build(deps): bump requests from 2.31.0 to 2.32.0 in /drivers/gpu/drm/ci/xfails#2
Open
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 30 commits into
Open
build(deps): bump requests from 2.31.0 to 2.32.0 in /drivers/gpu/drm/ci/xfails#2dependabot[bot] wants to merge 30 commits into
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 30 commits into
Conversation
This patch introduces Ponte Vecchio support in Xe driver. Please note that besides this patch, likely the force_probe still needs to be used in order to actually enable the support for PVC. This patch was separated from the rest so we can ensure compliance with DRM uAPI rules on compute platforms. Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Cc: Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@kernel.org> Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/1154 Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Add PVC GuC FW definition. This is patch is for CI-only and it is meant for the topic/core-for-CI branch. Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/1155 Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Add LNL GuC FW definition. This FW is not ready to be pushed to linux-firmware yet, so this patch is for CI-only and it is meant for the topic/core-for-CI branch. Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/1156 Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
As a lockmap takes a reference for every ww_mutex used together, this can be an arbitrarily large number and under control of userspace -- easily overflowing the arbitrary limit of 4096. However, the pin_count (used for detecting unexpected lock dropping) is a full 32b despite nesting being extremely rare (see lockdep_pin_lock). References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8028 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190425092004.9995-33-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> [Joonas: Converting to pin_count:11 as per addition of sync:1] Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@intel.com>
We have recently turned on ftrace-dump-on-oops for i915's CI and an issue we have encountered is that the trace buffer size greatly exceeds the pstore capabilities; we get the tail of the oops but not the introduction. Currently the global buffer size is controllable on the cmdline, but at the request of our CI sysadmin, we would like to add a control to the Kconfig as well. The rationale being the cmdline carries the temporary hacks that we want to eradicate, and we want to track the permanent configuration in .config. I have kept the Kconfig option hidden from the user as the default should suffice for the majority of users; reserving the configuration for those that eschew the cmdline option. v2: Add an expert prompt to stop the default value overriding .config changes. References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8029 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Most systems keep the last messages from the panic, and we value the stacktrace most, so dump it last in order to preserve it for post-mortems. References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8030 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180903131745.30593-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Under CI testing, it is common for the cpus to overheat with the continuous workloads and end up being throttled. As the cpus still function, it is less of a critical error meriting urgent action, but an expected yet significant condition (pr_note). References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8031 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8032 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com> [danvet: Rebase] Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Work around the following boot time crash: [ 10.456056] CPU: 1 PID: 220 Comm: systemd-udevd Tainted: G W 4.17.0-rc7-CI-CI_DRM_4040+ #182 [ 10.465828] Hardware name: Intel Corporation Ice Lake Client Platform/IceLake U DDR4 SODIMM PD RVP, BIOS +ICLSFWR1.R00.2204.A00.1805172221 05/17/2018 [ 10.479168] RIP: 0010:acpi_ps_complete_this_op+0xa7/0x22a [ 10.484627] RSP: 0018:ffffc900003a7578 EFLAGS: 00010202 [ 10.489881] RAX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RBX: ffff8804abeda9c8 RCX: 0000000000000020 [ 10.497045] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88049e604a68 RDI: 0000000000000000 [ 10.504213] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffff8804abeda9c8 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 10.511376] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 000000000000000e [ 10.518542] R13: ffff88049e604a68 R14: ffff88049e604a68 R15: ffffffffa00263c2 [ 10.525713] FS: 00007ff6d85f18c0(0000) GS:ffff8804be880000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 10.533839] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 10.539616] CR2: 00007ff6d73cff40 CR3: 000000049f794001 CR4: 0000000000760ee0 [ 10.546783] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 10.553949] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 10.561112] PKRU: 55555554 [ 10.563849] Call Trace: [ 10.566323] acpi_ps_complete_op+0x49/0x3f1 [ 10.570537] acpi_ps_parse_loop+0x94c/0x9bb [ 10.574754] ? acpi_ds_delete_walk_state+0x113/0x131 [ 10.579750] acpi_ps_parse_aml+0x1a2/0x4af [ 10.583875] acpi_ps_execute_method+0x1e9/0x2a5 [ 10.588435] acpi_ns_evaluate+0x2e4/0x42c [ 10.592473] acpi_evaluate_object+0x1fd/0x3a8 [ 10.596873] usb_acpi_find_companion+0xee/0x1f0 [usbcore] [ 10.602319] acpi_platform_notify+0x33/0xa0 [ 10.606532] device_add+0x197/0x600 [ 10.610048] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x36/0x50 [ 10.614529] usb_hub_create_port_device+0x11d/0x340 [usbcore] [ 10.620314] hub_probe+0x9a5/0x1010 [usbcore] [ 10.624701] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x51/0x60 [ 10.629730] usb_probe_interface+0x13f/0x300 [usbcore] [ 10.634900] driver_probe_device+0x302/0x470 [ 10.639198] ? __driver_attach+0xe0/0xe0 [ 10.643147] bus_for_each_drv+0x59/0x90 [ 10.647013] __device_attach+0xb7/0x130 [ 10.650878] bus_probe_device+0x9c/0xb0 [ 10.654745] device_add+0x3c5/0x600 [ 10.658270] usb_set_configuration+0x540/0x880 [usbcore] [ 10.663621] generic_probe+0x28/0x80 [usbcore] [ 10.668097] driver_probe_device+0x302/0x470 [ 10.672393] ? __driver_attach+0xe0/0xe0 [ 10.676346] bus_for_each_drv+0x59/0x90 [ 10.680211] __device_attach+0xb7/0x130 [ 10.684076] bus_probe_device+0x9c/0xb0 [ 10.687940] device_add+0x3c5/0x600 [ 10.691464] usb_new_device+0x269/0x490 [usbcore] [ 10.696206] usb_add_hcd+0x558/0x850 [usbcore] [ 10.700682] xhci_pci_probe+0x13d/0x240 [xhci_pci] [ 10.705534] pci_device_probe+0xa1/0x130 [ 10.709484] driver_probe_device+0x302/0x470 [ 10.713784] __driver_attach+0xb9/0xe0 [ 10.717562] ? driver_probe_device+0x470/0x470 [ 10.722033] ? driver_probe_device+0x470/0x470 [ 10.726505] bus_for_each_dev+0x64/0x90 [ 10.730370] ? preempt_count_sub+0x92/0xd0 [ 10.734495] bus_add_driver+0x164/0x260 [ 10.738362] ? 0xffffffffa004e000 [ 10.741704] driver_register+0x57/0xc0 [ 10.745482] ? 0xffffffffa004e000 [ 10.748824] do_one_initcall+0x4a/0x350 [ 10.752690] ? do_init_module+0x22/0x20a [ 10.756643] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x74/0x80 [ 10.761377] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x284/0x2e0 [ 10.766114] do_init_module+0x5b/0x20a [ 10.769895] load_module+0x250d/0x2b20 [ 10.773678] ? kernel_read+0x2c/0x40 [ 10.777285] ? __se_sys_finit_module+0xaa/0xc0 [ 10.781759] __se_sys_finit_module+0xaa/0xc0 [ 10.786061] do_syscall_64+0x54/0x190 [ 10.789752] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 10.794831] RIP: 0033:0x7ff6d74664d9 [ 10.798430] RSP: 002b:00007ffd91e7dd78 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000139 [ 10.806033] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000560519bfae20 RCX: 00007ff6d74664d9 [ 10.813195] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00007ff6d795ce23 RDI: 000000000000000e [ 10.820360] RBP: 00007ff6d795ce23 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 10.827523] R10: 000000000000000e R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 10.834690] R13: 0000560519bf9a30 R14: 0000000000020000 R15: 000000000aba9500 [ 10.841862] Code: c2 10 5f ea 81 48 c7 c6 f0 5e ea 81 bf 7c 00 00 00 e8 0d 7c 00 00 31 ed e9 88 01 00 00 48 8b 03 31 ed 48 85 c0 +0f 84 e9 00 00 00 <4c> 8b 60 28 4d 85 e4 0f 84 dc 00 00 00 0f b7 78 0a e8 62 fe ff [ 10.860832] RIP: acpi_ps_complete_this_op+0xa7/0x22a RSP: ffffc900003a7578 [ 10.867907] ---[ end trace 3a0d2ee1129bc71e ]--- References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8033 Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Tested-by: Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180702135756.12159-1-imre.deak@intel.com Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
There's the hung_task_panic sysctl, but that's a bit an extreme measure.
As a fallback taint at least the machine.
Our CI uses this to decide when a reboot is necessary, plus to figure
out whether the kernel is still happy.
v2: Works much better when I put the else { add_taint() } at the right
place.
References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8034
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Valdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc: "Liu, Chuansheng" <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (for core-for-CI)
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190502204648.5537-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
There's the soft/hardlookup_panic sysctls, but that's a bit an extreme measure. As a fallback taint at least the machine. Our CI uses this to decide when a reboot is necessary, plus to figure out whether the kernel is still happy. References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8035 Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Valdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu> Cc: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com> Cc: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com> Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> Cc: Sinan Kaya <okaya@kernel.org> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (for core-for-CI) Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190502194208.3535-2-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8036 Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2781 [danvet: Rebase] Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
We can't allow spam in CI. Update 26th June 2018: This is still an issue: Update 23rd May 2019: You guessed it, still ocurring. [ 224.739686] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 224.739712] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 2982 at net/sched/sch_generic.c:461 dev_watchdog+0x1fd/0x210 [ 224.739714] Modules linked in: vgem snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_hda_core x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp coretemp crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel snd_pcm i915 asix usbnet mii mei_me mei prime_numbers i2c_hid pinctrl_sunrisepoint pinctrl_intel btusb btrtl btbcm btintel bluetooth ecdh_generic [ 224.739775] CPU: 3 PID: 2982 Comm: gem_exec_suspen Tainted: G U W 4.18.0-rc2-CI-Patchwork_9414+ #1 [ 224.739777] Hardware name: Dell Inc. XPS 13 9350/, BIOS 1.4.12 11/30/2016 [ 224.739780] RIP: 0010:dev_watchdog+0x1fd/0x210 [ 224.739781] Code: 49 63 4c 24 f0 eb 92 4c 89 ef c6 05 21 46 ad 00 01 e8 77 ee fc ff 89 d9 48 89 c2 4c 89 ee 48 c7 c7 88 4c 14 82 e8 a3 fe 84 ff <0f> 0b eb be 0f 1f 44 00 00 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 48 c7 47 [ 224.739866] RSP: 0018:ffff88027dd83e40 EFLAGS: 00010286 [ 224.739869] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000102 [ 224.739871] RDX: 0000000080000102 RSI: ffffffff820c8c6c RDI: 00000000ffffffff [ 224.739873] RBP: ffff8802644c1540 R08: 0000000071be9b33 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 224.739874] R10: ffff88027dd83dc0 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8802644c1588 [ 224.739876] R13: ffff8802644c1160 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: ffff88026a5dc728 [ 224.739878] FS: 00007f18f4887980(0000) GS:ffff88027dd80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 224.739880] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 224.739881] CR2: 00007f4c627ae548 CR3: 000000022ca1a002 CR4: 00000000003606e0 [ 224.739883] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 224.739885] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 224.739886] Call Trace: [ 224.739888] <IRQ> [ 224.739892] ? qdisc_reset+0xe0/0xe0 [ 224.739894] ? qdisc_reset+0xe0/0xe0 [ 224.739897] call_timer_fn+0x93/0x360 [ 224.739903] expire_timers+0xc1/0x1d0 [ 224.739908] run_timer_softirq+0xc7/0x170 [ 224.739916] __do_softirq+0xd9/0x505 [ 224.739923] irq_exit+0xa9/0xc0 [ 224.739926] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x9c/0x2d0 [ 224.739929] apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20 [ 224.739931] </IRQ> [ 224.739934] RIP: 0010:delay_tsc+0x2e/0xb0 [ 224.739936] Code: 49 89 fc 55 53 bf 01 00 00 00 e8 6d 2c 78 ff e8 88 9d b6 ff 41 89 c5 0f ae e8 0f 31 48 c1 e2 20 48 09 c2 48 89 d5 eb 16 f3 90 <bf> 01 00 00 00 e8 48 2c 78 ff e8 63 9d b6 ff 44 39 e8 75 36 0f ae [ 224.740021] RSP: 0018:ffffc900002f7d48 EFLAGS: 00000286 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffff13 [ 224.740024] RAX: 0000000080000000 RBX: 0000000649565ca9 RCX: 0000000000000001 [ 224.740026] RDX: 0000000080000001 RSI: ffffffff820c8c6c RDI: 00000000ffffffff [ 224.740027] RBP: 00000006493ea9ce R08: 000000005e81e2ee R09: 0000000000000000 [ 224.740029] R10: 0000000000000120 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 00000000002ad8d6 [ 224.740030] R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 0000000000000004 R15: ffff88025caf5408 [ 224.740040] ? delay_tsc+0x66/0xb0 [ 224.740045] hibernation_debug_sleep+0x1c/0x30 [ 224.740048] hibernation_snapshot+0x2c1/0x690 [ 224.740053] hibernate+0x142/0x2a4 [ 224.740057] state_store+0xd0/0xe0 [ 224.740063] kernfs_fop_write+0x104/0x190 [ 224.740068] __vfs_write+0x31/0x180 [ 224.740072] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x6f/0x80 [ 224.740075] ? rcu_sync_lockdep_assert+0x29/0x50 [ 224.740078] ? __sb_start_write+0x152/0x1f0 [ 224.740080] ? __sb_start_write+0x168/0x1f0 [ 224.740084] vfs_write+0xbd/0x1a0 [ 224.740088] ksys_write+0x50/0xc0 [ 224.740094] do_syscall_64+0x55/0x190 [ 224.740097] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 224.740099] RIP: 0033:0x7f18f400a281 [ 224.740100] Code: c3 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 48 8b 05 59 8d 20 00 c3 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 8b 05 8a d1 20 00 85 c0 75 16 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 57 f3 c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 54 55 49 89 d4 53 [ 224.740186] RSP: 002b:00007fffd1f4fec8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 [ 224.740189] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f18f400a281 [ 224.740190] RDX: 0000000000000004 RSI: 00007f18f448069a RDI: 0000000000000006 [ 224.740192] RBP: 00007fffd1f4fef0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 224.740194] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000055e795d03400 [ 224.740195] R13: 00007fffd1f50500 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 224.740205] irq event stamp: 1582591 [ 224.740207] hardirqs last enabled at (1582590): [<ffffffff810f9f9c>] vprintk_emit+0x4bc/0x4d0 [ 224.740210] hardirqs last disabled at (1582591): [<ffffffff81a0111c>] error_entry+0x7c/0x100 [ 224.740212] softirqs last enabled at (1582568): [<ffffffff81c0034f>] __do_softirq+0x34f/0x505 [ 224.740215] softirqs last disabled at (1582571): [<ffffffff8108c959>] irq_exit+0xa9/0xc0 [ 224.740218] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 2982 at net/sched/sch_generic.c:461 dev_watchdog+0x1fd/0x210 [ 224.740219] ---[ end trace 6e41d690e611c338 ]--- References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8037 References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196399 Acked-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@linux.intel.com> Cc: Martin Peres <martin.peres@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170718082110.12524-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@intel.com>
Since the kernel now used hashed pointers for raw addresses, it is very hard to guage the relative placement within a section, and since the hash value will never match up with any contents, using it provides no information relevant for slab debugging. Show the relative offset into each section, so that some reference for the hexdump is provided. References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8038 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
