Skip to content

Switch nullifier PIR to Ironwood#113

Merged
czarcas7ic merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
adam/ironwood-nullifiers
Jul 17, 2026
Merged

Switch nullifier PIR to Ironwood#113
czarcas7ic merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
adam/ironwood-nullifiers

Conversation

@czarcas7ic

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Switches ingestion from Orchard to Ironwood compact actions and makes Ironwood dataset identity mandatory across raw artifacts, snapshots, clients, and fleet workflows. Legacy artifacts fail closed and require one explicit reset; sync also requires Ironwood-capable lightwalletd endpoints. The Mainnet activation gate uses the current proposed NU6.3 height.

@czarcas7ic
czarcas7ic marked this pull request as ready for review July 16, 2026 22:30

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: d79f6cc2d0

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread nf-ingest/src/sync_nullifiers.rs
@czarcas7ic

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

@czarcas7ic
czarcas7ic force-pushed the adam/ironwood-nullifiers branch from 0031a66 to f9f8bde Compare July 17, 2026 00:51
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Swish!

Reviewed commit: 0031a660f4

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@czarcas7ic
czarcas7ic merged commit f144b7d into main Jul 17, 2026
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant