Skip to content

feat: Add enhanced workflow examples and comprehensive CODEOWNERS demonstration#1

Merged
tmbtech merged 8 commits into
mainfrom
add-enhanced-workflows
Aug 29, 2025
Merged

feat: Add enhanced workflow examples and comprehensive CODEOWNERS demonstration#1
tmbtech merged 8 commits into
mainfrom
add-enhanced-workflows

Conversation

@tmbtech

@tmbtech tmbtech commented Aug 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

🎯 Overview

This PR adds comprehensive workflow examples that serve as:

  • Testing workflows with matrix scenarios
  • Template workflows for external repository usage
  • Demo workflows for interactive demonstrations

📁 Files Added

  • Matrix testing with 6 different scenarios (docs-only, config-only, source-only, etc.)
  • Debug logging enabled by default
  • Artifacts generation for all action outputs
  • Comprehensive test summaries

  • Exhaustively commented template for external repos
  • Shows best practices for permissions, triggers, conditions
  • Includes complete example CODEOWNERS file in comments
  • Built-in troubleshooting guide

  • 4 interactive demo jobs with different ownership patterns
  • Manual trigger support via workflow_dispatch
  • Temporary CODEOWNERS files for each scenario
  • Educational summaries explaining each pattern

📝 Files Enhanced

  • Added comprehensive examples for frontend, backend, devops, security teams
  • Extensive comments explaining pattern matching rules
  • Demonstrates complex scenarios like multi-team requirements
  • Includes demonstration patterns for edge cases

  • New "📜 Example Workflows" section with detailed explanations
  • Usage instructions for each workflow type
  • Guide for interpreting results and artifacts
  • Copy-paste instructions for external usage

🧪 Testing

All workflows are designed to work in this repository context:

  • Use for local action testing
  • Include proper permissions and Node.js setup
  • Follow existing conventions from

📊 Benefits

  1. For Maintainers: Comprehensive testing matrix ensures action works across scenarios
  2. For Users: Clear template with all options documented
  3. For Demos: Interactive workflows perfect for showcasing functionality
  4. For Learning: Extensive examples and comments for understanding patterns

The workflows demonstrate all three purposes requested: testing, templating, and demonstration.

…onstration

- Add test-codeowners-enforcement.yml: matrix testing with multiple scenarios
- Add template-external-usage.yml: comprehensive template for external repos
- Add demo-scenarios.yml: interactive demo workflow with different patterns
- Enhanced .github/CODEOWNERS with extensive examples and comments
- Updated README.md with new Example Workflows section
- All workflows demonstrate testing, templating, and educational use cases
- Add @vercel/ncc for proper GitHub Actions bundling
- Update build script to use ncc bundling
- Fix JavaScript syntax error in demo workflow (context variable conflict)
- Rebuild dist/index.js with all dependencies included
- Ensure workflows can execute the action properly
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👥 Code Owners Approval Status

0/5 required code owner groups have approved.

Required Approvals:

  • @Admin-Team (pending)

    • .github/CODEOWNERS
    • .github/workflows/demo-scenarios.yml
    • .github/workflows/template-external-usage.yml
    • .github/workflows/test-codeowners-enforcement.yml
  • @delavrx1 (pending)

    • dist/index.js.map
  • @devops-team (pending)

    • package.json
    • tsconfig.json
    • yarn.lock
  • @Docs-Team (pending)

    • README.md
  • @frontend-team (pending)

    • dist/__tests__/setup.d.ts
    • dist/approval-checker.d.ts
    • dist/bot.d.ts
    • dist/changed-files.d.ts
    • dist/codeowners.d.ts
    • ... and 9 more files

This comment is automatically updated by the Dynamic Code Owners Reviewer Bot

- Replace double-escaped \\n with proper \n line breaks in createCheckDetails()
- Fix PR comment formatting to use proper newlines
- Add empty lines for better readability in status check details
- This resolves the issue where raw \n characters were appearing in GitHub status check details
The CI was failing because TypeScript declaration maps (.d.ts.map files)
contained absolute paths that differed between local development and CI
environments. Since we're using @vercel/ncc for bundling, we don't need
the declaration maps from TypeScript compilation.

Changes:
- Disabled declarationMap in tsconfig.json
- Removed existing .d.ts.map files
- Rebuilt dist files without declaration maps

This should resolve the 'uncommitted changes after build' CI error.
The demo scenarios were failing because the code was using cached CODEOWNERS
data from the GitHub API instead of reading the temporary files created by
the workflow steps. This caused all scenarios to use the original complex
CODEOWNERS file instead of the simplified test scenarios.

Changes:
- Added detection for demo scenarios via DEMO_SCENARIO environment variable
- Added filesystem reading function for CODEOWNERS in demo mode
- Bypass cache when running demo scenarios to ensure fresh data
- Import fs and path modules for filesystem operations

This fix allows each demo scenario to use its own temporary CODEOWNERS file:
- Single owner scenarios with simplified patterns
- Multi-owner requirements for specific files
- Mixed ownership with complex patterns
- No-owner scenarios for certain file types
The demo summary job was failing with 'Cannot read properties of undefined
(reading 'login')' because it was trying to access
githubContext.repository.owner.login which doesn't exist in the GitHub
context structure.

Changes:
- Removed the problematic createWorkflowDispatch call that was causing the error
- Simplified the summary to use available GitHub context properties
- Fixed the summary script to avoid undefined property access
- Added current run information using accessible context properties

This resolves the TypeError and allows the demo scenarios workflow to
complete successfully with a proper summary report.
The path module was imported but never used in codeowners.ts, causing
ESLint errors. Removed the unused import to clean up the code and pass
linting checks.
@tmbtech tmbtech merged commit 5d4b88f into main Aug 29, 2025
13 of 15 checks passed
@tmbtech tmbtech deleted the add-enhanced-workflows branch August 29, 2025 21:06
@tmbtech

tmbtech commented Aug 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

fixes #2

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant