Skip to content

Add satellite flavor for downstream deployments #628

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
zjhuntin wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
+11 −0
Open

Add satellite flavor for downstream deployments #628

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions src/playbooks/deploy/metadata.obsah.yaml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ variables:
help: Base flavor to use in this deployment.
choices:
- katello
- satellite
external_authentication:
help: External authentication method to use
choices:
Expand Down
10 changes: 10 additions & 0 deletions src/vars/flavors/satellite.yml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
---
flavor_features:
- foreman
- katello
Comment on lines +3 to +4

@Gauravtalreja1 Gauravtalreja1 Jul 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

foreman-proxy feature can be added to this list

@evgeni evgeni Jul 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

as with hammer, I think that is something people should be actively opt in for?
content distribution to external proxies works without the feature, so in many architectures it won't be needed

@zjhuntin zjhuntin Jul 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

for now I do not have foreman-proxy enabled by default.

@Gauravtalreja1 Gauravtalreja1 Jul 8, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it should be identical to what we've currently with rpm based installations and we should have similar features pre-enabled on satellite deploy for existing users, where foreman-proxy and hammer are enabled by default
@ekohl @vijay8451 wdyt?

@ekohl ekohl Jul 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I do think that.

- content/ansible
- content/container
- content/rpm
- remote-execution
- rh-cloud
- theme-satellite