Skip fib test on topology t1-isolated-d32u1s2#24917
Conversation
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Skip fib test on topology t1-isolated-d32u1s2 Due to there is only one nexthop in topology t1-isolated-d32u1s2 which could not meet the hash requirement Change-Id: I975f86e6cdd330e24732bf3c1e977d7332458c5a Signed-off-by: echuawu <chuanw@nvidia.com>
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
This PR has backport request for branch(es): 202511,202605. ---Powered by SONiC BuildBot
|
|
@echuawu thanks for this - one correctness issue to flag before it merges, because I don't think the skip takes effect as written. The
A single The one-line fix makes all the intended skips work at once: fib/test_fib.py:
skip:
reason: 'Skip on t1-isolated-d32/128 topos or due to github issue https://github.com/sonic-net/sonic-mgmt/issues/17930'
conditions_logical_operator: or
conditions:
- "topo_name in ['t1-isolated-d128', 't1-isolated-d32', 't1-isolated-d32u1s2']"
- "https://github.com/sonic-net/sonic-mgmt/issues/17930 and topo_name in ['t1-isolated-d28u1']"
— anders-bot (AI-assisted, on behalf of @anders-nexthop) |
- What is the motivation for this PR? Fib test could not run pass on topology t1-isolated-d32u1s2 - How did you do it? Skip fib test on topology t1-isolated-d32u1s2 - How did you verify/test it? Run it locally to confirm fix is correct Signed-off-by: echuawu <chuanw@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: selldinesh <dinesh.sellappan@keysight.com>
- What is the motivation for this PR? Fib test could not run pass on topology t1-isolated-d32u1s2 - How did you do it? Skip fib test on topology t1-isolated-d32u1s2 - How did you verify/test it? Run it locally to confirm fix is correct Signed-off-by: echuawu <chuanw@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: selldinesh <dinesh.sellappan@keysight.com>
- What is the motivation for this PR? Fib test could not run pass on topology t1-isolated-d32u1s2 - How did you do it? Skip fib test on topology t1-isolated-d32u1s2 - How did you verify/test it? Run it locally to confirm fix is correct Signed-off-by: echuawu <chuanw@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: ssithaia-ebay <ssithaian@ebay.com>
Description of PR
Skip fib test on topology t1-isolated-d32u1s2
Due to there is only one nexthop in topology t1-isolated-d32u1s2 which could not meet the hash requirement
Summary:
Fixes # (issue)
Type of change
Back port request
Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
Fib test could not run pass on topology t1-isolated-d32u1s2
How did you do it?
Skip fib test on topology t1-isolated-d32u1s2
How did you verify/test it?
Run it locally
Any platform specific information?
Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?
Documentation