed. Use a concise, specific title that names the docstring typo fixes in greedy.py and peagle/attention.py.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description check ✅ Passed The description matches the changeset and clearly describes the typo fixes in both files.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@fynnsu fynnsu left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! Please fix DCO

@fynnsu fynnsu added the ready This PR is ready for review label Jul 17, 2026
@rahul-tuli

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

We are good to land this once the diff is rebased, and DCO is fixed! Thanks for your contribution

@mergify

mergify Bot commented Jul 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merge Protections

🟢 Merge protection satisfied — ready to merge.

Show 1 satisfied protection

🟢 Require approval from approved reviewers list

All pull requests must have at least one approving review from a member of the approved reviewers list before merging.

  • any of:
    • approved-reviews-by = fynnsu
    • approved-reviews-by = rahul-tuli
    • approved-reviews-by = dsikka
    • approved-reviews-by = orestis-z
    • approved-reviews-by = shanjiaz

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ready This PR is ready for review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants