Skip to content

Completed Competitive-Coding-2#1184

Open
ManasviReddy25 wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
ManasviReddy25:master
Open

Completed Competitive-Coding-2#1184
ManasviReddy25 wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
ManasviReddy25:master

Conversation

@ManasviReddy25

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@super30admin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Interview Problem : Two elements sum to target (Problem1.py)

Strengths:

  • Excellent implementation of the hash map approach, which is the optimal solution for this problem
  • Well-documented code with time/space complexity analysis
  • Clean, readable code with meaningful variable names
  • Comments effectively explain the logic
  • Includes LeetCode status and problem URL for reference

Areas for Improvement:

  • Using map as a variable name shadows Python's built-in map function. Consider using num_map or hash_map instead for better practice
  • The solution could include a brief docstring explaining the method's purpose and parameters
  • Could add a type hint for better code documentation (e.g., def twoSum(self, nums: List[int], target: int) -> List[int]:)

Minor Note:

  • The problem states "exactly one solution exists," but the code doesn't explicitly handle edge cases. However, this is acceptable since the problem guarantees exactly one solution.

VERDICT: PASS


Interview Problem: 0-1 Knapsack Problem (Problem2.py)

Strengths:

  • Demonstrates strong understanding of DP optimization by using 1D array instead of 2D
  • Excellent code documentation and readability
  • Correctly implements the right-to-left traversal pattern essential for 0-1 knapsack
  • Clean, concise implementation

Areas for Improvement:

  • The time complexity notation could be more precise: O(n*W) rather than O(W) to accurately reflect the nested loop structure
  • Could add input validation (e.g., checking that val and wt arrays have the same length)
  • Consider edge case handling for empty arrays or zero capacity

VERDICT: NEEDS_IMPROVEMENT

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants