-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15k
Make Error::type_id() an inherent method on dyn Error
#156252
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Jules-Bertholet
wants to merge
1
commit into
rust-lang:main
Choose a base branch
from
Jules-Bertholet:error-typeid-inherent
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+27
−14
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What am I missing for why this doesn't allow users to unsoundly override this, i.e., the point of having the
private::Internalhere previously?View changes since the review
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's what the perma-unstable feature gate is for.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was an argument against allowing it to be just unstable in the original PR, that people using nightly can still make unsound things.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To make an unsound thing with this, you would have to not only use nightly, but also look through the source code, see the
doc(hidden)item, and then choose to enable the feature gate despite the warning. If you are that determined to shoot yourself in the foot, Rust cannot stop you, and there are plenty of other feature gates you could use instead. For example,pin!()used to rely on a feature gate much like this (removed by #139114).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think I agree, but the PR description reads like this addresses that soundness problem - it's not obvious to me how this is an improvement over what's on main right now...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
After this PR, the
fn type_id()method ondyn Errorcould be soundly stabilized, as it's impossible to override it. Only the__type_id()method on the trait itself needs to remain unstable, and that method is not particularly useful