If the MSI is already enabled, trying to enable it again results in an -EINVAL and on the first attempt a WARN. That WARN causes our CI to abort the run [on each first attempt to suspend]: <4> [463.142025] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2225 at drivers/pci/msi.c:1074 __pci_enable_msi_range+0x3cb/0x420 <4> [463.142026] Modules linked in: snd_hda_intel i915 snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic mei_hdcp x86_pkg_temp_thermal coretemp crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul snd_intel_dspcfg ghash_clmulni_intel snd_hda_codec btusb btrtl btbcm btintel e1000e bluetooth snd_hwdep snd_hda_core ptp ecdh_generic snd_pcm ecc pps_core mei_me mei prime_numbers [last unloaded: i915] <4> [463.142045] CPU: 0 PID: 2225 Comm: kworker/u8:14 Tainted: G U 5.7.0-rc2-CI-CI_DRM_8350+ #1 <4> [463.142046] Hardware name: Intel Corporation NUC7i5BNH/NUC7i5BNB, BIOS BNKBL357.86A.0060.2017.1214.2013 12/14/2017 <4> [463.142049] Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn <4> [463.142051] RIP: 0010:__pci_enable_msi_range+0x3cb/0x420 <4> [463.142053] Code: 76 58 49 8d 56 48 48 89 df e8 31 73 fd ff e9 20 fe ff ff 31 f6 48 89 df e8 c2 e9 fd ff e9 d6 fe ff ff 45 89 fc e9 1a ff ff ff <0f> 0b 41 bc ea ff ff ff e9 0d ff ff ff 41 bc ea ff ff ff e9 02 ff <4> [463.142054] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000593cd0 EFLAGS: 00010202 <4> [463.142056] RAX: 0000000000000010 RBX: ffff888274051000 RCX: 0000000000000000 <4> [463.142057] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff888274051000 <4> [463.142058] RBP: ffff888238aa1018 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001 <4> [463.142060] R10: ffffc90000593d90 R11: 00000000c79cdfd5 R12: ffff8882740510b0 <4> [463.142061] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001 <4> [463.142062] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888276c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 <4> [463.142064] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 <4> [463.142065] CR2: 000055706f347d80 CR3: 0000000005610003 CR4: 00000000003606f0 <4> [463.142066] Call Trace: <4> [463.142073] pci_enable_msi+0x11/0x20 <4> [463.142077] azx_resume+0x1ab/0x200 [snd_hda_intel] <4> [463.142080] ? pci_pm_thaw+0x80/0x80 <4> [463.142084] dpm_run_callback+0x64/0x280 <4> [463.142089] device_resume+0xd4/0x1c0 <4> [463.142093] ? dpm_watchdog_set+0x60/0 While this would appear to be a bug in snd-hda, it does appear inconsequential, at least for gfx-ci. Downgrade the warning to an info, like the other already-enabled error for MSI-X. References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8041 Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/1687 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200423082753.3899018-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
We inadvertently create a dependency on mmap_sem with a whole chain. This breaks any user who wants to take a lock and call rcu_barrier(), while also taking that lock inside mmap_sem: <4> [604.892532] ====================================================== <4> [604.892534] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected <4> [604.892536] 5.6.0-rc7-CI-Patchwork_17096+ #1 Tainted: G U <4> [604.892537] ------------------------------------------------------ <4> [604.892538] kms_frontbuffer/2595 is trying to acquire lock: <4> [604.892540] ffffffff8264a558 (rcu_state.barrier_mutex){+.+.}, at: rcu_barrier+0x23/0x190 <4> [604.892547] but task is already holding lock: <4> [604.892547] ffff888484716050 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}, at: i915_gem_object_pin_to_display_plane+0x89/0x270 [i915] <4> [604.892592] which lock already depends on the new lock. <4> [604.892593] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: <4> [604.892594] -> #6 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}: <4> [604.892597] __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.15+0xc3/0x1090 <4> [604.892598] ww_mutex_lock+0x39/0x70 <4> [604.892600] dma_resv_lockdep+0x10e/0x1f5 <4> [604.892602] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x300 <4> [604.892604] kernel_init_freeable+0x17b/0x1dc <4> [604.892605] kernel_init+0x5/0x100 <4> [604.892606] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x50 <4> [604.892607] -> #5 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}: <4> [604.892609] dma_resv_lockdep+0xec/0x1f5 <4> [604.892610] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x300 <4> [604.892610] kernel_init_freeable+0x17b/0x1dc <4> [604.892611] kernel_init+0x5/0x100 <4> [604.892612] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x50 <4> [604.892613] -> #4 (&mm->mmap_sem#2){++++}: <4> [604.892615] __might_fault+0x63/0x90 <4> [604.892617] _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80 <4> [604.892619] perf_read+0x200/0x2b0 <4> [604.892621] vfs_read+0x96/0x160 <4> [604.892622] ksys_read+0x9f/0xe0 <4> [604.892623] do_syscall_64+0x4f/0x220 <4> [604.892624] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe <4> [604.892625] -> #3 (&cpuctx_mutex){+.+.}: <4> [604.892626] __mutex_lock+0x9a/0x9c0 <4> [604.892627] perf_event_init_cpu+0xa4/0x140 <4> [604.892629] perf_event_init+0x19d/0x1cd <4> [604.892630] start_kernel+0x362/0x4e4 <4> [604.892631] secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 <4> [604.892631] -> #2 (pmus_lock){+.+.}: <4> [604.892633] __mutex_lock+0x9a/0x9c0 <4> [604.892633] perf_event_init_cpu+0x6b/0x140 <4> [604.892635] cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x9b/0x9d0 <4> [604.892636] _cpu_up+0xa2/0x140 <4> [604.892637] do_cpu_up+0x61/0xa0 <4> [604.892639] smp_init+0x57/0x96 <4> [604.892639] kernel_init_freeable+0x87/0x1dc <4> [604.892640] kernel_init+0x5/0x100 <4> [604.892642] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x50 <4> [604.892642] -> #1 (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}: <4> [604.892643] cpus_read_lock+0x34/0xd0 <4> [604.892644] rcu_barrier+0xaa/0x190 <4> [604.892645] kernel_init+0x21/0x100 <4> [604.892647] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x50 <4> [604.892647] -> #0 (rcu_state.barrier_mutex){+.+.}: <4> [604.892649] __lock_acquire+0x1328/0x15d0 <4> [604.892650] lock_acquire+0xa7/0x1c0 <4> [604.892651] __mutex_lock+0x9a/0x9c0 <4> [604.892652] rcu_barrier+0x23/0x190 <4> [604.892680] i915_gem_object_unbind+0x29d/0x3f0 [i915] <4> [604.892707] i915_gem_object_pin_to_display_plane+0x141/0x270 [i915] <4> [604.892737] intel_pin_and_fence_fb_obj+0xec/0x1f0 [i915] <4> [604.892767] intel_plane_pin_fb+0x3f/0xd0 [i915] <4> [604.892797] intel_prepare_plane_fb+0x13b/0x5c0 [i915] <4> [604.892798] drm_atomic_helper_prepare_planes+0x85/0x110 <4> [604.892827] intel_atomic_commit+0xda/0x390 [i915] <4> [604.892828] drm_atomic_helper_set_config+0x57/0xa0 <4> [604.892830] drm_mode_setcrtc+0x1c4/0x720 <4> [604.892830] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xb0/0xf0 <4> [604.892831] drm_ioctl+0x2e1/0x390 <4> [604.892833] ksys_ioctl+0x7b/0x90 <4> [604.892835] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x11/0x20 <4> [604.892835] do_syscall_64+0x4f/0x220 <4> [604.892836] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe <4> [604.892837] Changes since v1: - Use (*values)[n++] in perf_read_one(). Changes since v2: - Centrally allocate values. References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8042 Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200502171413.9133-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8043 Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Audio component in i915 is not hooked up yet causing long timeouts and angry abortive CI. References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8045 Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8046 Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2805 Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8047 Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2874 Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@intel.com>
By allowing the filter_glob parameter to be written to, it's possible to tweak the testsuites that will be executed on new module loads. This makes it easier to run specific tests without having to reload kunit and provides a way to filter tests on real HW even if kunit is builtin. Example for xe driver: 1) Run just 1 test # echo -n xe_bo > /sys/module/kunit/parameters/filter_glob # modprobe -r xe_live_test # modprobe xe_live_test # ls /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/ xe_bo 2) Run all tests # echo \* > /sys/module/kunit/parameters/filter_glob # modprobe -r xe_live_test # modprobe xe_live_test # ls /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/ xe_bo xe_dma_buf xe_migrate xe_mocs For completeness and to cover other use cases, also change filter and filter_action to rw. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/intel-xe/dzacvbdditbneiu3e3fmstjmttcbne44yspumpkd6sjn56jqpk@vxu7sksbqrp6/ Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> [ This commit is targeting 6.9 through the kunit tree. Add to topic/core-for-CI so our CI infrastructure can start using it ahead of that ] References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/10157 Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
# Conflicts: # drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
--- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: requests dependency-type: direct:production ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
rodrigovivi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 12, 2024
Chi Zhiling reported:
We found a null pointer accessing in tracefs[1], the reason is that the
variable 'ei_child' is set to LIST_POISON1, that means the list was
removed in eventfs_remove_rec. so when access the ei_child->is_freed, the
panic triggered.
by the way, the following script can reproduce this panic
loop1 (){
while true
do
echo "p:kp submit_bio" > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events
echo "" > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events
done
}
loop2 (){
while true
do
tree /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kprobes/
done
}
loop1 &
loop2
[1]:
[ 1147.959632][T17331] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address dead000000000150
[ 1147.968239][T17331] Mem abort info:
[ 1147.971739][T17331] ESR = 0x0000000096000004
[ 1147.976172][T17331] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
[ 1147.982171][T17331] SET = 0, FnV = 0
[ 1147.985906][T17331] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
[ 1147.989734][T17331] FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault
[ 1147.995292][T17331] Data abort info:
[ 1147.998858][T17331] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004, ISS2 = 0x00000000
[ 1148.005023][T17331] CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0
[ 1148.010759][T17331] GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0
[ 1148.016752][T17331] [dead000000000150] address between user and kernel address ranges
[ 1148.024571][T17331] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] SMP
[ 1148.030825][T17331] Modules linked in: team_mode_loadbalance team nlmon act_gact cls_flower sch_ingress bonding tls macvlan dummy ib_core bridge stp llc veth amdgpu amdxcp mfd_core gpu_sched drm_exec drm_buddy radeon crct10dif_ce video drm_suballoc_helper ghash_ce drm_ttm_helper sha2_ce ttm sha256_arm64 i2c_algo_bit sha1_ce sbsa_gwdt cp210x drm_display_helper cec sr_mod cdrom drm_kms_helper binfmt_misc sg loop fuse drm dm_mod nfnetlink ip_tables autofs4 [last unloaded: tls]
[ 1148.072808][T17331] CPU: 3 PID: 17331 Comm: ls Tainted: G W ------- ---- 6.6.43 #2
[ 1148.081751][T17331] Source Version: 21b3b386e948bedd29369af66f3e98ab01b1c650
[ 1148.088783][T17331] Hardware name: Greatwall GW-001M1A-FTF/GW-001M1A-FTF, BIOS KunLun BIOS V4.0 07/16/2020
[ 1148.098419][T17331] pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[ 1148.106060][T17331] pc : eventfs_iterate+0x2c0/0x398
[ 1148.111017][T17331] lr : eventfs_iterate+0x2fc/0x398
[ 1148.115969][T17331] sp : ffff80008d56bbd0
[ 1148.119964][T17331] x29: ffff80008d56bbf0 x28: ffff001ff5be2600 x27: 0000000000000000
[ 1148.127781][T17331] x26: ffff001ff52ca4e0 x25: 0000000000009977 x24: dead000000000100
[ 1148.135598][T17331] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 000000000000000b x21: ffff800082645f10
[ 1148.143415][T17331] x20: ffff001fddf87c70 x19: ffff80008d56bc90 x18: 0000000000000000
[ 1148.151231][T17331] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: ffff001ff52ca4e0
[ 1148.159048][T17331] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000
[ 1148.166864][T17331] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000000 x9 : ffff8000804391d0
[ 1148.174680][T17331] x8 : 0000000180000000 x7 : 0000000000000018 x6 : 0000aaab04b92862
[ 1148.182498][T17331] x5 : 0000aaab04b92862 x4 : 0000000080000000 x3 : 0000000000000068
[ 1148.190314][T17331] x2 : 000000000000000f x1 : 0000000000007ea8 x0 : 0000000000000001
[ 1148.198131][T17331] Call trace:
[ 1148.201259][T17331] eventfs_iterate+0x2c0/0x398
[ 1148.205864][T17331] iterate_dir+0x98/0x188
[ 1148.210036][T17331] __arm64_sys_getdents64+0x78/0x160
[ 1148.215161][T17331] invoke_syscall+0x78/0x108
[ 1148.219593][T17331] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x48/0xf0
[ 1148.224977][T17331] do_el0_svc+0x24/0x38
[ 1148.228974][T17331] el0_svc+0x40/0x168
[ 1148.232798][T17331] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x120/0x130
[ 1148.237836][T17331] el0t_64_sync+0x1a4/0x1a8
[ 1148.242182][T17331] Code: 54ffff6c f9400676 910006d6 f9000676 (b9405300)
[ 1148.248955][T17331] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
The issue is that list_del() is used on an SRCU protected list variable
before the synchronization occurs. This can poison the list pointers while
there is a reader iterating the list.
This is simply fixed by using list_del_rcu() that is specifically made for
this purpose.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20240829085025.3600021-1-chizhiling@163.com/
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20240904131605.640d42b1@gandalf.local.home
Fixes: 43aa6f9 ("eventfs: Get rid of dentry pointers without refcounts")
Reported-by: Chi Zhiling <chizhiling@kylinos.cn>
Tested-by: Chi Zhiling <chizhiling@kylinos.cn>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
rodrigovivi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 12, 2024
…nux/kernel/git/ukleinek/linux Pull pwm fix from Uwe Kleine-König: "Fix an off-by-one in the stm32 driver. Hardware engineers tend to start counting at 1 while the software guys usually start with 0. This isn't so nice because that results in drivers where pwm device #2 needs to use the hardware registers with index 3. This was noticed by Fabrice Gasnier. A small patch fixing that mismatch is the only change included here" * tag 'pwm/for-6.11-rc7-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ukleinek/linux: pwm: stm32: Use the right CCxNP bit in stm32_pwm_enable()
rodrigovivi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 12, 2024
Remove intel_dp_mst_suspend/resume from runtime suspend resume
sequences. It is incorrect as it depends on AUX transfers which
itself depend on the device being runtime resumed. This is
also why we see a lock_dep splat here.
<4> [76.011119] kworker/4:2/192 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [76.011122] ffff8881120b3210 (&mgr->lock#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_suspend+0x33/0xd0 [drm_display_helper]
<4> [76.011142]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [76.011144] ffffffffa0bc3420
(xe_pm_runtime_lockdep_map){+.+.}-{0:0}, at:
xe_pm_runtime_suspend+0x51/0x3f0 [xe]
<4> [76.011223]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
<4> [76.011226]
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
<4> [76.011229]
-> #2 (xe_pm_runtime_lockdep_map){+.+.}-{0:0}:
<4> [76.011233] pm_runtime_lockdep_prime+0x2f/0x50 [xe]
<4> [76.011306] xe_pm_runtime_resume_and_get+0x29/0x90 [xe]
<4> [76.011377] intel_display_power_get+0x24/0x70 [xe]
<4> [76.011466] intel_digital_port_connected_locked+0x4c/0xf0
[xe]
<4> [76.011551] intel_dp_aux_xfer+0xb8/0x7c0 [xe]
<4> [76.011633] intel_dp_aux_transfer+0x166/0x2e0 [xe]
<4> [76.011715] drm_dp_dpcd_access+0x87/0x150
[drm_display_helper]
<4> [76.011726] drm_dp_dpcd_probe+0x3d/0xf0 [drm_display_helper]
<4> [76.011737] drm_dp_dpcd_read+0xdd/0x130 [drm_display_helper]
<4> [76.011747] intel_dp_get_colorimetry_status+0x3a/0x70 [xe]
<4> [76.011886] intel_dp_init_connector+0x4ff/0x1030 [xe]
<4> [76.011969] intel_ddi_init+0xc5b/0x1030 [xe]
<4> [76.012058] intel_bios_for_each_encoder+0x36/0x60 [xe]
<4> [76.012145] intel_setup_outputs+0x201/0x460 [xe]
<4> [76.012233] intel_display_driver_probe_nogem+0x155/0x1e0 [xe]
<4> [76.012320] xe_display_init_noaccel+0x27/0x70 [xe]
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240912012545.702032-2-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
rodrigovivi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 12, 2024
Do not do intel_fbdev_set_suspend during runtime_suspend/resume
functions. This cause a big circular lock_dep splat.
kworker/0:4/198 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [77.185594] ffffffff83398500 (console_lock){+.+.}-{0:0}, at:
intel_fbdev_set_suspend+0x169/0x1f0 [xe]
<4> [77.185947]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [77.185949] ffffffffa09e9460
(xe_pm_runtime_lockdep_map){+.+.}-{0:0}, at:
xe_pm_runtime_suspend+0x51/0x3f0 [xe]
<4> [77.186262]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
<4> [77.186264]
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
<4> [77.186266]
-> #2 (xe_pm_runtime_lockdep_map){+.+.}-{0:0}:
<4> [77.186276] pm_runtime_lockdep_prime+0x2f/0x50 [xe]
<4> [77.186572] xe_pm_runtime_resume_and_get+0x29/0x90 [xe]
<4> [77.186867] intelfb_create+0x150/0x390 [xe]
<4> [77.187197]
__drm_fb_helper_initial_config_and_unlock+0x31c/0x5e0 [drm_kms_helper]
<4> [77.187243] drm_fb_helper_initial_config+0x3d/0x50
[drm_kms_helper]
<4> [77.187274] intel_fbdev_client_hotplug+0xb1/0x140 [xe]
<4> [77.187603] drm_client_register+0x87/0xd0 [drm]
<4> [77.187704] intel_fbdev_setup+0x51c/0x640 [xe]
<4> [77.188033] intel_display_driver_register+0xb7/0xf0 [xe]
<4> [77.188438] xe_display_register+0x21/0x40 [xe]
<4> [77.188809] xe_device_probe+0xa8d/0xbf0 [xe]
<4> [77.189035] xe_pci_probe+0x333/0x5b0 [xe]
<4> [77.189330] local_pci_probe+0x48/0xb0
<4> [77.189341] pci_device_probe+0xc8/0x280
<4> [77.189351] really_probe+0xf8/0x390
<4> [77.189362] __driver_probe_device+0x8a/0x170
<4> [77.189373] driver_probe_device+0x23/0xb0
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240912012545.702032-3-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
rodrigovivi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 18, 2024
…git/netfilter/nf Pablo Neira Ayuso says: ==================== Netfilter fixes for net The following batch contains two fixes from Florian Westphal: Patch #1 fixes a sk refcount leak in nft_socket on mismatch. Patch #2 fixes cgroupsv2 matching from containers due to incorrect level in subtree. netfilter pull request 24-09-12 * tag 'nf-24-09-12' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netfilter/nf: netfilter: nft_socket: make cgroupsv2 matching work with namespaces netfilter: nft_socket: fix sk refcount leaks ==================== Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240911222520.3606-1-pablo@netfilter.org Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
rodrigovivi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 18, 2024
We inadvertently create a dependency on mmap_sem with a whole chain. This breaks any user who wants to take a lock and call rcu_barrier(), while also taking that lock inside mmap_sem: <4> [604.892532] ====================================================== <4> [604.892534] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected <4> [604.892536] 5.6.0-rc7-CI-Patchwork_17096+ #1 Tainted: G U <4> [604.892537] ------------------------------------------------------ <4> [604.892538] kms_frontbuffer/2595 is trying to acquire lock: <4> [604.892540] ffffffff8264a558 (rcu_state.barrier_mutex){+.+.}, at: rcu_barrier+0x23/0x190 <4> [604.892547] but task is already holding lock: <4> [604.892547] ffff888484716050 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}, at: i915_gem_object_pin_to_display_plane+0x89/0x270 [i915] <4> [604.892592] which lock already depends on the new lock. <4> [604.892593] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: <4> [604.892594] -> #6 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}: <4> [604.892597] __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.15+0xc3/0x1090 <4> [604.892598] ww_mutex_lock+0x39/0x70 <4> [604.892600] dma_resv_lockdep+0x10e/0x1f5 <4> [604.892602] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x300 <4> [604.892604] kernel_init_freeable+0x17b/0x1dc <4> [604.892605] kernel_init+0x5/0x100 <4> [604.892606] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x50 <4> [604.892607] -> #5 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}: <4> [604.892609] dma_resv_lockdep+0xec/0x1f5 <4> [604.892610] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x300 <4> [604.892610] kernel_init_freeable+0x17b/0x1dc <4> [604.892611] kernel_init+0x5/0x100 <4> [604.892612] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x50 <4> [604.892613] -> #4 (&mm->mmap_sem#2){++++}: <4> [604.892615] __might_fault+0x63/0x90 <4> [604.892617] _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80 <4> [604.892619] perf_read+0x200/0x2b0 <4> [604.892621] vfs_read+0x96/0x160 <4> [604.892622] ksys_read+0x9f/0xe0 <4> [604.892623] do_syscall_64+0x4f/0x220 <4> [604.892624] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe <4> [604.892625] -> #3 (&cpuctx_mutex){+.+.}: <4> [604.892626] __mutex_lock+0x9a/0x9c0 <4> [604.892627] perf_event_init_cpu+0xa4/0x140 <4> [604.892629] perf_event_init+0x19d/0x1cd <4> [604.892630] start_kernel+0x362/0x4e4 <4> [604.892631] secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 <4> [604.892631] -> #2 (pmus_lock){+.+.}: <4> [604.892633] __mutex_lock+0x9a/0x9c0 <4> [604.892633] perf_event_init_cpu+0x6b/0x140 <4> [604.892635] cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x9b/0x9d0 <4> [604.892636] _cpu_up+0xa2/0x140 <4> [604.892637] do_cpu_up+0x61/0xa0 <4> [604.892639] smp_init+0x57/0x96 <4> [604.892639] kernel_init_freeable+0x87/0x1dc <4> [604.892640] kernel_init+0x5/0x100 <4> [604.892642] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x50 <4> [604.892642] -> #1 (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}: <4> [604.892643] cpus_read_lock+0x34/0xd0 <4> [604.892644] rcu_barrier+0xaa/0x190 <4> [604.892645] kernel_init+0x21/0x100 <4> [604.892647] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x50 <4> [604.892647] -> #0 (rcu_state.barrier_mutex){+.+.}: <4> [604.892649] __lock_acquire+0x1328/0x15d0 <4> [604.892650] lock_acquire+0xa7/0x1c0 <4> [604.892651] __mutex_lock+0x9a/0x9c0 <4> [604.892652] rcu_barrier+0x23/0x190 <4> [604.892680] i915_gem_object_unbind+0x29d/0x3f0 [i915] <4> [604.892707] i915_gem_object_pin_to_display_plane+0x141/0x270 [i915] <4> [604.892737] intel_pin_and_fence_fb_obj+0xec/0x1f0 [i915] <4> [604.892767] intel_plane_pin_fb+0x3f/0xd0 [i915] <4> [604.892797] intel_prepare_plane_fb+0x13b/0x5c0 [i915] <4> [604.892798] drm_atomic_helper_prepare_planes+0x85/0x110 <4> [604.892827] intel_atomic_commit+0xda/0x390 [i915] <4> [604.892828] drm_atomic_helper_set_config+0x57/0xa0 <4> [604.892830] drm_mode_setcrtc+0x1c4/0x720 <4> [604.892830] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xb0/0xf0 <4> [604.892831] drm_ioctl+0x2e1/0x390 <4> [604.892833] ksys_ioctl+0x7b/0x90 <4> [604.892835] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x11/0x20 <4> [604.892835] do_syscall_64+0x4f/0x220 <4> [604.892836] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe <4> [604.892837] Changes since v1: - Use (*values)[n++] in perf_read_one(). Changes since v2: - Centrally allocate values. References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8042 Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200502171413.9133-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
rodrigovivi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 27, 2025
irq_chip functions may be called in raw spinlock context. Therefore, we
must also use a raw spinlock for our own internal locking.
This fixes the following lockdep splat:
[ 5.349336] =============================
[ 5.353349] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
[ 5.357361] 6.13.0-rc5+ #69 Tainted: G W
[ 5.363031] -----------------------------
[ 5.367045] kworker/u17:1/44 is trying to lock:
[ 5.371587] ffffff88018b02c0 (&chip->gpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: xgpio_irq_unmask (drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c:433 (discriminator 8))
[ 5.380079] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 5.385138] context-{5:5}
[ 5.387762] 5 locks held by kworker/u17:1/44:
[ 5.392123] #0: ffffff8800014958 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3204)
[ 5.402260] #1: ffffffc082fcbdd8 (deferred_probe_work){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3205)
[ 5.411528] #2: ffffff880172c900 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_attach (drivers/base/dd.c:1006)
[ 5.419929] #3: ffffff88039c8268 (request_class#2){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __setup_irq (kernel/irq/internals.h:156 kernel/irq/manage.c:1596)
[ 5.428331] #4: ffffff88039c80c8 (lock_class#2){....}-{2:2}, at: __setup_irq (kernel/irq/manage.c:1614)
[ 5.436472] stack backtrace:
[ 5.439359] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 44 Comm: kworker/u17:1 Tainted: G W 6.13.0-rc5+ #69
[ 5.448690] Tainted: [W]=WARN
[ 5.451656] Hardware name: xlnx,zynqmp (DT)
[ 5.455845] Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func
[ 5.461699] Call trace:
[ 5.464147] show_stack+0x18/0x24 C
[ 5.467821] dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:123)
[ 5.471501] dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:130)
[ 5.474824] __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4828 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4898 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5176)
[ 5.478758] lock_acquire (arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h:40 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:467 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5851 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5814)
[ 5.482429] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave (include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:111 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162)
[ 5.486797] xgpio_irq_unmask (drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c:433 (discriminator 8))
[ 5.490737] irq_enable (kernel/irq/internals.h:236 kernel/irq/chip.c:170 kernel/irq/chip.c:439 kernel/irq/chip.c:432 kernel/irq/chip.c:345)
[ 5.494060] __irq_startup (kernel/irq/internals.h:241 kernel/irq/chip.c:180 kernel/irq/chip.c:250)
[ 5.497645] irq_startup (kernel/irq/chip.c:270)
[ 5.501143] __setup_irq (kernel/irq/manage.c:1807)
[ 5.504728] request_threaded_irq (kernel/irq/manage.c:2208)
Fixes: a32c7ca ("gpio: gpio-xilinx: Add interrupt support")
Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@linux.dev>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250110163354.2012654-1-sean.anderson@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
rodrigovivi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 27, 2025
This commit addresses a circular locking dependency issue within the GFX
isolation mechanism. The problem was identified by a warning indicating
a potential deadlock due to inconsistent lock acquisition order.
- The `amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use` and
`amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_end_use` functions previously
acquired `enforce_isolation_mutex` and called `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl`,
leading to potential deadlocks. ie., If `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl` is
called while `enforce_isolation_mutex` is held, and
`amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_handler` is called while `kfd_sch_mutex` is
held, it can create a circular dependency.
By ensuring consistent lock usage, this fix resolves the issue:
[ 606.297333] ======================================================
[ 606.297343] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 606.297353] 6.10.0-amd-mlkd-610-311224-lof #19 Tainted: G OE
[ 606.297365] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 606.297375] kworker/u96:3/3825 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 606.297385] ffff9aa64e431cb8 ((work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x232/0x610
[ 606.297413]
but task is already holding lock:
[ 606.297423] ffff9aa64e432338 (&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x51/0x4d0 [amdgpu]
[ 606.297725]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 606.297738]
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 606.297749]
-> #2 (&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[ 606.297765] __mutex_lock+0x85/0x930
[ 606.297776] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30
[ 606.297786] amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x51/0x4d0 [amdgpu]
[ 606.298007] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x2a4/0x5d0 [amdgpu]
[ 606.298225] amdgpu_ring_alloc+0x48/0x70 [amdgpu]
[ 606.298412] amdgpu_ib_schedule+0x176/0x8a0 [amdgpu]
[ 606.298603] amdgpu_job_run+0xac/0x1e0 [amdgpu]
[ 606.298866] drm_sched_run_job_work+0x24f/0x430 [gpu_sched]
[ 606.298880] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680
[ 606.298890] worker_thread+0x190/0x350
[ 606.298899] kthread+0xe7/0x120
[ 606.298908] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60
[ 606.298919] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
[ 606.298929]
-> #1 (&adev->enforce_isolation_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[ 606.298947] __mutex_lock+0x85/0x930
[ 606.298956] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30
[ 606.298966] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_handler+0x87/0x370 [amdgpu]
[ 606.299190] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680
[ 606.299199] worker_thread+0x190/0x350
[ 606.299208] kthread+0xe7/0x120
[ 606.299217] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60
[ 606.299227] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
[ 606.299236]
-> #0 ((work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
[ 606.299257] __lock_acquire+0x16f9/0x2810
[ 606.299267] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300
[ 606.299276] __flush_work+0x250/0x610
[ 606.299286] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x71/0x80
[ 606.299296] amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x287/0x4d0 [amdgpu]
[ 606.299509] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x2a4/0x5d0 [amdgpu]
[ 606.299723] amdgpu_ring_alloc+0x48/0x70 [amdgpu]
[ 606.299909] amdgpu_ib_schedule+0x176/0x8a0 [amdgpu]
[ 606.300101] amdgpu_job_run+0xac/0x1e0 [amdgpu]
[ 606.300355] drm_sched_run_job_work+0x24f/0x430 [gpu_sched]
[ 606.300369] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680
[ 606.300378] worker_thread+0x190/0x350
[ 606.300387] kthread+0xe7/0x120
[ 606.300396] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60
[ 606.300406] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
[ 606.300416]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 606.300428] Chain exists of:
(work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work) --> &adev->enforce_isolation_mutex --> &adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex
[ 606.300458] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 606.300468] CPU0 CPU1
[ 606.300476] ---- ----
[ 606.300484] lock(&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex);
[ 606.300494] lock(&adev->enforce_isolation_mutex);
[ 606.300508] lock(&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex);
[ 606.300521] lock((work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work));
[ 606.300536]
*** DEADLOCK ***
[ 606.300546] 5 locks held by kworker/u96:3/3825:
[ 606.300555] #0: ffff9aa5aa1f5d58 ((wq_completion)comp_1.1.0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x3f5/0x680
[ 606.300577] #1: ffffaa53c3c97e40 ((work_completion)(&sched->work_run_job)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1d6/0x680
[ 606.300600] #2: ffff9aa64e463c98 (&adev->enforce_isolation_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x1c3/0x5d0 [amdgpu]
[ 606.300837] #3: ffff9aa64e432338 (&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x51/0x4d0 [amdgpu]
[ 606.301062] #4: ffffffff8c1a5660 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __flush_work+0x70/0x610
[ 606.301083]
stack backtrace:
[ 606.301092] CPU: 14 PID: 3825 Comm: kworker/u96:3 Tainted: G OE 6.10.0-amd-mlkd-610-311224-lof #19
[ 606.301109] Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. X570S GAMING X/X570S GAMING X, BIOS F7 03/22/2024
[ 606.301124] Workqueue: comp_1.1.0 drm_sched_run_job_work [gpu_sched]
[ 606.301140] Call Trace:
[ 606.301146] <TASK>
[ 606.301154] dump_stack_lvl+0x9b/0xf0
[ 606.301166] dump_stack+0x10/0x20
[ 606.301175] print_circular_bug+0x26c/0x340
[ 606.301187] check_noncircular+0x157/0x170
[ 606.301197] ? register_lock_class+0x48/0x490
[ 606.301213] __lock_acquire+0x16f9/0x2810
[ 606.301230] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300
[ 606.301239] ? __flush_work+0x232/0x610
[ 606.301250] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[ 606.301261] ? mark_held_locks+0x54/0x90
[ 606.301274] ? __flush_work+0x232/0x610
[ 606.301284] __flush_work+0x250/0x610
[ 606.301293] ? __flush_work+0x232/0x610
[ 606.301305] ? __pfx_wq_barrier_func+0x10/0x10
[ 606.301318] ? mark_held_locks+0x54/0x90
[ 606.301331] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[ 606.301345] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x71/0x80
[ 606.301356] amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x287/0x4d0 [amdgpu]
[ 606.301661] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x2a4/0x5d0 [amdgpu]
[ 606.302050] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[ 606.302069] amdgpu_ring_alloc+0x48/0x70 [amdgpu]
[ 606.302452] amdgpu_ib_schedule+0x176/0x8a0 [amdgpu]
[ 606.302862] ? drm_sched_entity_error+0x82/0x190 [gpu_sched]
[ 606.302890] amdgpu_job_run+0xac/0x1e0 [amdgpu]
[ 606.303366] drm_sched_run_job_work+0x24f/0x430 [gpu_sched]
[ 606.303388] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680
[ 606.303409] worker_thread+0x190/0x350
[ 606.303424] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
[ 606.303437] kthread+0xe7/0x120
[ 606.303449] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[ 606.303463] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60
[ 606.303476] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[ 606.303489] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
[ 606.303512] </TASK>
v2: Refactor lock handling to resolve circular dependency (Alex)
- Introduced a `sched_work` flag to defer the call to
`amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl` until after releasing
`enforce_isolation_mutex`.
- This change ensures that `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl` is called outside
the critical section, preventing the circular dependency and deadlock.
- The `sched_work` flag is set within the mutex-protected section if
conditions are met, and the actual function call is made afterward.
- This approach ensures consistent lock acquisition order.
Fixes: afefd6f ("drm/amdgpu: Implement Enforce Isolation Handler for KGD/KFD serialization")
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Srinivasan Shanmugam <srinivasan.shanmugam@amd.com>
Suggested-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
rodrigovivi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 27, 2025
This commit addresses a circular locking dependency issue within the GFX
isolation mechanism. The problem was identified by a warning indicating
a potential deadlock due to inconsistent lock acquisition order.
- The `amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use` and
`amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_end_use` functions previously
acquired `enforce_isolation_mutex` and called `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl`,
leading to potential deadlocks. ie., If `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl` is
called while `enforce_isolation_mutex` is held, and
`amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_handler` is called while `kfd_sch_mutex` is
held, it can create a circular dependency.
By ensuring consistent lock usage, this fix resolves the issue:
[ 606.297333] ======================================================
[ 606.297343] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 606.297353] 6.10.0-amd-mlkd-610-311224-lof #19 Tainted: G OE
[ 606.297365] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 606.297375] kworker/u96:3/3825 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 606.297385] ffff9aa64e431cb8 ((work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x232/0x610
[ 606.297413]
but task is already holding lock:
[ 606.297423] ffff9aa64e432338 (&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x51/0x4d0 [amdgpu]
[ 606.297725]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 606.297738]
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 606.297749]
-> #2 (&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[ 606.297765] __mutex_lock+0x85/0x930
[ 606.297776] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30
[ 606.297786] amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x51/0x4d0 [amdgpu]
[ 606.298007] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x2a4/0x5d0 [amdgpu]
[ 606.298225] amdgpu_ring_alloc+0x48/0x70 [amdgpu]
[ 606.298412] amdgpu_ib_schedule+0x176/0x8a0 [amdgpu]
[ 606.298603] amdgpu_job_run+0xac/0x1e0 [amdgpu]
[ 606.298866] drm_sched_run_job_work+0x24f/0x430 [gpu_sched]
[ 606.298880] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680
[ 606.298890] worker_thread+0x190/0x350
[ 606.298899] kthread+0xe7/0x120
[ 606.298908] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60
[ 606.298919] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
[ 606.298929]
-> #1 (&adev->enforce_isolation_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[ 606.298947] __mutex_lock+0x85/0x930
[ 606.298956] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30
[ 606.298966] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_handler+0x87/0x370 [amdgpu]
[ 606.299190] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680
[ 606.299199] worker_thread+0x190/0x350
[ 606.299208] kthread+0xe7/0x120
[ 606.299217] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60
[ 606.299227] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
[ 606.299236]
-> #0 ((work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
[ 606.299257] __lock_acquire+0x16f9/0x2810
[ 606.299267] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300
[ 606.299276] __flush_work+0x250/0x610
[ 606.299286] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x71/0x80
[ 606.299296] amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x287/0x4d0 [amdgpu]
[ 606.299509] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x2a4/0x5d0 [amdgpu]
[ 606.299723] amdgpu_ring_alloc+0x48/0x70 [amdgpu]
[ 606.299909] amdgpu_ib_schedule+0x176/0x8a0 [amdgpu]
[ 606.300101] amdgpu_job_run+0xac/0x1e0 [amdgpu]
[ 606.300355] drm_sched_run_job_work+0x24f/0x430 [gpu_sched]
[ 606.300369] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680
[ 606.300378] worker_thread+0x190/0x350
[ 606.300387] kthread+0xe7/0x120
[ 606.300396] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60
[ 606.300406] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
[ 606.300416]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 606.300428] Chain exists of:
(work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work) --> &adev->enforce_isolation_mutex --> &adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex
[ 606.300458] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 606.300468] CPU0 CPU1
[ 606.300476] ---- ----
[ 606.300484] lock(&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex);
[ 606.300494] lock(&adev->enforce_isolation_mutex);
[ 606.300508] lock(&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex);
[ 606.300521] lock((work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work));
[ 606.300536]
*** DEADLOCK ***
[ 606.300546] 5 locks held by kworker/u96:3/3825:
[ 606.300555] #0: ffff9aa5aa1f5d58 ((wq_completion)comp_1.1.0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x3f5/0x680
[ 606.300577] #1: ffffaa53c3c97e40 ((work_completion)(&sched->work_run_job)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1d6/0x680
[ 606.300600] #2: ffff9aa64e463c98 (&adev->enforce_isolation_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x1c3/0x5d0 [amdgpu]
[ 606.300837] #3: ffff9aa64e432338 (&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x51/0x4d0 [amdgpu]
[ 606.301062] #4: ffffffff8c1a5660 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __flush_work+0x70/0x610
[ 606.301083]
stack backtrace:
[ 606.301092] CPU: 14 PID: 3825 Comm: kworker/u96:3 Tainted: G OE 6.10.0-amd-mlkd-610-311224-lof #19
[ 606.301109] Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. X570S GAMING X/X570S GAMING X, BIOS F7 03/22/2024
[ 606.301124] Workqueue: comp_1.1.0 drm_sched_run_job_work [gpu_sched]
[ 606.301140] Call Trace:
[ 606.301146] <TASK>
[ 606.301154] dump_stack_lvl+0x9b/0xf0
[ 606.301166] dump_stack+0x10/0x20
[ 606.301175] print_circular_bug+0x26c/0x340
[ 606.301187] check_noncircular+0x157/0x170
[ 606.301197] ? register_lock_class+0x48/0x490
[ 606.301213] __lock_acquire+0x16f9/0x2810
[ 606.301230] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300
[ 606.301239] ? __flush_work+0x232/0x610
[ 606.301250] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[ 606.301261] ? mark_held_locks+0x54/0x90
[ 606.301274] ? __flush_work+0x232/0x610
[ 606.301284] __flush_work+0x250/0x610
[ 606.301293] ? __flush_work+0x232/0x610
[ 606.301305] ? __pfx_wq_barrier_func+0x10/0x10
[ 606.301318] ? mark_held_locks+0x54/0x90
[ 606.301331] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[ 606.301345] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x71/0x80
[ 606.301356] amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x287/0x4d0 [amdgpu]
[ 606.301661] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x2a4/0x5d0 [amdgpu]
[ 606.302050] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[ 606.302069] amdgpu_ring_alloc+0x48/0x70 [amdgpu]
[ 606.302452] amdgpu_ib_schedule+0x176/0x8a0 [amdgpu]
[ 606.302862] ? drm_sched_entity_error+0x82/0x190 [gpu_sched]
[ 606.302890] amdgpu_job_run+0xac/0x1e0 [amdgpu]
[ 606.303366] drm_sched_run_job_work+0x24f/0x430 [gpu_sched]
[ 606.303388] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680
[ 606.303409] worker_thread+0x190/0x350
[ 606.303424] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
[ 606.303437] kthread+0xe7/0x120
[ 606.303449] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[ 606.303463] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60
[ 606.303476] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[ 606.303489] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
[ 606.303512] </TASK>
v2: Refactor lock handling to resolve circular dependency (Alex)
- Introduced a `sched_work` flag to defer the call to
`amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl` until after releasing
`enforce_isolation_mutex`.
- This change ensures that `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl` is called outside
the critical section, preventing the circular dependency and deadlock.
- The `sched_work` flag is set within the mutex-protected section if
conditions are met, and the actual function call is made afterward.
- This approach ensures consistent lock acquisition order.
Fixes: afefd6f ("drm/amdgpu: Implement Enforce Isolation Handler for KGD/KFD serialization")
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Srinivasan Shanmugam <srinivasan.shanmugam@amd.com>
Suggested-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
(cherry picked from commit 0b6b2dd)
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
rodrigovivi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 27, 2025
syz reports an out of bounds read: ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ocfs2_match fs/ocfs2/dir.c:334 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ocfs2_search_dirblock+0x283/0x6e0 fs/ocfs2/dir.c:367 Read of size 1 at addr ffff88804d8b9982 by task syz-executor.2/14802 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 14802 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc4 #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Sched_ext: serialise (enabled+all), task: runnable_at=-10ms Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x229/0x350 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:378 [inline] print_report+0x164/0x530 mm/kasan/report.c:489 kasan_report+0x147/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:602 ocfs2_match fs/ocfs2/dir.c:334 [inline] ocfs2_search_dirblock+0x283/0x6e0 fs/ocfs2/dir.c:367 ocfs2_find_entry_id fs/ocfs2/dir.c:414 [inline] ocfs2_find_entry+0x1143/0x2db0 fs/ocfs2/dir.c:1078 ocfs2_find_files_on_disk+0x18e/0x530 fs/ocfs2/dir.c:1981 ocfs2_lookup_ino_from_name+0xb6/0x110 fs/ocfs2/dir.c:2003 ocfs2_lookup+0x30a/0xd40 fs/ocfs2/namei.c:122 lookup_open fs/namei.c:3627 [inline] open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3748 [inline] path_openat+0x145a/0x3870 fs/namei.c:3984 do_filp_open+0xe9/0x1c0 fs/namei.c:4014 do_sys_openat2+0x135/0x1d0 fs/open.c:1402 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1417 [inline] __do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1433 [inline] __se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1428 [inline] __x64_sys_openat+0x15d/0x1c0 fs/open.c:1428 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf6/0x210 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f01076903ad Code: c3 e8 a7 2b 00 00 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007f01084acfc8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000101 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f01077cbf80 RCX: 00007f01076903ad RDX: 0000000000105042 RSI: 0000000020000080 RDI: ffffffffffffff9c RBP: 00007f01077cbf80 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 00000000000001ff R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007f01077cbf80 R14: 00007f010764fc90 R15: 00007f010848d000 </TASK> ================================================================== And a general protection fault in ocfs2_prepare_dir_for_insert: ================================================================== loop0: detected capacity change from 0 to 32768 JBD2: Ignoring recovery information on journal ocfs2: Mounting device (7,0) on (node local, slot 0) with ordered data mode. Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000001: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000008-0x000000000000000f] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5096 Comm: syz-executor792 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc4-syzkaller-00002-gb0da640826ba #0 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:ocfs2_find_dir_space_id fs/ocfs2/dir.c:3406 [inline] RIP: 0010:ocfs2_prepare_dir_for_insert+0x3309/0x5c70 fs/ocfs2/dir.c:4280 Code: 00 00 e8 2a 25 13 fe e9 ba 06 00 00 e8 20 25 13 fe e9 4f 01 00 00 e8 16 25 13 fe 49 8d 7f 08 49 8d 5f 09 48 89 f8 48 c1 e8 03 <42> 0f b6 04 20 84 c0 0f 85 bd 23 00 00 48 89 d8 48 c1 e8 03 42 0f RSP: 0018:ffffc9000af9f020 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000009 RCX: ffff88801e27a440 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000400 RDI: 0000000000000008 RBP: ffffc9000af9f830 R08: ffffffff8380395b R09: ffffffff838090a7 R10: 0000000000000002 R11: ffff88801e27a440 R12: dffffc0000000000 R13: ffff88803c660878 R14: f700000000000088 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 000055555a677380(0000) GS:ffff888020800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000560bce569178 CR3: 000000001de5a000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> ocfs2_mknod+0xcaf/0x2b40 fs/ocfs2/namei.c:292 vfs_mknod+0x36d/0x3b0 fs/namei.c:4088 do_mknodat+0x3ec/0x5b0 __do_sys_mknodat fs/namei.c:4166 [inline] __se_sys_mknodat fs/namei.c:4163 [inline] __x64_sys_mknodat+0xa7/0xc0 fs/namei.c:4163 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f2dafda3a99 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 f1 17 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007ffe336a6658 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000103 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f2dafda3a99 RDX: 00000000000021c0 RSI: 0000000020000040 RDI: 00000000ffffff9c RBP: 00007f2dafe1b5f0 R08: 0000000000004480 R09: 000055555a6784c0 R10: 0000000000000103 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007ffe336a6680 R13: 00007ffe336a68a8 R14: 431bde82d7b634db R15: 00007f2dafdec03b </TASK> ================================================================== The two reports are all caused invalid negative i_size of dir inode. For ocfs2, dir_inode can't be negative or zero. Here add a check in which is called by ocfs2_check_dir_for_entry(). It fixes the second report as ocfs2_check_dir_for_entry() must be called before ocfs2_prepare_dir_for_insert(). Also set a up limit for dir with OCFS2_INLINE_DATA_FL. The i_size can't be great than blocksize. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250106140640.92260-1-glass.su@suse.com Reported-by: Jiacheng Xu <stitch@zju.edu.cn> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/ocfs2-devel/17a04f01.1ae74.19436d003fc.Coremail.stitch@zju.edu.cn/T/#u Reported-by: syzbot+5a64828fcc4c2ad9b04f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/0000000000005894f3062018caf1@google.com/T/ Signed-off-by: Su Yue <glass.su@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com> Cc: Changwei Ge <gechangwei@live.cn> Cc: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
rodrigovivi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 27, 2025
Fix a lockdep warning [1] observed during the write combining test.
The warning indicates a potential nested lock scenario that could lead
to a deadlock.
However, this is a false positive alarm because the SF lock and its
parent lock are distinct ones.
The lockdep confusion arises because the locks belong to the same object
class (i.e., struct mlx5_core_dev).
To resolve this, the code has been refactored to avoid taking both
locks. Instead, only the parent lock is acquired.
[1]
raw_ethernet_bw/2118 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 213.619032] ffff88811dd75e08 (&dev->wc_state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
mlx5_wc_support_get+0x18c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[ 213.620270]
[ 213.620270] but task is already holding lock:
[ 213.620943] ffff88810b585e08 (&dev->wc_state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
mlx5_wc_support_get+0x10c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[ 213.622045]
[ 213.622045] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 213.622778] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 213.622778]
[ 213.623465] CPU0
[ 213.623815] ----
[ 213.624148] lock(&dev->wc_state_lock);
[ 213.624615] lock(&dev->wc_state_lock);
[ 213.625071]
[ 213.625071] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 213.625071]
[ 213.625805] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[ 213.625805]
[ 213.626522] 4 locks held by raw_ethernet_bw/2118:
[ 213.627019] #0: ffff88813f80d578 (&uverbs_dev->disassociate_srcu){.+.+}-{0:0},
at: ib_uverbs_ioctl+0xc4/0x170 [ib_uverbs]
[ 213.628088] #1: ffff88810fb23930 (&file->hw_destroy_rwsem){.+.+}-{3:3},
at: ib_init_ucontext+0x2d/0xf0 [ib_uverbs]
[ 213.629094] #2: ffff88810fb23878 (&file->ucontext_lock){+.+.}-{3:3},
at: ib_init_ucontext+0x49/0xf0 [ib_uverbs]
[ 213.630106] #3: ffff88810b585e08 (&dev->wc_state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3},
at: mlx5_wc_support_get+0x10c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[ 213.631185]
[ 213.631185] stack backtrace:
[ 213.631718] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 2118 Comm: raw_ethernet_bw Not tainted
6.12.0-rc7_internal_net_next_mlx5_89a0ad0 #1
[ 213.632722] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS
rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[ 213.633785] Call Trace:
[ 213.634099]
[ 213.634393] dump_stack_lvl+0x7e/0xc0
[ 213.634806] print_deadlock_bug+0x278/0x3c0
[ 213.635265] __lock_acquire+0x15f4/0x2c40
[ 213.635712] lock_acquire+0xcd/0x2d0
[ 213.636120] ? mlx5_wc_support_get+0x18c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[ 213.636722] ? mlx5_ib_enable_lb+0x24/0xa0 [mlx5_ib]
[ 213.637277] __mutex_lock+0x81/0xda0
[ 213.637697] ? mlx5_wc_support_get+0x18c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[ 213.638305] ? mlx5_wc_support_get+0x18c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[ 213.638902] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x70
[ 213.639400] ? mlx5_wc_support_get+0x18c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[ 213.640016] mlx5_wc_support_get+0x18c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[ 213.640615] set_ucontext_resp+0x68/0x2b0 [mlx5_ib]
[ 213.641144] ? debug_mutex_init+0x33/0x40
[ 213.641586] mlx5_ib_alloc_ucontext+0x18e/0x7b0 [mlx5_ib]
[ 213.642145] ib_init_ucontext+0xa0/0xf0 [ib_uverbs]
[ 213.642679] ib_uverbs_handler_UVERBS_METHOD_GET_CONTEXT+0x95/0xc0
[ib_uverbs]
[ 213.643426] ? _copy_from_user+0x46/0x80
[ 213.643878] ib_uverbs_cmd_verbs+0xa6b/0xc80 [ib_uverbs]
[ 213.644426] ? ib_uverbs_handler_UVERBS_METHOD_INVOKE_WRITE+0x130/0x130
[ib_uverbs]
[ 213.645213] ? __lock_acquire+0xa99/0x2c40
[ 213.645675] ? lock_acquire+0xcd/0x2d0
[ 213.646101] ? ib_uverbs_ioctl+0xc4/0x170 [ib_uverbs]
[ 213.646625] ? reacquire_held_locks+0xcf/0x1f0
[ 213.647102] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x45d/0x770
[ 213.647586] ib_uverbs_ioctl+0xe0/0x170 [ib_uverbs]
[ 213.648102] ? ib_uverbs_ioctl+0xc4/0x170 [ib_uverbs]
[ 213.648632] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x4d3/0xaa0
[ 213.649060] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x4a8/0x770
[ 213.649528] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140
[ 213.649947] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
[ 213.650478] RIP: 0033:0x7fa179b0737b
[ 213.650893] Code: ff ff ff 85 c0 79 9b 49 c7 c4 ff ff ff ff 5b 5d 4c
89 e0 41 5c c3 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa b8
10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d
7d 2a 0f 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
[ 213.652619] RSP: 002b:00007ffd2e6d46e8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX:
0000000000000010
[ 213.653390] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffd2e6d47f8 RCX:
00007fa179b0737b
[ 213.654084] RDX: 00007ffd2e6d47e0 RSI: 00000000c0181b01 RDI:
0000000000000003
[ 213.654767] RBP: 00007ffd2e6d47c0 R08: 00007fa1799be010 R09:
0000000000000002
[ 213.655453] R10: 00007ffd2e6d4960 R11: 0000000000000246 R12:
00007ffd2e6d487c
[ 213.656170] R13: 0000000000000027 R14: 0000000000000001 R15:
00007ffd2e6d4f70
Fixes: d98995b ("net/mlx5: Reimplement write combining test")
Signed-off-by: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Guralnik <michaelgur@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
rodrigovivi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 27, 2025
Clear the port select structure on error so no stale values left after
definers are destroyed. That's because the mlx5_lag_destroy_definers()
always try to destroy all lag definers in the tt_map, so in the flow
below lag definers get double-destroyed and cause kernel crash:
mlx5_lag_port_sel_create()
mlx5_lag_create_definers()
mlx5_lag_create_definer() <- Failed on tt 1
mlx5_lag_destroy_definers() <- definers[tt=0] gets destroyed
mlx5_lag_port_sel_create()
mlx5_lag_create_definers()
mlx5_lag_create_definer() <- Failed on tt 0
mlx5_lag_destroy_definers() <- definers[tt=0] gets double-destroyed
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000008
Mem abort info:
ESR = 0x0000000096000005
EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
SET = 0, FnV = 0
EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
FSC = 0x05: level 1 translation fault
Data abort info:
ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000005, ISS2 = 0x00000000
CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0
GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0
user pgtable: 64k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000112ce2e00
[0000000000000008] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000, pud=0000000000000000
Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000005 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in: iptable_raw bonding ip_gre ip6_gre gre ip6_tunnel tunnel6 geneve ip6_udp_tunnel udp_tunnel ipip tunnel4 ip_tunnel rdma_ucm(OE) rdma_cm(OE) iw_cm(OE) ib_ipoib(OE) ib_cm(OE) ib_umad(OE) mlx5_ib(OE) ib_uverbs(OE) mlx5_fwctl(OE) fwctl(OE) mlx5_core(OE) mlxdevm(OE) ib_core(OE) mlxfw(OE) memtrack(OE) mlx_compat(OE) openvswitch nsh nf_conncount psample xt_conntrack xt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink nfnetlink xfrm_user xfrm_algo xt_addrtype iptable_filter iptable_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 br_netfilter bridge stp llc netconsole overlay efi_pstore sch_fq_codel zram ip_tables crct10dif_ce qemu_fw_cfg fuse ipv6 crc_ccitt [last unloaded: mlx_compat(OE)]
CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 217 Comm: kworker/u53:2 Tainted: G OE 6.11.0+ #2
Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE
Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
Workqueue: mlx5_lag mlx5_do_bond_work [mlx5_core]
pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
pc : mlx5_del_flow_rules+0x24/0x2c0 [mlx5_core]
lr : mlx5_lag_destroy_definer+0x54/0x100 [mlx5_core]
sp : ffff800085fafb00
x29: ffff800085fafb00 x28: ffff0000da0c8000 x27: 0000000000000000
x26: ffff0000da0c8000 x25: ffff0000da0c8000 x24: ffff0000da0c8000
x23: ffff0000c31f81a0 x22: 0400000000000000 x21: ffff0000da0c8000
x20: 0000000000000000 x19: 0000000000000001 x18: 0000000000000000
x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000ffff8b0c9350
x14: 0000000000000000 x13: ffff800081390d18 x12: ffff800081dc3cc0
x11: 0000000000000001 x10: 0000000000000b10 x9 : ffff80007ab7304c
x8 : ffff0000d00711f0 x7 : 0000000000000004 x6 : 0000000000000190
x5 : ffff00027edb3010 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000000
x2 : ffff0000d39b8000 x1 : ffff0000d39b8000 x0 : 0400000000000000
Call trace:
mlx5_del_flow_rules+0x24/0x2c0 [mlx5_core]
mlx5_lag_destroy_definer+0x54/0x100 [mlx5_core]
mlx5_lag_destroy_definers+0xa0/0x108 [mlx5_core]
mlx5_lag_port_sel_create+0x2d4/0x6f8 [mlx5_core]
mlx5_activate_lag+0x60c/0x6f8 [mlx5_core]
mlx5_do_bond_work+0x284/0x5c8 [mlx5_core]
process_one_work+0x170/0x3e0
worker_thread+0x2d8/0x3e0
kthread+0x11c/0x128
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
Code: a9025bf5 aa0003f6 a90363f7 f90023f9 (f9400400)
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
Fixes: dc48516 ("net/mlx5: Lag, add support to create definers for LAG")
Signed-off-by: Mark Zhang <markzhang@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
rodrigovivi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 10, 2025
When COWing a relocation tree path, at relocation.c:replace_path(), we can trigger a lockdep splat while we are in the btrfs_search_slot() call against the relocation root. This happens in that callchain at ctree.c:read_block_for_search() when we happen to find a child extent buffer already loaded through the fs tree with a lockdep class set to the fs tree. So when we attempt to lock that extent buffer through a relocation tree we have to reset the lockdep class to the class for a relocation tree, since a relocation tree has extent buffers that used to belong to a fs tree and may currently be already loaded (we swap extent buffers between the two trees at the end of replace_path()). However we are missing calls to btrfs_maybe_reset_lockdep_class() to reset the lockdep class at ctree.c:read_block_for_search() before we read lock an extent buffer, just like we did for btrfs_search_slot() in commit b40130b ("btrfs: fix lockdep splat with reloc root extent buffers"). So add the missing btrfs_maybe_reset_lockdep_class() calls before the attempts to read lock an extent buffer at ctree.c:read_block_for_search(). The lockdep splat was reported by syzbot and it looks like this: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.13.0-rc5-syzkaller-00163-gab75170520d4 #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz.0.0/5335 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880545dbc38 (btrfs-tree-01){++++}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_read_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:146 but task is already holding lock: ffff8880545dba58 (btrfs-treloc-02/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (btrfs-treloc-02/1){+.+.}-{4:4}: reacquire_held_locks+0x3eb/0x690 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5374 __lock_release kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5563 [inline] lock_release+0x396/0xa30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5870 up_write+0x79/0x590 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1629 btrfs_force_cow_block+0x14b3/0x1fd0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:660 btrfs_cow_block+0x371/0x830 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:755 btrfs_search_slot+0xc01/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2153 replace_path+0x1243/0x2740 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1224 merge_reloc_root+0xc46/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1692 merge_reloc_roots+0x3b3/0x980 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1942 relocate_block_group+0xb0a/0xd40 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3754 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x77d/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4087 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x12c/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3494 __btrfs_balance+0x1b0f/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4278 btrfs_balance+0xbdc/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4655 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3670 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #1 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{4:4}: lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 down_write_nested+0xa2/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1693 btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189 btrfs_init_new_buffer fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5052 [inline] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x41c/0x1440 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5132 btrfs_force_cow_block+0x526/0x1fd0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:573 btrfs_cow_block+0x371/0x830 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:755 btrfs_search_slot+0xc01/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2153 btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x9c/0x1a0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:4351 btrfs_insert_empty_item fs/btrfs/ctree.h:688 [inline] btrfs_insert_inode_ref+0x2bb/0xf80 fs/btrfs/inode-item.c:330 btrfs_rename_exchange fs/btrfs/inode.c:7990 [inline] btrfs_rename2+0xcb7/0x2b90 fs/btrfs/inode.c:8374 vfs_rename+0xbdb/0xf00 fs/namei.c:5067 do_renameat2+0xd94/0x13f0 fs/namei.c:5224 __do_sys_renameat2 fs/namei.c:5258 [inline] __se_sys_renameat2 fs/namei.c:5255 [inline] __x64_sys_renameat2+0xce/0xe0 fs/namei.c:5255 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #0 (btrfs-tree-01){++++}-{4:4}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline] validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904 __lock_acquire+0x1397/0x2100 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5226 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 down_read_nested+0xb5/0xa50 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1649 btrfs_tree_read_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:146 btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.h:188 [inline] read_block_for_search+0x718/0xbb0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1610 btrfs_search_slot+0x1274/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2237 replace_path+0x1243/0x2740 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1224 merge_reloc_root+0xc46/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1692 merge_reloc_roots+0x3b3/0x980 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1942 relocate_block_group+0xb0a/0xd40 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3754 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x77d/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4087 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x12c/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3494 __btrfs_balance+0x1b0f/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4278 btrfs_balance+0xbdc/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4655 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3670 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: btrfs-tree-01 --> btrfs-tree-01/1 --> btrfs-treloc-02/1 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(btrfs-treloc-02/1); lock(btrfs-tree-01/1); lock(btrfs-treloc-02/1); rlock(btrfs-tree-01); *** DEADLOCK *** 8 locks held by syz.0.0/5335: #0: ffff88801e3ae420 (sb_writers#13){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write_file+0x5e/0x200 fs/namespace.c:559 #1: ffff888052c760d0 (&fs_info->reclaim_bgs_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __btrfs_balance+0x4c2/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4183 #2: ffff888052c74850 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x775/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4086 #3: ffff88801e3ae610 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: merge_reloc_root+0xf11/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1659 #4: ffff888052c76470 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x405/0xda0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:288 #5: ffff888052c76498 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x405/0xda0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:288 #6: ffff8880545db878 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189 #7: ffff8880545dba58 (btrfs-treloc-02/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5335 Comm: syz.0.0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc5-syzkaller-00163-gab75170520d4 #0 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_circular_bug+0x13a/0x1b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2074 check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2206 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline] validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904 __lock_acquire+0x1397/0x2100 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5226 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 down_read_nested+0xb5/0xa50 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1649 btrfs_tree_read_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:146 btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.h:188 [inline] read_block_for_search+0x718/0xbb0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1610 btrfs_search_slot+0x1274/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2237 replace_path+0x1243/0x2740 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1224 merge_reloc_root+0xc46/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1692 merge_reloc_roots+0x3b3/0x980 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1942 relocate_block_group+0xb0a/0xd40 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3754 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x77d/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4087 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x12c/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3494 __btrfs_balance+0x1b0f/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4278 btrfs_balance+0xbdc/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4655 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3670 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f1ac6985d29 Code: ff ff c3 (...) RSP: 002b:00007f1ac63fe038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f1ac6b76160 RCX: 00007f1ac6985d29 RDX: 0000000020000180 RSI: 00000000c4009420 RDI: 0000000000000007 RBP: 00007f1ac6a01b08 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 00007f1ac6b76160 R15: 00007fffda145a88 </TASK> Reported-by: syzbot+63913e558c084f7f8fdc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/677b3014.050a0220.3b53b0.0064.GAE@google.com/ Fixes: 9978599 ("btrfs: reduce lock contention when eb cache miss for btree search") Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
rodrigovivi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 18, 2025
We have several places across the kernel where we want to access another
task's syscall arguments, such as ptrace(2), seccomp(2), etc., by making
a call to syscall_get_arguments().
This works for register arguments right away by accessing the task's
`regs' member of `struct pt_regs', however for stack arguments seen with
32-bit/o32 kernels things are more complicated. Technically they ought
to be obtained from the user stack with calls to an access_remote_vm(),
but we have an easier way available already.
So as to be able to access syscall stack arguments as regular function
arguments following the MIPS calling convention we copy them over from
the user stack to the kernel stack in arch/mips/kernel/scall32-o32.S, in
handle_sys(), to the current stack frame's outgoing argument space at
the top of the stack, which is where the handler called expects to see
its incoming arguments. This area is also pointed at by the `pt_regs'
pointer obtained by task_pt_regs().
Make the o32 stack argument space a proper member of `struct pt_regs'
then, by renaming the existing member from `pad0' to `args' and using
generated offsets to access the space. No functional change though.
With the change in place the o32 kernel stack frame layout at the entry
to a syscall handler invoked by handle_sys() is therefore as follows:
$sp + 68 -> | ... | <- pt_regs.regs[9]
+---------------------+
$sp + 64 -> | $t0 | <- pt_regs.regs[8]
+---------------------+
$sp + 60 -> | $a3/argument #4 | <- pt_regs.regs[7]
+---------------------+
$sp + 56 -> | $a2/argument #3 | <- pt_regs.regs[6]
+---------------------+
$sp + 52 -> | $a1/argument #2 | <- pt_regs.regs[5]
+---------------------+
$sp + 48 -> | $a0/argument #1 | <- pt_regs.regs[4]
+---------------------+
$sp + 44 -> | $v1 | <- pt_regs.regs[3]
+---------------------+
$sp + 40 -> | $v0 | <- pt_regs.regs[2]
+---------------------+
$sp + 36 -> | $at | <- pt_regs.regs[1]
+---------------------+
$sp + 32 -> | $zero | <- pt_regs.regs[0]
+---------------------+
$sp + 28 -> | stack argument #8 | <- pt_regs.args[7]
+---------------------+
$sp + 24 -> | stack argument #7 | <- pt_regs.args[6]
+---------------------+
$sp + 20 -> | stack argument #6 | <- pt_regs.args[5]
+---------------------+
$sp + 16 -> | stack argument #5 | <- pt_regs.args[4]
+---------------------+
$sp + 12 -> | psABI space for $a3 | <- pt_regs.args[3]
+---------------------+
$sp + 8 -> | psABI space for $a2 | <- pt_regs.args[2]
+---------------------+
$sp + 4 -> | psABI space for $a1 | <- pt_regs.args[1]
+---------------------+
$sp + 0 -> | psABI space for $a0 | <- pt_regs.args[0]
+---------------------+
holding user data received and with the first 4 frame slots reserved by
the psABI for the compiler to spill the incoming arguments from $a0-$a3
registers (which it sometimes does according to its needs) and the next
4 frame slots designated by the psABI for any stack function arguments
that follow. This data is also available for other tasks to peek/poke
at as reqired and where permitted.
Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@orcam.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
rodrigovivi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 18, 2025
…/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into HEAD KVM/arm64 fixes for 6.14, take #2 - Large set of fixes for vector handling, specially in the interactions between host and guest state. This fixes a number of bugs affecting actual deployments, and greatly simplifies the FP/SIMD/SVE handling. Thanks to Mark Rutland for dealing with this thankless task. - Fix an ugly race between vcpu and vgic creation/init, resulting in unexpected behaviours. - Fix use of kernel VAs at EL2 when emulating timers with nVHE. - Small set of pKVM improvements and cleanups.
