Add via-in-pad autorouter configuration - #665
Closed
AnasSarkiz wants to merge 2 commits into
Closed
Conversation
AnasSarkiz
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 27, 2026 15:08
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
allow_via_in_padtopcb_group.autorouter_configurationWhy
Via-in-pad routing can add fabrication cost, so downstream autorouters need an explicit opt-in that survives Circuit JSON serialization. Omitted or
falseremains disabled; only an explicittruewill enable the downstream behavior.This is the Circuit JSON companion to tscircuit/props#759.
Compatibility
The new field is optional and backward-compatible.
Validation
bun test— 271 pass, 0 failbunx tsc --noEmitbun run buildbun run lint:zodbun run check-snake-casebun run generate-docs