Begin documenting a basic review process#86
Open
Gnuxie wants to merge 7 commits into
Open
Conversation
Gnuxie
commented
Nov 22, 2025
Gnuxie
force-pushed
the
gnuxie/contribution-risk
branch
from
728b7a0 to
c43ddae
Compare
FSG-Cat
approved these changes
Dec 12, 2025
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Cat is mostly happy with this especially as it makes it clear we cant accept AI crap due to the ethical restraints put on us by NLnet and tbh they are right. AI can not be ethically used most likely in FOSS due to the fact that most AI will happily regurgitate foss without the correct attribution.
Edit: Mostly is not negative its more Cat isnt invested enough to be like super hyped. Its decent work.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rendered
This is specifically being developed because of the-draupnir-project/Draupnir#990 (comment). We observe that the most controversial thing about the recent use of LLMs in KeePassXC was actually outlying the flimsiness of their review process, not that LLM assisted (or driven or whatever) contributions were being made.
So, rather than create a policy centred specifically on LLM usage, i think a policy on reviewing contributions in general needs to come first.