Skip to content

working solution#1180

Open
avcode3 wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
avcode3:master
Open

working solution#1180
avcode3 wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
avcode3:master

Conversation

@avcode3

@avcode3 avcode3 commented May 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@super30admin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Interview Problem : Two elements sum to target (problem1.py)

Strengths:

  • Good attempt at optimizing from O(n²) to O(n) using a hash map
  • Clean variable naming overall
  • Proper docstring format

Areas for Improvement:

  1. Critical Bug: The logic is inverted. You store target-nums[i] as the key, but then check if nums[i] exists in the dict. This causes the algorithm to fail for cases like [3,2,4] with target=6.
  2. Logic Flow: The correct approach should be: for each element, check if its complement exists in the dict first, THEN add the current element's complement to the dict. Your current code checks after potentially adding, which breaks the algorithm.
  3. Code Clarity: The append-then-return pattern is confusing. Consider separating the lookup and insertion logic more clearly.
  4. Edge Cases: While the problem guarantees a solution, returning [] silently could hide bugs during testing. Consider using assertions or comments.

Corrected Logic Example:

for i in range(len(nums)):
    complement = target - nums[i]
    if complement in dict_field:  # Check first
        return [dict_field[complement], i]
    dict_field[nums[i]] = i  # Then store

VERDICT: NEEDS_IMPROVEMENT


Interview Problem: 0-1 Knapsack Problem

Strengths:

  • The Two Sum solution itself is reasonably well-written with good use of a dictionary for O(1) lookup
  • The code follows Python conventions and is readable
  • Proper handling of edge cases (returning empty list if no solution found)

Critical Issues:

  1. Wrong Problem: The submitted solution solves a completely different problem (Two Sum) than what was assigned (0-1 Knapsack)
  2. No Attempt at Knapsack: There is no evidence of understanding the knapsack problem requirements
  3. Missing Solution: The code doesn't address weights, values, capacity, or the optimization goal of the knapsack problem

To Improve:

  • First, ensure you understand the problem requirements before coding
  • For 0-1 Knapsack, you need to implement a 2D DP approach where dp[i][w] represents the maximum value achievable with first i items and capacity w
  • The recurrence relation should be: if weight[i-1] > w, then dp[i][w] = dp[i-1][w]; otherwise dp[i][w] = max(dp[i-1][w], profit[i-1] + dp[i-1][w-weight[i-1]])

VERDICT: NEEDS_IMPROVEMENT

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants