More progress on capture-checking stdlib - #26727
Draft
natsukagami wants to merge 10 commits into
Draft
Conversation
We had to make Source and Codec function variables non-capturing, but they seem like good choices anyway. Sources cannot be created from an impure Iterable, but doing that seems wrong anyways as `withReset` would re-create the iterator. Would be interesting to try making Console/StdIn a global capability.
In particular, we require numeric and comparison traits (Ordering, Ordered, Numeric, Equiv) to be pure.
Of note: `typeConstraints` needs some change.
ReferenceWrapper marked Pure, as it is supposed to wrap a generic reference.
natsukagami
force-pushed
the
cc-more-stdlib
branch
from
August 6, 2026 17:18
e8dfa2f to
a38d126
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Continuation of #25526
Have you relied on LLM-based tools in this contribution?
No
How was the solution tested?
Covered by existing tests