Document proofs include value for get_sheet

[smar-ivan-sandev]

Adds proofs to the documented valid include values for get_sheet, completing the proofs work started in #159.

The Proof model, Row.proof, and the get_report docstring already listed proofs (shipped in #159); the get_sheet docstring was the remaining gap. include is passed through, so include=['proofs'] already worked at runtime — this is a docs-only fix.

DEVECO-2197

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated the Sheets.get_sheet documentation to list proofs as a valid include option.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 9610fb85-8c1f-4497-9b62-a157c8b20279

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f57835f and 4dcee70.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• smartsheet/sheets.py

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The get_sheet docstring now lists proofs among the valid include parameter values. No request, response, or API behavior changed.

Changes

Sheet API documentation

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Update get_sheet include values smartsheet/sheets.py	The include parameter documentation now includes proofs as a valid value.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Suggested reviewers: astrinski-smartsheet, ggoranov-smar

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The description covers the basic change and rationale, but it misses most template sections like type, environment, testing, and checklist.	Add the missing template sections: Type of Change, Environment Information, What Changes Were Made, Testing, Checklist, and any Additional Notes.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title is concise and accurately summarizes the docs-only change to the get_sheet proofs include value.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch add-proofs-getsheet-docstring

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[coveralls]

Coverage Report for CI Build 29828647042

Warning

No base build found for commit f57835f on mainline.
Coverage changes can't be calculated without a base build.
If a base build is processing, this comment will update automatically when it completes.

Coverage: 77.908%

Details

• Patch coverage: No coverable lines changed in this PR.

Uncovered Changes

No uncovered changes found.

Coverage Regressions

Requires a base build to compare against. How to fix this →

---

Coverage Stats

Relevant Lines:	10963
Covered Lines:	8541
Line Coverage:	77.91%
Coverage Strength:	3.9 hits per line

---

💛 - Coveralls