docs(review-suite): confirm the session-continuation-summary verification-only regression - #90
Merged
Conversation
…n-summary verification-only regression (#57 follow-up) ## Summary - Add `review-suite/evals/v2/session-continuation-summary-confirming-rerun.md` and its companion `.report.json`, reporting an independent 5-attempt rerun of the single `session-continuation-summary` case under the `verification-sufficiency-pass-only` ablation configuration. - Reproduce the exact reproduction mechanism `FROZEN-V2-CONFIGURATION.md` already documents: mirror the real `skills/` tree, overwrite `review-correctness/SKILL.md` with the committed `verification-only` overlay, and pass that copy as `--skill-root` to `runner.py`, scoped to a single-case corpus so only this one case (not the full 7-case stratum) is re-scored. - Result: 3 of 5 attempts reproduce the original run's 3/5 false-positive rate exactly, at the pinned runtime (`claude 2.1.92`) and model (`claude-opus-4-6[1m]`), with zero evaluation failures. Cost: $0.569074 against this ticket's own $1.00 ceiling. ## Why - `#57`'s own `S1-ABLATION-MATRIX.md` found this regression while the shared machine was under very heavy, unrelated load, and flagged it as small-sample (5 attempts) and worth an independent confirming rerun before anyone treats it as settled. This adds that confirmation, without modifying any existing #57 or earlier-ticket file and without deciding anything about `#52`/`#53`'s disposition. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
b4e061f):session-continuation-summaryregressed to 3/5 false positives under theverification-sufficiency-pass-onlyablation configuration, flagged as small-sample (5 attempts) and worth confirming before treating as settled.FROZEN-V2-CONFIGURATION.mdalready documents: mirror the realskills/tree, overwritereview-correctness/SKILL.mdwith the committedverification-onlyoverlay, pass as--skill-roottorunner.py.corr.verify-finalize-called), zero evaluation failures, runtime/model pin verified unchanged (claude 2.1.92,claude-opus-4-6[1m]).review-suite/evals/v2/session-continuation-summary-confirming-rerun.mdand its companion.report.json. No existing Run the preregistered review v2 ablation and integration closeout #57/earlier-ticket file,baseline/v1/, or#59frozen file is modified.Cost
Review
review-code-changecycle: solution-simplicity clean; correctness required one fix (soften an unverifiable-from-committed-JSON finding-ID citation to attribute it to direct observation) then re-checked clean; code-simplicity clean.Test plan
just formatjust lintjust testreview-code-changecycle (solution simplicity, correctness, code simplicity) — all clean after one correctness fix🤖 Generated with Claude Code