Skip to content

Fix hashed_partitioning recipe: correct copy-pasted Spicepod name - #559

Open
claudespice wants to merge 1 commit into
spiceai:trunkfrom
claudespice:fix/hashed-partitioning-pod-name
Open

Fix hashed_partitioning recipe: correct copy-pasted Spicepod name#559
claudespice wants to merge 1 commit into
spiceai:trunkfrom
claudespice:fix/hashed-partitioning-pod-name

Conversation

@claudespice

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

hashed_partitioning/spicepod.yaml declares name: duckdb-acceleration-qs — a leftover copied from the duckdb/accelerator recipe, which builds its app with spice init duckdb-acceleration-qs.

  • What the recipe said: Step 2 presents the configuration as name: hashed-partitioning.
  • What actually loads: Step 1 is git clone + cd cookbook/hashed_partitioning, and Step 3 is spice run — so the reader runs the shipped file, which announces itself as duckdb-acceleration-qs.
  • What changed: the shipped pod name now matches the README. One line; no dataset, connector, or acceleration setting was touched.

The two files were otherwise byte-identical, so this was the only divergence between what the README shows and what the recipe runs.

Verified against

spiceai/spiceai at v2.1.2. The pod name is a free-form label (crates/spicepod), so this is a naming/consistency fix rather than a runtime failure — the recipe's queries and partition-pruning plans are unaffected. The colliding name is legitimately owned by duckdb/accelerator/README.md:18.

Evidence

Static review only — confirmed by diffing the README's Step 2 YAML block against the committed spicepod.yaml; the pod name was the sole difference.

The shipped spicepod.yaml was named duckdb-acceleration-qs, a leftover from the
duckdb/accelerator recipe (which creates that app via 'spice init
duckdb-acceleration-qs'). This recipe is clone-and-run, so the pod the reader
actually loads contradicted the 'name: hashed-partitioning' shown in Step 2 of
its own README.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant