Skip to content

Done with Hash Map 1#2301

Open
RitikaC1 wants to merge 4 commits into
super30admin:masterfrom
RitikaC1:master
Open

Done with Hash Map 1#2301
RitikaC1 wants to merge 4 commits into
super30admin:masterfrom
RitikaC1:master

Conversation

@RitikaC1

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@super30admin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Grouping Anagrams Together (problem1.py)

Strengths:

  • Clear problem-solving approach with two different methods
  • Good use of comments to explain the logic
  • Clean and readable code structure
  • Correct handling of edge cases

Areas for Improvement:

  • The space complexity claim of O(1) is incorrect. Since the output must contain all N strings grouped together, the space complexity is O(N * K) for storing results.
  • The prime number approach (Approach 2) has potential overflow issues with long strings. Consider using addition with modulo to prevent this.
  • The commented-out code makes the solution look incomplete. Consider either implementing it fully or removing it.
  • The getHash method in Approach 2 should be properly indented within the class.

VERDICT: PASS


Isomorphic Strings (problem2.py)

Strengths:

  • Clean, readable implementation with good variable naming
  • Correct algorithm implementation matching the reference solution
  • Proper handling of both forward and backward mappings
  • Good use of Python idioms (in operator for dictionary membership checks)

Areas for Improvement:

  • Space complexity claim is incorrect - should be O(n) in worst case, not O(1)
  • Could add an early length check: if len(s) != len(t): return False for robustness
  • Consider adding docstring improvements to better document the algorithm

VERDICT: PASS


Word Pattern (problem3.py)

Strengths:

  • Good documentation with time/space complexity
  • Clean variable naming
  • Recognized the need for bidirectional mapping

Areas for Improvement:

  • The implemented approach 2 has a logical bug - the set-based approach doesn't correctly handle the bidirectional constraint
  • The commented-out approach 1 is actually the correct solution - using two hash maps for bidirectional checking is the right approach
  • Consider using the commented-out code as the final solution
  • The logic for adding to s_set is flawed - it should add the word when a NEW pattern character is encountered, not in the else branch

VERDICT: NEEDS_IMPROVEMENT

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants