Skip to content

Revert temp counter workaround superseded by official fix#1975

Closed
StormLiangMS wants to merge 1 commit into
sonic-net:masterfrom
StormLiangMS:revert-temp-counter-workaround-1962
Closed

Revert temp counter workaround superseded by official fix#1975
StormLiangMS wants to merge 1 commit into
sonic-net:masterfrom
StormLiangMS:revert-temp-counter-workaround-1962

Conversation

@StormLiangMS

@StormLiangMS StormLiangMS commented Jul 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The temporary workaround from #1962 is superseded by the official fix in #1774.

A direct revert of #1962 is a no-op on current master because #1774 already removed the workaround behavior while adding the smart counter polling implementation. This PR records that the workaround has been intentionally retired and asks the original author to confirm.

Note: GitHub did not allow justin-wong-ce to be requested as a formal reviewer from this PR, so he was tagged in a PR comment instead.

The temporary workaround from PR sonic-net#1962 is superseded by the official fix in PR sonic-net#1774.\n\nA direct revert is a no-op on current master because PR sonic-net#1774 already removed the workaround behavior while adding the smart counter polling implementation.\n\nThis empty commit records that the workaround has been intentionally retired.\n\nRefs: https://github.com/sonic-net/sonic-sairedis/pull/1774\nRefs: sonic-net#1962

Signed-off-by: Storm Liang <stormliang@microsoft.com>
@mssonicbld

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

/azp run

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@StormLiangMS

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@justin-wong-ce could you please review/confirm this no-op revert record? The temp workaround from #1962 appears already removed by the official fix in #1774 on current master.

@StormLiangMS
StormLiangMS deleted the revert-temp-counter-workaround-1962 branch July 7, 2026 06:01
@justin-wong-ce

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@justin-wong-ce could you please review/confirm this no-op revert record? The temp workaround from #1962 appears already removed by the official fix in #1774 on current master.

Yes this is a no-op revert because the revert is already done in #1774

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants