Use readr::write_*(file =) instead of path#59
Merged
Conversation
jennybc
commented
Nov 20, 2025
Comment on lines
+83
to
+84
| write <- function(x, file, omit_header = FALSE) { | ||
| write_tsv(x = x, file = file, append = omit_header) |
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I imagine I'll make similar changes in vroom soon. Same deal.
Member
|
lovely, thanks for this! (I think |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
pathargument will be removed fromreadr::write_*()in its next release. It has been deprecated for over 5 years, since readr 1.4.0 (2020-01-31). Since that time, anypathvalue has just been passed along asfile, which is what this PR does.This is part of a bigger effort to advance a bunch of deprecation processes that started 4+ years ago: tidyverse/readr#1600. I released readr v2.1.6 on 2025-11-14 and have no immediate plans for another release. I just wanted to advanced these deprecations right away, to give downstream dependencies plenty of time to adjust.
I am also sending an email to the maintainer listed in DESCRIPTION.