rodrigovivi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 3, 2025
Since commit 6037802 ("power: supply: core: implement extension API") there is the following ABBA deadlock (simplified) between the LED trigger code and the power-supply code: 1) When registering a power-supply class device, power_supply_register() calls led_trigger_register() from power_supply_create_triggers() in a scoped_guard(rwsem_read, &psy->extensions_sem) context. led_trigger_register() then in turn takes a LED subsystem lock. So here we have the following locking order: * Read-lock extensions_sem * Lock LED subsystem lock(s) 2) When registering a LED class device, with its default trigger set to a power-supply LED trigger (which has already been registered) The LED class code calls power_supply_led_trigger_activate() when setting up the default trigger. power_supply_led_trigger_activate() calls power_supply_get_property() to determine the initial value of to assign to the LED and that read-locks extensions_sem. So now we have the following locking order: * Lock LED subsystem lock(s) * Read-lock extensions_sem Fixing this is easy, there is no need to hold the extensions_sem when calling power_supply_create_triggers() since all triggers are always created rather then checking for the presence of certain attributes as power_supply_add_hwmon_sysfs() does. Move power_supply_create_triggers() out of the guard block to fix this. Here is the lockdep report fixed by this change: [ 31.249343] ====================================================== [ 31.249378] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 31.249413] 6.13.0-rc6+ #251 Tainted: G C E [ 31.249440] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 31.249471] (udev-worker)/553 is trying to acquire lock: [ 31.249501] ffff892adbcaf660 (&psy->extensions_sem){.+.+}-{4:4}, at: power_supply_get_property.part.0+0x22/0x150 [ 31.249574] but task is already holding lock: [ 31.249603] ffff892adbc0bad0 (&led_cdev->trigger_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: led_trigger_set_default+0x34/0xe0 [ 31.249657] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 31.249696] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 31.249735] -> #2 (&led_cdev->trigger_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: [ 31.249778] down_write+0x3b/0xd0 [ 31.249803] led_trigger_set_default+0x34/0xe0 [ 31.249833] led_classdev_register_ext+0x311/0x3a0 [ 31.249863] input_leds_connect+0x1dc/0x2a0 [ 31.249889] input_attach_handler.isra.0+0x75/0x90 [ 31.249921] input_register_device.cold+0xa1/0x150 [ 31.249955] hidinput_connect+0x8a2/0xb80 [ 31.249982] hid_connect+0x582/0x5c0 [ 31.250007] hid_hw_start+0x3f/0x60 [ 31.250030] hid_device_probe+0x122/0x1f0 [ 31.250053] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.250080] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.250105] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.250132] __device_attach_driver+0x85/0x110 [ 31.250160] bus_for_each_drv+0x78/0xc0 [ 31.250184] __device_attach+0xb0/0x1b0 [ 31.250207] bus_probe_device+0x94/0xb0 [ 31.250230] device_add+0x64a/0x860 [ 31.250252] hid_add_device+0xe5/0x240 [ 31.250279] usbhid_probe+0x4dc/0x620 [ 31.250303] usb_probe_interface+0xe4/0x2a0 [ 31.250329] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.250353] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.250377] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.250404] __device_attach_driver+0x85/0x110 [ 31.250431] bus_for_each_drv+0x78/0xc0 [ 31.250455] __device_attach+0xb0/0x1b0 [ 31.250478] bus_probe_device+0x94/0xb0 [ 31.250501] device_add+0x64a/0x860 [ 31.250523] usb_set_configuration+0x606/0x8a0 [ 31.250552] usb_generic_driver_probe+0x3e/0x60 [ 31.250579] usb_probe_device+0x3d/0x120 [ 31.250605] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.250629] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.250653] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.250680] __device_attach_driver+0x85/0x110 [ 31.250707] bus_for_each_drv+0x78/0xc0 [ 31.250731] __device_attach+0xb0/0x1b0 [ 31.250753] bus_probe_device+0x94/0xb0 [ 31.250776] device_add+0x64a/0x860 [ 31.250798] usb_new_device.cold+0x141/0x38f [ 31.250828] hub_event+0x1166/0x1980 [ 31.250854] process_one_work+0x20f/0x580 [ 31.250879] worker_thread+0x1d1/0x3b0 [ 31.250904] kthread+0xee/0x120 [ 31.250926] ret_from_fork+0x30/0x50 [ 31.250954] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 31.250982] -> #1 (triggers_list_lock){++++}-{4:4}: [ 31.251022] down_write+0x3b/0xd0 [ 31.251045] led_trigger_register+0x40/0x1b0 [ 31.251074] power_supply_register_led_trigger+0x88/0x150 [ 31.251107] power_supply_create_triggers+0x55/0xe0 [ 31.251135] __power_supply_register.part.0+0x34e/0x4a0 [ 31.251164] devm_power_supply_register+0x70/0xc0 [ 31.251190] bq27xxx_battery_setup+0x1a1/0x6d0 [bq27xxx_battery] [ 31.251235] bq27xxx_battery_i2c_probe+0xe5/0x17f [bq27xxx_battery_i2c] [ 31.251272] i2c_device_probe+0x125/0x2b0 [ 31.251299] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.251324] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.251348] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.251375] __driver_attach+0xba/0x1c0 [ 31.251398] bus_for_each_dev+0x6b/0xb0 [ 31.251421] bus_add_driver+0x111/0x1f0 [ 31.251445] driver_register+0x6e/0xc0 [ 31.251470] i2c_register_driver+0x41/0xb0 [ 31.251498] do_one_initcall+0x5e/0x3a0 [ 31.251522] do_init_module+0x60/0x220 [ 31.251550] __do_sys_init_module+0x15f/0x190 [ 31.251575] do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180 [ 31.251598] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 31.251629] -> #0 (&psy->extensions_sem){.+.+}-{4:4}: [ 31.251668] __lock_acquire+0x13ce/0x21c0 [ 31.251694] lock_acquire+0xcf/0x2e0 [ 31.251719] down_read+0x3e/0x170 [ 31.251741] power_supply_get_property.part.0+0x22/0x150 [ 31.251774] power_supply_update_leds+0x8d/0x230 [ 31.251804] power_supply_led_trigger_activate+0x18/0x20 [ 31.251837] led_trigger_set+0x1fc/0x300 [ 31.251863] led_trigger_set_default+0x90/0xe0 [ 31.251892] led_classdev_register_ext+0x311/0x3a0 [ 31.251921] devm_led_classdev_multicolor_register_ext+0x6e/0xb80 [led_class_multicolor] [ 31.251969] ktd202x_probe+0x464/0x5c0 [leds_ktd202x] [ 31.252002] i2c_device_probe+0x125/0x2b0 [ 31.252027] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.252052] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.252076] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.252103] __driver_attach+0xba/0x1c0 [ 31.252125] bus_for_each_dev+0x6b/0xb0 [ 31.252148] bus_add_driver+0x111/0x1f0 [ 31.252172] driver_register+0x6e/0xc0 [ 31.252197] i2c_register_driver+0x41/0xb0 [ 31.252225] do_one_initcall+0x5e/0x3a0 [ 31.252248] do_init_module+0x60/0x220 [ 31.252274] __do_sys_init_module+0x15f/0x190 [ 31.253986] do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180 [ 31.255826] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 31.257614] other info that might help us debug this: [ 31.257619] Chain exists of: &psy->extensions_sem --> triggers_list_lock --> &led_cdev->trigger_lock [ 31.257630] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 31.257632] CPU0 CPU1 [ 31.257633] ---- ---- [ 31.257634] lock(&led_cdev->trigger_lock); [ 31.257637] lock(triggers_list_lock); [ 31.257640] lock(&led_cdev->trigger_lock); [ 31.257643] rlock(&psy->extensions_sem); [ 31.257646] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 31.289433] 4 locks held by (udev-worker)/553: [ 31.289443] #0: ffff892ad9658108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __driver_attach+0xaf/0x1c0 [ 31.289463] #1: ffff892adbc0bbc8 (&led_cdev->led_access){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: led_classdev_register_ext+0x1c7/0x3a0 [ 31.289476] #2: ffffffffad0e30b0 (triggers_list_lock){++++}-{4:4}, at: led_trigger_set_default+0x2c/0xe0 [ 31.289487] #3: ffff892adbc0bad0 (&led_cdev->trigger_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: led_trigger_set_default+0x34/0xe0 Fixes: 6037802 ("power: supply: core: implement extension API") Cc: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net> Cc: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250130140035.20636-1-hdegoede@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
rodrigovivi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 3, 2025
…ea as VM_ALLOC Erhard reported the following KASAN hit while booting his PowerMac G4 with a KASAN-enabled kernel 6.13-rc6: BUG: KASAN: vmalloc-out-of-bounds in copy_to_kernel_nofault+0xd8/0x1c8 Write of size 8 at addr f1000000 by task chronyd/1293 CPU: 0 UID: 123 PID: 1293 Comm: chronyd Tainted: G W 6.13.0-rc6-PMacG4 #2 Tainted: [W]=WARN Hardware name: PowerMac3,6 7455 0x80010303 PowerMac Call Trace: [c2437590] [c1631a84] dump_stack_lvl+0x70/0x8c (unreliable) [c24375b0] [c0504998] print_report+0xdc/0x504 [c2437610] [c050475c] kasan_report+0xf8/0x108 [c2437690] [c0505a3c] kasan_check_range+0x24/0x18c [c24376a0] [c03fb5e4] copy_to_kernel_nofault+0xd8/0x1c8 [c24376c0] [c004c014] patch_instructions+0x15c/0x16c [c2437710] [c00731a8] bpf_arch_text_copy+0x60/0x7c [c2437730] [c0281168] bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize+0x50/0xac [c2437750] [c0073cf4] bpf_int_jit_compile+0xb30/0xdec [c2437880] [c0280394] bpf_prog_select_runtime+0x15c/0x478 [c24378d0] [c1263428] bpf_prepare_filter+0xbf8/0xc14 [c2437990] [c12677ec] bpf_prog_create_from_user+0x258/0x2b4 [c24379d0] [c027111c] do_seccomp+0x3dc/0x1890 [c2437ac0] [c001d8e0] system_call_exception+0x2dc/0x420 [c2437f30] [c00281ac] ret_from_syscall+0x0/0x2c --- interrupt: c00 at 0x5a1274 NIP: 005a1274 LR: 006a3b3c CTR: 005296c8 REGS: c2437f40 TRAP: 0c00 Tainted: G W (6.13.0-rc6-PMacG4) MSR: 0200f932 <VEC,EE,PR,FP,ME,IR,DR,RI> CR: 24004422 XER: 00000000 GPR00: 00000166 af8f3fa0 a7ee3540 00000001 00000000 013b6500 005a5858 0200f932 GPR08: 00000000 00001fe9 013d5fc8 005296c8 2822244c 00b2fcd8 00000000 af8f4b57 GPR16: 00000000 00000001 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000001 00000000 00000002 GPR24: 00afdbb0 00000000 00000000 00000000 006e0004 013ce060 006e7c1c 00000001 NIP [005a1274] 0x5a1274 LR [006a3b3c] 0x6a3b3c --- interrupt: c00 The buggy address belongs to the virtual mapping at [f1000000, f1002000) created by: text_area_cpu_up+0x20/0x190 The buggy address belongs to the physical page: page: refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:00000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x76e30 flags: 0x80000000(zone=2) raw: 80000000 00000000 00000122 00000000 00000000 00000000 ffffffff 00000001 raw: 00000000 page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected Memory state around the buggy address: f0ffff00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f0ffff80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >f1000000: f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 ^ f1000080: f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f1000100: f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 ================================================================== f8 corresponds to KASAN_VMALLOC_INVALID which means the area is not initialised hence not supposed to be used yet. Powerpc text patching infrastructure allocates a virtual memory area using get_vm_area() and flags it as VM_ALLOC. But that flag is meant to be used for vmalloc() and vmalloc() allocated memory is not supposed to be used before a call to __vmalloc_node_range() which is never called for that area. That went undetected until commit e4137f0 ("mm, kasan, kmsan: instrument copy_from/to_kernel_nofault") The area allocated by text_area_cpu_up() is not vmalloc memory, it is mapped directly on demand when needed by map_kernel_page(). There is no VM flag corresponding to such usage, so just pass no flag. That way the area will be unpoisonned and usable immediately. Reported-by: Erhard Furtner <erhard_f@mailbox.org> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250112135832.57c92322@yea/ Fixes: 37bc3e5 ("powerpc/lib/code-patching: Use alternate map for patch_instruction()") Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/06621423da339b374f48c0886e3a5db18e896be8.1739342693.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
rodrigovivi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 3, 2025
…void Priority Inversion in SRIOV
RLCG Register Access is a way for virtual functions to safely access GPU
registers in a virtualized environment., including TLB flushes and
register reads. When multiple threads or VFs try to access the same
registers simultaneously, it can lead to race conditions. By using the
RLCG interface, the driver can serialize access to the registers. This
means that only one thread can access the registers at a time,
preventing conflicts and ensuring that operations are performed
correctly. Additionally, when a low-priority task holds a mutex that a
high-priority task needs, ie., If a thread holding a spinlock tries to
acquire a mutex, it can lead to priority inversion. register access in
amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw especially in a fast code path is critical.
The call stack shows that the function amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw is being
called, which attempts to acquire the mutex. This function is invoked
from amdgpu_sriov_wreg, which in turn is called from
gmc_v11_0_flush_gpu_tlb.
The [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] indicates that a thread is trying to
acquire a mutex while it is in a context that does not allow it to sleep
(like holding a spinlock).
Fixes the below:
[ 253.013423] =============================
[ 253.013434] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
[ 253.013446] 6.12.0-amdstaging-drm-next-lol-050225 #14 Tainted: G U OE
[ 253.013464] -----------------------------
[ 253.013475] kworker/0:1/10 is trying to lock:
[ 253.013487] ffff9f30542e3cf8 (&adev->virt.rlcg_reg_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw+0xf6/0x330 [amdgpu]
[ 253.013815] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 253.013827] context-{4:4}
[ 253.013835] 3 locks held by kworker/0:1/10:
[ 253.013847] #0: ffff9f3040050f58 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x3f5/0x680
[ 253.013877] #1: ffffb789c008be40 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1d6/0x680
[ 253.013905] #2: ffff9f3054281838 (&adev->gmc.invalidate_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: gmc_v11_0_flush_gpu_tlb+0x198/0x4f0 [amdgpu]
[ 253.014154] stack backtrace:
[ 253.014164] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 10 Comm: kworker/0:1 Tainted: G U OE 6.12.0-amdstaging-drm-next-lol-050225 #14
[ 253.014189] Tainted: [U]=USER, [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE
[ 253.014203] Hardware name: Microsoft Corporation Virtual Machine/Virtual Machine, BIOS Hyper-V UEFI Release v4.1 11/18/2024
[ 253.014224] Workqueue: events work_for_cpu_fn
[ 253.014241] Call Trace:
[ 253.014250] <TASK>
[ 253.014260] dump_stack_lvl+0x9b/0xf0
[ 253.014275] dump_stack+0x10/0x20
[ 253.014287] __lock_acquire+0xa47/0x2810
[ 253.014303] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[ 253.014321] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300
[ 253.014333] ? amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw+0xf6/0x330 [amdgpu]
[ 253.014562] ? __lock_acquire+0xa6b/0x2810
[ 253.014578] __mutex_lock+0x85/0xe20
[ 253.014591] ? amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw+0xf6/0x330 [amdgpu]
[ 253.014782] ? sched_clock_noinstr+0x9/0x10
[ 253.014795] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[ 253.014808] ? local_clock_noinstr+0xe/0xc0
[ 253.014822] ? amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw+0xf6/0x330 [amdgpu]
[ 253.015012] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[ 253.015029] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30
[ 253.015044] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30
[ 253.015057] amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw+0xf6/0x330 [amdgpu]
[ 253.015249] amdgpu_sriov_wreg+0xc5/0xd0 [amdgpu]
[ 253.015435] gmc_v11_0_flush_gpu_tlb+0x44b/0x4f0 [amdgpu]
[ 253.015667] gfx_v11_0_hw_init+0x499/0x29c0 [amdgpu]
[ 253.015901] ? __pfx_smu_v13_0_update_pcie_parameters+0x10/0x10 [amdgpu]
[ 253.016159] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[ 253.016173] ? smu_hw_init+0x18d/0x300 [amdgpu]
[ 253.016403] amdgpu_device_init+0x29ad/0x36a0 [amdgpu]
[ 253.016614] amdgpu_driver_load_kms+0x1a/0xc0 [amdgpu]
[ 253.017057] amdgpu_pci_probe+0x1c2/0x660 [amdgpu]
[ 253.017493] local_pci_probe+0x4b/0xb0
[ 253.017746] work_for_cpu_fn+0x1a/0x30
[ 253.017995] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680
[ 253.018248] worker_thread+0x190/0x330
[ 253.018500] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
[ 253.018746] kthread+0xe7/0x120
[ 253.018988] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[ 253.019231] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60
[ 253.019468] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[ 253.019701] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
[ 253.019939] </TASK>
v2: s/spin_trylock/spin_lock_irqsave to be safe (Christian).
Fixes: e864180 ("drm/amdgpu: Add lock around VF RLCG interface")
Cc: lin cao <lin.cao@amd.com>
Cc: Jingwen Chen <Jingwen.Chen2@amd.com>
Cc: Victor Skvortsov <victor.skvortsov@amd.com>
Cc: Zhigang Luo <zhigang.luo@amd.com>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Srinivasan Shanmugam <srinivasan.shanmugam@amd.com>
Suggested-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
rodrigovivi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 3, 2025
…ate_pagetables'
This commit addresses a circular locking dependency in the
svm_range_cpu_invalidate_pagetables function. The function previously
held a lock while determining whether to perform an unmap or eviction
operation, which could lead to deadlocks.
Fixes the below:
[ 223.418794] ======================================================
[ 223.418820] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 223.418845] 6.12.0-amdstaging-drm-next-lol-050225 #14 Tainted: G U OE
[ 223.418869] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 223.418889] kfdtest/3939 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 223.418906] ffff8957552eae38 (&dqm->lock_hidden){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: evict_process_queues_cpsch+0x43/0x210 [amdgpu]
[ 223.419302]
but task is already holding lock:
[ 223.419303] ffff8957556b83b0 (&prange->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: svm_range_cpu_invalidate_pagetables+0x9d/0x850 [amdgpu]
[ 223.419447] Console: switching to colour dummy device 80x25
[ 223.419477] [IGT] amd_basic: executing
[ 223.419599]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 223.419611]
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 223.419621]
-> #2 (&prange->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[ 223.419636] __mutex_lock+0x85/0xe20
[ 223.419647] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30
[ 223.419656] svm_range_validate_and_map+0x2f1/0x15b0 [amdgpu]
[ 223.419954] svm_range_set_attr+0xe8c/0x1710 [amdgpu]
[ 223.420236] svm_ioctl+0x46/0x50 [amdgpu]
[ 223.420503] kfd_ioctl_svm+0x50/0x90 [amdgpu]
[ 223.420763] kfd_ioctl+0x409/0x6d0 [amdgpu]
[ 223.421024] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x95/0xd0
[ 223.421036] x64_sys_call+0x1205/0x20d0
[ 223.421047] do_syscall_64+0x87/0x140
[ 223.421056] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
[ 223.421068]
-> #1 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[ 223.421084] __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.0+0xab/0x1560
[ 223.421095] ww_mutex_lock+0x2b/0x90
[ 223.421103] amdgpu_amdkfd_alloc_gtt_mem+0xcc/0x2b0 [amdgpu]
[ 223.421361] add_queue_mes+0x3bc/0x440 [amdgpu]
[ 223.421623] unhalt_cpsch+0x1ae/0x240 [amdgpu]
[ 223.421888] kgd2kfd_start_sched+0x5e/0xd0 [amdgpu]
[ 223.422148] amdgpu_amdkfd_start_sched+0x3d/0x50 [amdgpu]
[ 223.422414] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_handler+0x132/0x270 [amdgpu]
[ 223.422662] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680
[ 223.422673] worker_thread+0x190/0x330
[ 223.422682] kthread+0xe7/0x120
[ 223.422690] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60
[ 223.422699] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
[ 223.422708]
-> #0 (&dqm->lock_hidden){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[ 223.422723] __lock_acquire+0x16f4/0x2810
[ 223.422734] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300
[ 223.422742] __mutex_lock+0x85/0xe20
[ 223.422751] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30
[ 223.422760] evict_process_queues_cpsch+0x43/0x210 [amdgpu]
[ 223.423025] kfd_process_evict_queues+0x8a/0x1d0 [amdgpu]
[ 223.423285] kgd2kfd_quiesce_mm+0x43/0x90 [amdgpu]
[ 223.423540] svm_range_cpu_invalidate_pagetables+0x4a7/0x850 [amdgpu]
[ 223.423807] __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start+0x1f5/0x250
[ 223.423819] copy_page_range+0x1e94/0x1ea0
[ 223.423829] copy_process+0x172f/0x2ad0
[ 223.423839] kernel_clone+0x9c/0x3f0
[ 223.423847] __do_sys_clone+0x66/0x90
[ 223.423856] __x64_sys_clone+0x25/0x30
[ 223.423864] x64_sys_call+0x1d7c/0x20d0
[ 223.423872] do_syscall_64+0x87/0x140
[ 223.423880] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
[ 223.423891]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 223.423903] Chain exists of:
&dqm->lock_hidden --> reservation_ww_class_mutex --> &prange->lock
[ 223.423926] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 223.423935] CPU0 CPU1
[ 223.423942] ---- ----
[ 223.423949] lock(&prange->lock);
[ 223.423958] lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex);
[ 223.423970] lock(&prange->lock);
[ 223.423981] lock(&dqm->lock_hidden);
[ 223.423990]
*** DEADLOCK ***
[ 223.423999] 5 locks held by kfdtest/3939:
[ 223.424006] #0: ffffffffb82b4fc0 (dup_mmap_sem){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: copy_process+0x1387/0x2ad0
[ 223.424026] #1: ffff89575eda81b0 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: copy_process+0x13a8/0x2ad0
[ 223.424046] #2: ffff89575edaf3b0 (&mm->mmap_lock/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: copy_process+0x13e4/0x2ad0
[ 223.424066] #3: ffffffffb82e76e0 (mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: copy_page_range+0x1cea/0x1ea0
[ 223.424088] #4: ffff8957556b83b0 (&prange->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: svm_range_cpu_invalidate_pagetables+0x9d/0x850 [amdgpu]
[ 223.424365]
stack backtrace:
[ 223.424374] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 3939 Comm: kfdtest Tainted: G U OE 6.12.0-amdstaging-drm-next-lol-050225 #14
[ 223.424392] Tainted: [U]=USER, [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE
[ 223.424401] Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. X570 AORUS PRO WIFI/X570 AORUS PRO WIFI, BIOS F36a 02/16/2022
[ 223.424416] Call Trace:
[ 223.424423] <TASK>
[ 223.424430] dump_stack_lvl+0x9b/0xf0
[ 223.424441] dump_stack+0x10/0x20
[ 223.424449] print_circular_bug+0x275/0x350
[ 223.424460] check_noncircular+0x157/0x170
[ 223.424469] ? __bfs+0xfd/0x2c0
[ 223.424481] __lock_acquire+0x16f4/0x2810
[ 223.424490] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[ 223.424505] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300
[ 223.424514] ? evict_process_queues_cpsch+0x43/0x210 [amdgpu]
[ 223.424783] __mutex_lock+0x85/0xe20
[ 223.424792] ? evict_process_queues_cpsch+0x43/0x210 [amdgpu]
[ 223.425058] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[ 223.425067] ? mark_held_locks+0x54/0x90
[ 223.425076] ? evict_process_queues_cpsch+0x43/0x210 [amdgpu]
[ 223.425339] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[ 223.425350] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30
[ 223.425358] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30
[ 223.425367] evict_process_queues_cpsch+0x43/0x210 [amdgpu]
[ 223.425631] kfd_process_evict_queues+0x8a/0x1d0 [amdgpu]
[ 223.425893] kgd2kfd_quiesce_mm+0x43/0x90 [amdgpu]
[ 223.426156] svm_range_cpu_invalidate_pagetables+0x4a7/0x850 [amdgpu]
[ 223.426423] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[ 223.426436] __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start+0x1f5/0x250
[ 223.426450] copy_page_range+0x1e94/0x1ea0
[ 223.426461] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[ 223.426474] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[ 223.426484] ? lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300
[ 223.426494] ? copy_process+0x1718/0x2ad0
[ 223.426502] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[ 223.426510] ? sched_clock_noinstr+0x9/0x10
[ 223.426519] ? local_clock_noinstr+0xe/0xc0
[ 223.426528] ? copy_process+0x1718/0x2ad0
[ 223.426537] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[ 223.426550] copy_process+0x172f/0x2ad0
[ 223.426569] kernel_clone+0x9c/0x3f0
[ 223.426577] ? __schedule+0x4c9/0x1b00
[ 223.426586] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[ 223.426594] ? sched_clock_noinstr+0x9/0x10
[ 223.426602] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[ 223.426610] ? local_clock_noinstr+0xe/0xc0
[ 223.426619] ? schedule+0x107/0x1a0
[ 223.426629] __do_sys_clone+0x66/0x90
[ 223.426643] __x64_sys_clone+0x25/0x30
[ 223.426652] x64_sys_call+0x1d7c/0x20d0
[ 223.426661] do_syscall_64+0x87/0x140
[ 223.426671] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[ 223.426679] ? common_nsleep+0x44/0x50
[ 223.426690] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[ 223.426698] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0x52/0xd0
[ 223.426709] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[ 223.426717] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0xcc/0x200
[ 223.426727] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[ 223.426736] ? do_syscall_64+0x93/0x140
[ 223.426748] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[ 223.426756] ? up_write+0x1c/0x1e0
[ 223.426765] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[ 223.426775] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[ 223.426783] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0x52/0xd0
[ 223.426792] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[ 223.426800] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0xcc/0x200
[ 223.426810] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[ 223.426818] ? do_syscall_64+0x93/0x140
[ 223.426826] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0xcc/0x200
[ 223.426836] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[ 223.426844] ? do_syscall_64+0x93/0x140
[ 223.426853] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[ 223.426861] ? irqentry_exit+0x6b/0x90
[ 223.426869] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[ 223.426877] ? exc_page_fault+0xa7/0x2c0
[ 223.426888] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
[ 223.426898] RIP: 0033:0x7f46758eab57
[ 223.426906] Code: ba 04 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 48 8b 04 25 10 00 00 00 45 31 c0 31 d2 31 f6 bf 11 00 20 01 4c 8d 90 d0 02 00 00 b8 38 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 41 41 89 c0 85 c0 75 2c 64 48 8b 04 25 10 00
[ 223.426930] RSP: 002b:00007fff5c3e5188 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000038
[ 223.426943] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f4675f8c040 RCX: 00007f46758eab57
[ 223.426954] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000001200011
[ 223.426965] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[ 223.426975] R10: 00007f4675e81a50 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001
[ 223.426986] R13: 00007fff5c3e5470 R14: 00007fff5c3e53e0 R15: 00007fff5c3e5410
[ 223.427004] </TASK>
v2: To resolve this issue, the allocation of the process context buffer
(`proc_ctx_bo`) has been moved from the `add_queue_mes` function to the
`pqm_create_queue` function. This change ensures that the buffer is
allocated only when the first queue for a process is created and only if
the Micro Engine Scheduler (MES) is enabled. (Felix)
v3: Fix typo s/Memory Execution Scheduler (MES)/Micro Engine Scheduler
in commit message. (Lijo)
Fixes: 438b39a ("drm/amdkfd: pause autosuspend when creating pdd")
Cc: Jesse Zhang <jesse.zhang@amd.com>
Cc: Yunxiang Li <Yunxiang.Li@amd.com>
Cc: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@amd.com>
Cc: Alex Sierra <alex.sierra@amd.com>
Cc: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Srinivasan Shanmugam <srinivasan.shanmugam@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
rodrigovivi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 3, 2025
If waiting for gpu reset done in KFD release_work, thers is WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected #2 kfd_create_process kfd_process_mutex flush kfd release work #1 kfd release work wait for amdgpu reset work #0 amdgpu_device_gpu_reset kgd2kfd_pre_reset kfd_process_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock((work_completion)(&p->release_work)); lock((wq_completion)kfd_process_wq); lock((work_completion)(&p->release_work)); lock((wq_completion)amdgpu-reset-dev); To fix this, KFD create process move flush release work outside kfd_process_mutex. Signed-off-by: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
rodrigovivi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 3, 2025
Move perf mode handling for the bandwidth to _dpu_core_perf_crtc_update_bus() rather than overriding per-CRTC data and then aggregating known values. Note, this changes the fix_core_ab_vote. Previously it would be multiplied per the CRTC number, now it will be used directly for interconnect voting. This better reflects user requirements in the case of different resolutions being set on different CRTCs: instead of using the same bandwidth for each CRTC (which is incorrect) user can now calculate overall bandwidth required by all outputs and use that value. Note #2: this also disables threshold checks for user-entered bandwidth values. First of all, it doesn't make sense to fail atomic commits because of the debugfs input. Compositors have no way to correlate failing commits with debugfs settings. Second, it makes sense to allow users to go beyond these values and check whether this makes any difference or fixes the issue. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/636072/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250209-dpu-perf-rework-v5-8-87e936cf3004@linaro.org
rodrigovivi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 3, 2025
Use raw_spinlock in order to fix spurious messages about invalid context
when spinlock debugging is enabled. The lock is only used to serialize
register access.
[ 4.239592] =============================
[ 4.239595] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
[ 4.239599] 6.13.0-rc7-arm64-renesas-05496-gd088502a519f #35 Not tainted
[ 4.239603] -----------------------------
[ 4.239606] kworker/u8:5/76 is trying to lock:
[ 4.239609] ffff0000091898a0 (&p->lock){....}-{3:3}, at: gpio_rcar_config_interrupt_input_mode+0x34/0x164
[ 4.239641] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 4.239643] context-{5:5}
[ 4.239646] 5 locks held by kworker/u8:5/76:
[ 4.239651] #0: ffff0000080fb148 ((wq_completion)async){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x190/0x62c
[ 4.250180] OF: /soc/sound@ec500000/ports/port@0/endpoint: Read of boolean property 'frame-master' with a value.
[ 4.254094] #1: ffff80008299bd80 ((work_completion)(&entry->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1b8/0x62c
[ 4.254109] #2: ffff00000920c8f8
[ 4.258345] OF: /soc/sound@ec500000/ports/port@1/endpoint: Read of boolean property 'bitclock-master' with a value.
[ 4.264803] (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_attach_async_helper+0x3c/0xdc
[ 4.264820] #3: ffff00000a50ca40 (request_class#2){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __setup_irq+0xa0/0x690
[ 4.264840] #4:
[ 4.268872] OF: /soc/sound@ec500000/ports/port@1/endpoint: Read of boolean property 'frame-master' with a value.
[ 4.273275] ffff00000a50c8c8 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: __setup_irq+0xc4/0x690
[ 4.296130] renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac ee100000.mmc: mmc1 base at 0x00000000ee100000, max clock rate 200 MHz
[ 4.304082] stack backtrace:
[ 4.304086] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 76 Comm: kworker/u8:5 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc7-arm64-renesas-05496-gd088502a519f #35
[ 4.304092] Hardware name: Renesas Salvator-X 2nd version board based on r8a77965 (DT)
[ 4.304097] Workqueue: async async_run_entry_fn
[ 4.304106] Call trace:
[ 4.304110] show_stack+0x14/0x20 (C)
[ 4.304122] dump_stack_lvl+0x6c/0x90
[ 4.304131] dump_stack+0x14/0x1c
[ 4.304138] __lock_acquire+0xdfc/0x1584
[ 4.426274] lock_acquire+0x1c4/0x33c
[ 4.429942] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x5c/0x80
[ 4.434307] gpio_rcar_config_interrupt_input_mode+0x34/0x164
[ 4.440061] gpio_rcar_irq_set_type+0xd4/0xd8
[ 4.444422] __irq_set_trigger+0x5c/0x178
[ 4.448435] __setup_irq+0x2e4/0x690
[ 4.452012] request_threaded_irq+0xc4/0x190
[ 4.456285] devm_request_threaded_irq+0x7c/0xf4
[ 4.459398] ata1: link resume succeeded after 1 retries
[ 4.460902] mmc_gpiod_request_cd_irq+0x68/0xe0
[ 4.470660] mmc_start_host+0x50/0xac
[ 4.474327] mmc_add_host+0x80/0xe4
[ 4.477817] tmio_mmc_host_probe+0x2b0/0x440
[ 4.482094] renesas_sdhi_probe+0x488/0x6f4
[ 4.486281] renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac_probe+0x60/0x78
[ 4.491509] platform_probe+0x64/0xd8
[ 4.495178] really_probe+0xb8/0x2a8
[ 4.498756] __driver_probe_device+0x74/0x118
[ 4.503116] driver_probe_device+0x3c/0x154
[ 4.507303] __device_attach_driver+0xd4/0x160
[ 4.511750] bus_for_each_drv+0x84/0xe0
[ 4.515588] __device_attach_async_helper+0xb0/0xdc
[ 4.520470] async_run_entry_fn+0x30/0xd8
[ 4.524481] process_one_work+0x210/0x62c
[ 4.528494] worker_thread+0x1ac/0x340
[ 4.532245] kthread+0x10c/0x110
[ 4.535476] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250121135833.3769310-1-niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
rodrigovivi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 3, 2025
…cal section
A circular lock dependency splat has been seen involving down_trylock():
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.12.0-41.el10.s390x+debug
------------------------------------------------------
dd/32479 is trying to acquire lock:
0015a20accd0d4f8 ((console_sem).lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: down_trylock+0x26/0x90
but task is already holding lock:
000000017e461698 (&zone->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: rmqueue_bulk+0xac/0x8f0
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #4 (&zone->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}:
-> #3 (hrtimer_bases.lock){-.-.}-{2:2}:
-> #2 (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2}:
-> #1 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}-{2:2}:
-> #0 ((console_sem).lock){-.-.}-{2:2}:
The console_sem -> pi_lock dependency is due to calling try_to_wake_up()
while holding the console_sem raw_spinlock. This dependency can be broken
by using wake_q to do the wakeup instead of calling try_to_wake_up()
under the console_sem lock. This will also make the semaphore's
raw_spinlock become a terminal lock without taking any further locks
underneath it.
The hrtimer_bases.lock is a raw_spinlock while zone->lock is a
spinlock. The hrtimer_bases.lock -> zone->lock dependency happens via
the debug_objects_fill_pool() helper function in the debugobjects code.
-> #4 (&zone->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}:
__lock_acquire+0xe86/0x1cc0
lock_acquire.part.0+0x258/0x630
lock_acquire+0xb8/0xe0
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xb4/0x120
rmqueue_bulk+0xac/0x8f0
__rmqueue_pcplist+0x580/0x830
rmqueue_pcplist+0xfc/0x470
rmqueue.isra.0+0xdec/0x11b0
get_page_from_freelist+0x2ee/0xeb0
__alloc_pages_noprof+0x2c2/0x520
alloc_pages_mpol_noprof+0x1fc/0x4d0
alloc_pages_noprof+0x8c/0xe0
allocate_slab+0x320/0x460
___slab_alloc+0xa58/0x12b0
__slab_alloc.isra.0+0x42/0x60
kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x304/0x350
fill_pool+0xf6/0x450
debug_object_activate+0xfe/0x360
enqueue_hrtimer+0x34/0x190
__run_hrtimer+0x3c8/0x4c0
__hrtimer_run_queues+0x1b2/0x260
hrtimer_interrupt+0x316/0x760
do_IRQ+0x9a/0xe0
do_irq_async+0xf6/0x160
Normally a raw_spinlock to spinlock dependency is not legitimate
and will be warned if CONFIG_PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING is enabled,
but debug_objects_fill_pool() is an exception as it explicitly
allows this dependency for non-PREEMPT_RT kernel without causing
PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING lockdep splat. As a result, this dependency is
legitimate and not a bug.
Anyway, semaphore is the only locking primitive left that is still
using try_to_wake_up() to do wakeup inside critical section, all the
other locking primitives had been migrated to use wake_q to do wakeup
outside of the critical section. It is also possible that there are
other circular locking dependencies involving printk/console_sem or
other existing/new semaphores lurking somewhere which may show up in
the future. Let just do the migration now to wake_q to avoid headache
like this.
Reported-by: yzbot+ed801a886dfdbfe7136d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250307232717.1759087-3-boqun.feng@gmail.com
rodrigovivi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 3, 2025
into HEAD KVM x86 fixes for 6.14-rcN #2 - Set RFLAGS.IF in C code on SVM to get VMRUN out of the STI shadow. - Ensure DEBUGCTL is context switched on AMD to avoid running the guest with the host's value, which can lead to unexpected bus lock #DBs. - Suppress DEBUGCTL.BTF on AMD (to match Intel), as KVM doesn't properly emulate BTF. KVM's lack of context switching has meant BTF has always been broken to some extent. - Always save DR masks for SNP vCPUs if DebugSwap is *supported*, as the guest can enable DebugSwap without KVM's knowledge. - Fix a bug in mmu_stress_tests where a vCPU could finish the "writes to RO memory" phase without actually generating a write-protection fault. - Fix a printf() goof in the SEV smoke test that causes build failures with -Werror. - Explicitly zero EAX and EBX in CPUID.0x8000_0022 output when PERFMON_V2 isn't supported by KVM.
rodrigovivi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 3, 2025
…rg/drm/i915/kernel into drm-next drm/i915 feature pull #2 for v6.15: Features and functionality: - FBC dirty rectangle support for display version 30+ (Vinod) - Update plane scalers via DSB based commits (Ville) - Move runtime power status info to display power debugfs (Jani) Refactoring and cleanups: - Convert i915 and xe to DRM client setup (Thomas) - Refactor and clean up CDCLK/bw/dbuf readout/sanitation (Ville) - Conversions from drm_i915_private to struct intel_display (Jani, Suraj) - Refactor display reset for better separation between display and core (Jani) - Move panel fitter code together (Jani) - Add mst and hdcp sub-structs to display structs for clarity (Jani) - Header refactoring to clarify separation between display and i915 core (Jani) Fixes: - Fix DP MST max stream count to match number of pipes (Jani) - Fix encoder HW state readout of DP MST UHBR (Imre) - Fix ICL+ combo PHY cursor and coeff polarity programming (Ville) - Fix pipeDMC and ATS fault handling (Ville) - Display workarounds (Gustavo) - Remove duplicate forward declaration (Vinod) - Improve POWER_DOMAIN_*() macro type safety (Gustavo) - Move CDCLK post plane programming later (Ville) DRM core changes: - Add client-hotplug helper (Thomas) - Send pending hotplug events after client resume (Thomas) - Add fb_restore and fb_set_suspend fb helper hooks (Thomas) - Remove struct fb_probe fb helper hook (Thomas) - Add const qualifier to drm_atomic_helper_damage_merged() (Vinod) Xe driver changes: - Convert i915 and xe to DRM client setup (Thomas) - Refactor i915 compat headers (Jani) - Fix fbdev GGTT mapping handling (Maarten) - Figure out pxp instance from the gem object (Jani) Merges: - Backmerge drm-next to fix conflicts with drm-xe-next (Jani) Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/87o6y9gpub.fsf@intel.com
rodrigovivi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 3, 2025
A blocking notification chain uses a read-write semaphore to protect the integrity of the chain. The semaphore is acquired for writing when adding / removing notifiers to / from the chain and acquired for reading when traversing the chain and informing notifiers about an event. In case of the blocking switchdev notification chain, recursive notifications are possible which leads to the semaphore being acquired twice for reading and to lockdep warnings being generated [1]. Specifically, this can happen when the bridge driver processes a SWITCHDEV_BRPORT_UNOFFLOADED event which causes it to emit notifications about deferred events when calling switchdev_deferred_process(). Fix this by converting the notification chain to a raw notification chain in a similar fashion to the netdev notification chain. Protect the chain using the RTNL mutex by acquiring it when modifying the chain. Events are always informed under the RTNL mutex, but add an assertion in call_switchdev_blocking_notifiers() to make sure this is not violated in the future. Maintain the "blocking" prefix as events are always emitted from process context and listeners are allowed to block. [1]: WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.14.0-rc4-custom-g079270089484 #1 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- ip/52731 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffff850918d8 ((switchdev_blocking_notif_chain).rwsem){++++}-{4:4}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x58/0xa0 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff850918d8 ((switchdev_blocking_notif_chain).rwsem){++++}-{4:4}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x58/0xa0 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock((switchdev_blocking_notif_chain).rwsem); lock((switchdev_blocking_notif_chain).rwsem); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 3 locks held by ip/52731: #0: ffffffff84f795b0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rtnl_newlink+0x727/0x1dc0 #1: ffffffff8731f628 (&net->rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rtnl_newlink+0x790/0x1dc0 #2: ffffffff850918d8 ((switchdev_blocking_notif_chain).rwsem){++++}-{4:4}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x58/0xa0 stack backtrace: ... ? __pfx_down_read+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_mark_lock+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_switchdev_port_attr_set_deferred+0x10/0x10 blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x58/0xa0 switchdev_port_attr_notify.constprop.0+0xb3/0x1b0 ? __pfx_switchdev_port_attr_notify.constprop.0+0x10/0x10 ? mark_held_locks+0x94/0xe0 ? switchdev_deferred_process+0x11a/0x340 switchdev_port_attr_set_deferred+0x27/0xd0 switchdev_deferred_process+0x164/0x340 br_switchdev_port_unoffload+0xc8/0x100 [bridge] br_switchdev_blocking_event+0x29f/0x580 [bridge] notifier_call_chain+0xa2/0x440 blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x6e/0xa0 switchdev_bridge_port_unoffload+0xde/0x1a0 ... Fixes: f7a70d6 ("net: bridge: switchdev: Ensure deferred event delivery on unoffload") Signed-off-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Tested-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250305121509.631207-1-amcohen@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
rodrigovivi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 3, 2025
When on a MANA VM hibernation is triggered, as part of hibernate_snapshot(), mana_gd_suspend() and mana_gd_resume() are called. If during this mana_gd_resume(), a failure occurs with HWC creation, mana_port_debugfs pointer does not get reinitialized and ends up pointing to older, cleaned-up dentry. Further in the hibernation path, as part of power_down(), mana_gd_shutdown() is triggered. This call, unaware of the failures in resume, tries to cleanup the already cleaned up mana_port_debugfs value and hits the following bug: [ 191.359296] mana 7870:00:00.0: Shutdown was called [ 191.359918] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000098 [ 191.360584] #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode [ 191.361125] #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page [ 191.361727] PGD 1080ea067 P4D 0 [ 191.362172] Oops: Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP NOPTI [ 191.362606] CPU: 11 UID: 0 PID: 1674 Comm: bash Not tainted 6.14.0-rc5+ #2 [ 191.363292] Hardware name: Microsoft Corporation Virtual Machine/Virtual Machine, BIOS Hyper-V UEFI Release v4.1 11/21/2024 [ 191.364124] RIP: 0010:down_write+0x19/0x50 [ 191.364537] Code: 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 48 89 e5 53 48 89 fb e8 de cd ff ff 31 c0 ba 01 00 00 00 <f0> 48 0f b1 13 75 16 65 48 8b 05 88 24 4c 6a 48 89 43 08 48 8b 5d [ 191.365867] RSP: 0000:ff45fbe0c1c037b8 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 191.366350] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000098 RCX: ffffff8100000000 [ 191.366951] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000064 RDI: 0000000000000098 [ 191.367600] RBP: ff45fbe0c1c037c0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001 [ 191.368225] R10: ff45fbe0d2b01000 R11: 0000000000000008 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 191.368874] R13: 000000000000000b R14: ff43dc27509d67c0 R15: 0000000000000020 [ 191.369549] FS: 00007dbc5001e740(0000) GS:ff43dc663f380000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 191.370213] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 191.370830] CR2: 0000000000000098 CR3: 0000000168e8e002 CR4: 0000000000b73ef0 [ 191.371557] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 191.372192] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe07f0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 191.372906] Call Trace: [ 191.373262] <TASK> [ 191.373621] ? show_regs+0x64/0x70 [ 191.374040] ? __die+0x24/0x70 [ 191.374468] ? page_fault_oops+0x290/0x5b0 [ 191.374875] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x448/0x800 [ 191.375357] ? exc_page_fault+0x7a/0x160 [ 191.375971] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x27/0x30 [ 191.376416] ? down_write+0x19/0x50 [ 191.376832] ? down_write+0x12/0x50 [ 191.377232] simple_recursive_removal+0x4a/0x2a0 [ 191.377679] ? __pfx_remove_one+0x10/0x10 [ 191.378088] debugfs_remove+0x44/0x70 [ 191.378530] mana_detach+0x17c/0x4f0 [ 191.378950] ? __flush_work+0x1e2/0x3b0 [ 191.379362] ? __cond_resched+0x1a/0x50 [ 191.379787] mana_remove+0xf2/0x1a0 [ 191.380193] mana_gd_shutdown+0x3b/0x70 [ 191.380642] pci_device_shutdown+0x3a/0x80 [ 191.381063] device_shutdown+0x13e/0x230 [ 191.381480] kernel_power_off+0x35/0x80 [ 191.381890] hibernate+0x3c6/0x470 [ 191.382312] state_store+0xcb/0xd0 [ 191.382734] kobj_attr_store+0x12/0x30 [ 191.383211] sysfs_kf_write+0x3e/0x50 [ 191.383640] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x140/0x1d0 [ 191.384106] vfs_write+0x271/0x440 [ 191.384521] ksys_write+0x72/0xf0 [ 191.384924] __x64_sys_write+0x19/0x20 [ 191.385313] x64_sys_call+0x2b0/0x20b0 [ 191.385736] do_syscall_64+0x79/0x150 [ 191.386146] ? __mod_memcg_lruvec_state+0xe7/0x240 [ 191.386676] ? __lruvec_stat_mod_folio+0x79/0xb0 [ 191.387124] ? __pfx_lru_add+0x10/0x10 [ 191.387515] ? queued_spin_unlock+0x9/0x10 [ 191.387937] ? do_anonymous_page+0x33c/0xa00 [ 191.388374] ? __handle_mm_fault+0xcf3/0x1210 [ 191.388805] ? __count_memcg_events+0xbe/0x180 [ 191.389235] ? handle_mm_fault+0xae/0x300 [ 191.389588] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x559/0x800 [ 191.390027] ? irqentry_exit_to_user_mode+0x43/0x230 [ 191.390525] ? irqentry_exit+0x1d/0x30 [ 191.390879] ? exc_page_fault+0x86/0x160 [ 191.391235] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 191.391745] RIP: 0033:0x7dbc4ff1c574 [ 191.392111] Code: c7 00 16 00 00 00 b8 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 80 3d d5 ea 0e 00 00 74 13 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 54 c3 0f 1f 00 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 20 48 89 [ 191.393412] RSP: 002b:00007ffd95a23ab8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 [ 191.393990] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000005 RCX: 00007dbc4ff1c574 [ 191.394594] RDX: 0000000000000005 RSI: 00005a6eeadb0ce0 RDI: 0000000000000001 [ 191.395215] RBP: 00007ffd95a23ae0 R08: 00007dbc50003b20 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 191.395805] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000005 [ 191.396404] R13: 00005a6eeadb0ce0 R14: 00007dbc500045c0 R15: 00007dbc50001ee0 [ 191.396987] </TASK> To fix this, we explicitly set such mana debugfs variables to NULL after debugfs_remove() is called. Fixes: 6607c17 ("net: mana: Enable debugfs files for MANA device") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Shradha Gupta <shradhagupta@linux.microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Michal Kubiak <michal.kubiak@intel.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/1741688260-28922-1-git-send-email-shradhagupta@linux.microsoft.com Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
rodrigovivi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 3, 2025
We have recently seen report of lockdep circular lock dependency warnings on platforms like skykale and kabylake: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.14.0-rc6-CI_DRM_16276-gca2c04fe76e8+ #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ swapper/0/1 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffff8360ee48 (iommu_probe_device_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: iommu_probe_device+0x1d/0x70 but task is already holding lock: ffff888102c7efa8 (&device->physical_node_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: intel_iommu_init+0xe75/0x11f0 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #6 (&device->physical_node_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xb4/0xe40 mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 intel_iommu_init+0xe75/0x11f0 pci_iommu_init+0x13/0x70 do_one_initcall+0x62/0x3f0 kernel_init_freeable+0x3da/0x6a0 kernel_init+0x1b/0x200 ret_from_fork+0x44/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 -> #5 (dmar_global_lock){++++}-{3:3}: down_read+0x43/0x1d0 enable_drhd_fault_handling+0x21/0x110 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x4c6/0x870 cpuhp_issue_call+0xbf/0x1f0 __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x111/0x320 __cpuhp_setup_state+0xb0/0x220 irq_remap_enable_fault_handling+0x3f/0xa0 apic_intr_mode_init+0x5c/0x110 x86_late_time_init+0x24/0x40 start_kernel+0x895/0xbd0 x86_64_start_reservations+0x18/0x30 x86_64_start_kernel+0xbf/0x110 common_startup_64+0x13e/0x141 -> #4 (cpuhp_state_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xb4/0xe40 mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x67/0x320 __cpuhp_setup_state+0xb0/0x220 page_alloc_init_cpuhp+0x2d/0x60 mm_core_init+0x18/0x2c0 start_kernel+0x576/0xbd0 x86_64_start_reservations+0x18/0x30 x86_64_start_kernel+0xbf/0x110 common_startup_64+0x13e/0x141 -> #3 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}: __cpuhp_state_add_instance+0x4f/0x220 iova_domain_init_rcaches+0x214/0x280 iommu_setup_dma_ops+0x1a4/0x710 iommu_device_register+0x17d/0x260 intel_iommu_init+0xda4/0x11f0 pci_iommu_init+0x13/0x70 do_one_initcall+0x62/0x3f0 kernel_init_freeable+0x3da/0x6a0 kernel_init+0x1b/0x200 ret_from_fork+0x44/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 -> #2 (&domain->iova_cookie->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xb4/0xe40 mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 iommu_setup_dma_ops+0x16b/0x710 iommu_device_register+0x17d/0x260 intel_iommu_init+0xda4/0x11f0 pci_iommu_init+0x13/0x70 do_one_initcall+0x62/0x3f0 kernel_init_freeable+0x3da/0x6a0 kernel_init+0x1b/0x200 ret_from_fork+0x44/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 -> #1 (&group->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xb4/0xe40 mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 __iommu_probe_device+0x24c/0x4e0 probe_iommu_group+0x2b/0x50 bus_for_each_dev+0x7d/0xe0 iommu_device_register+0xe1/0x260 intel_iommu_init+0xda4/0x11f0 pci_iommu_init+0x13/0x70 do_one_initcall+0x62/0x3f0 kernel_init_freeable+0x3da/0x6a0 kernel_init+0x1b/0x200 ret_from_fork+0x44/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 -> #0 (iommu_probe_device_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1637/0x2810 lock_acquire+0xc9/0x300 __mutex_lock+0xb4/0xe40 mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 iommu_probe_device+0x1d/0x70 intel_iommu_init+0xe90/0x11f0 pci_iommu_init+0x13/0x70 do_one_initcall+0x62/0x3f0 kernel_init_freeable+0x3da/0x6a0 kernel_init+0x1b/0x200 ret_from_fork+0x44/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: iommu_probe_device_lock --> dmar_global_lock --> &device->physical_node_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&device->physical_node_lock); lock(dmar_global_lock); lock(&device->physical_node_lock); lock(iommu_probe_device_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** This driver uses a global lock to protect the list of enumerated DMA remapping units. It is necessary due to the driver's support for dynamic addition and removal of remapping units at runtime. Two distinct code paths require iteration over this remapping unit list: - Device registration and probing: the driver iterates the list to register each remapping unit with the upper layer IOMMU framework and subsequently probe the devices managed by that unit. - Global configuration: Upper layer components may also iterate the list to apply configuration changes. The lock acquisition order between these two code paths was reversed. This caused lockdep warnings, indicating a risk of deadlock. Fix this warning by releasing the global lock before invoking upper layer interfaces for device registration. Fixes: b150654 ("iommu/vt-d: Fix suspicious RCU usage") Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/SJ1PR11MB612953431F94F18C954C4A9CB9D32@SJ1PR11MB6129.namprd11.prod.outlook.com/ Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Chaitanya Kumar Borah <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com> [ for topic/core-for-CI only ] References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/13927 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250317035714.1041549-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
7 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Bumps requests from 2.31.0 to 2.32.0.
Release notes
Sourced from requests's releases.
... (truncated)
Changelog
Sourced from requests's changelog.
Commits
d6ebc4av2.32.09a40d12Avoid reloading root certificates to improve concurrent performance (#6667)0c030f7Merge pull request #6702 from nateprewitt/no_char_detection555b870Allow character detection dependencies to be optional in post-packaging stepsd6dded3Merge pull request #6700 from franekmagiera/update-redirect-to-invalid-uri-testbf24b7dUse an invalid URI that will not cause httpbin to throw 5002d5f547Pin 3.8 and 3.9 runners back to macos-13 (#6688)f1bb07dMerge pull request #6687 from psf/dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-act...60047adBump github/codeql-action from 3.24.0 to 3.25.031ebb81Merge pull request #6682 from frenzymadness/pytest8Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
@dependabot rebase.Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
@dependabot rebasewill rebase this PR@dependabot recreatewill recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it@dependabot mergewill merge this PR after your CI passes on it@dependabot squash and mergewill squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it@dependabot cancel mergewill cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging@dependabot reopenwill reopen this PR if it is closed@dependabot closewill close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditionswill show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency@dependabot ignore this major versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this minor versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this dependencywill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the Security Alerts page.