add padding for Vulnerabilities host details tab

[jeremylenz]

What are the changes introduced in this pull request?

Considerations taken when implementing this change?

What are the testing steps for this pull request?

Summary by Sourcery

Add consistent padding to the Vulnerabilities host details tab by introducing a new SCSS file and importing it into the component.

Enhancements:

• Introduce CVEsHostDetailsTab.scss to apply 24px padding to the host details component
• Import the new SCSS file into CVEsHostDetailsTab.js to activate the styling

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide

This PR enhances the CVEs host details tab by importing a new SCSS file and applying a 24px padding rule to its root container.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Added 24px padding styling to the host details component	Imported the new SCSS file into the component Created the SCSS file defining the 24px padding rule	webpack/CVEsHostDetailsTab/CVEsHostDetailsTab.js webpack/CVEsHostDetailsTab/CVEsHostDetailsTab.scss

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @jeremylenz - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[chris1984]

Code looks good to me, is there a box I can test it on?

[jeremylenz]

is there a box I can test it on?

@vkrizan can help with that

[jeremylenz]

Actually I think you can just look at the host details Vulnerabilities tab (with IoP on) and make sure the Scalprum placeholder is padded.

[chris1984]

Actually I think you can just look at the host details Vulnerabilities tab (with IoP on) and make sure the Scalprum placeholder is padded.

I don't have IOP on my devel box, I just have been using the test system. Can I test it on that one or are people still doing things with it?

[jeremylenz]

Aleksandr is testing with that one

[Gauravtalreja1]

I think this might address @vkrizan 's earlier comment, and here’s how it looks now. Could you please confirm if this aligns with what was expected?

[ShimShtein]

@MariSvirik Can you please take a look at the last screenshot?

[chris1984]

Looks good to me

[MariSvirik]

Yep, padding looks as expected.

But the tabs aren't ok according to PF5. The blue underline (of the selected tab) should be integrated with a horizontal grey line beneath all the tabs. See PF5 guidelines. But that's the Satellite issue not Vulnerabilities.

[jeremylenz]

But the tabs aren't ok according to PF5. The blue underline (of the selected tab) should be integrated with a horizontal grey line beneath all the tabs. See PF5 guidelines.

Opened https://projects.theforeman.org/issues/38623