Skip to content

simulating rolls for artifacts#14

Open
SohumB wants to merge 1 commit into
shrubin:masterfrom
SohumB:simulated_rolls
Open

simulating rolls for artifacts#14
SohumB wants to merge 1 commit into
shrubin:masterfrom
SohumB:simulated_rolls

Conversation

@SohumB

@SohumB SohumB commented Dec 31, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I haven't removed the rate function out of an abundance of caution, but as far as I can tell rate_np and rate should behave identically.

We currently only run sims for artifacts that have 4 substats already. It's possible but significantly more annoying to simulate substat generation rolls; ...also, how would you report it?

Performance is reasonable. compute takes on the order of 50ms, when it used to take on the order of 0.5ms. This should be indistinguishable given network latency, I think?

I haven't removed the rate function out of an abundance of caution,
but as far as I can tell rate_np and rate _should_ behave identically.

we currently only run sims for artifacts that have 4 substats already.
it's possible but significantly more annoying to simulate substat
generation rolls; also, how would you report it

performance is reasonable. compute takes on the order of 50ms, when
it used to take on the order of 0.5ms—i.e., should be indistinguishable
given network latency.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant