-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
Simplify downloads #4844
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
djc
wants to merge
12
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
simplify-downloads
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+361
−508
Open
Simplify downloads #4844
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5dc2eab
download: inline reqwest_be module contents
djc 1e1913e
download: move all imports to the top
djc 5ab9e2c
download: inline single-caller download_from_file_url() helper
djc 956bb2b
download: inline single-caller request() helper
djc 85fc3b0
download: inline single-caller env_proxy() helper
djc 3248ba5
download: use builder pattern to bundle up download input
djc ba2d418
download: rename Backend to Tls
djc 09d9923
self_update: avoid unnecessary DownloadCfg setup
djc 3588a38
download: extract DownloadOptions type
djc 552b29f
download: attach more functions to Download type
djc 8ad6cec
download: move download() to Download::execute()
djc cbd4f1e
download: replace callback with direct handling
djc File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: A common builder trick is to let
.with_foo()acceptimpl Into<Option<Foo>>so it can takefoo,Some(foo)andNoneat the same time. Hopefully this way the chain can be more readable here 🙏View changes since the review
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, not sure I love it. I like the added precision of the builder method exactly taking the thing (not the thing wrapped in
Option), and I don't mind this boilerplate so much -- while it's more verbose, it still seems still pretty straightforward to understand.