track SLM copy#17
Open
jiyang1011 wants to merge 7 commits into
Open
Conversation
jiyang1011
force-pushed
the
jiyang/SLM
branch
from
December 4, 2025 02:07
245578c to
2c930c0
Compare
jiyang1011
force-pushed
the
jiyang/SLM
branch
2 times, most recently
from
December 5, 2025 08:25
bb02a4a to
565cfe0
Compare
jiyang1011
force-pushed
the
jiyang/SLM
branch
from
December 5, 2025 08:46
565cfe0 to
ab39279
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
data 4K x 4K uint32_t in which performance is stable.
naive SLM copy:
Performance: [28.364]Gb/s (0.0024)ms ? this result is suspicious
Pure block 2d copy:
NEW version API:
Performance: [2.268]Gb/s (0.0296)ms
OLD version API:
Performance: [2.484]Gb/s (0.0270)ms
vectorized SLM + old API copy:
Performance: [2.084]Gb/s (0.0322)ms
vectorized SLM + new API copy:
Performance: [2.076]Gb/s (0.0323)ms
1D SLM copy:
I tried to enable Swizzle in data storage, but no significant compact on it.