[202511] Continue CMIS state even if Decommission fails#859
Merged
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Prince George <prgeor@microsoft.com>
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines: There may be pipelines that require an authorized user to comment /azp run to run. |
|
Azure Pipelines: Successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
mihirpat1
approved these changes
Jul 21, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
[202511] Cherry pick of #842
Motivation and Context
This PR moved the DP decommission to normal DP activation flow. Previously when there was a failure (some module DONT'T accept appl=0 even for DP decommission), the state machine used to proceed with the retry because on retry, the appl got set to the desired. This PR ignores the failure and continues the datapath initialization with the selected application anways (restoring the status quo for these modules)
How Has This Been Tested?
Validated this on the buggy module which was failing DP decommission.
Additional Information (Optional)