Skip to content

docs: enhance e-Waybill subcontracting details and settings explanation#70

Open
ljain112 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat-scio-e-waybill
Open

docs: enhance e-Waybill subcontracting details and settings explanation#70
ljain112 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat-scio-e-waybill

Conversation

@ljain112

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Two documentation files under pages/docs/ewaybill-and-einvoice/ are updated. A new section titled "e-Waybill for Subcontracting Inward" is inserted into generating_e_waybill.md, covering the prerequisite setting, supported Stock Entry purposes for principal and job worker roles, how customer-provided raw material value is surfaced as a read-only Additional Taxable Value field under Rule 55, and how Document Type and Sub Supply Type are determined. In gst_settings.md, the description for the "Enable e-Waybill Generation for Subcontracting" setting is reworded to mention both outward dispatch and inward return scenarios, and a link to the new section is added.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ❓ Inconclusive No pull request description was provided, making it impossible to assess relevance to the changeset. Add a pull request description explaining the purpose and scope of the documentation enhancements.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately reflects the main change: enhanced documentation for e-Waybill subcontracting details and settings.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1


ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 5ea4fae7-0665-46bc-a65c-75abcb55b54e

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 416acad and b7e65d5.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • pages/docs/ewaybill-and-einvoice/generating_e_waybill.md
  • pages/docs/ewaybill-and-einvoice/gst_settings.md


- **Enable e-Waybill Generation for Subcontracting**
Enable this setting to generate e-Waybills for the Subcontracting Workflow. When materials are dispatched to subcontractors for job work, generating e-Waybills becomes essential for compliance and tracking purposes.
Enable this setting to generate e-Waybills for the Subcontracting Workflow — both when you send materials to a subcontractor for job work and when you process materials for a customer (delivering finished goods or returning raw materials). See [e-Waybill for Subcontracting](generating_e_waybill#e-waybill-for-subcontracting) for details.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical | ⚡ Quick win

Anchor mismatch breaks cross-document navigation link.

The link in gst_settings.md line 62 points to #e-waybill-for-subcontracting, but the heading in generating_e_waybill.md line 168 is "## e-Waybill for Subcontracting Inward", which generates the anchor #e-waybill-for-subcontracting-inward. The mismatch prevents users from navigating via the link.

  • pages/docs/ewaybill-and-einvoice/gst_settings.md#L62-L62: update the anchor reference from #e-waybill-for-subcontracting to #e-waybill-for-subcontracting-inward to match the heading in generating_e_waybill.md.
🔗 Proposed fix
- See [e-Waybill for Subcontracting](generating_e_waybill#e-waybill-for-subcontracting) for details.
+ See [e-Waybill for Subcontracting](generating_e_waybill#e-waybill-for-subcontracting-inward) for details.
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
Enable this setting to generate e-Waybills for the Subcontracting Workflow — both when you send materials to a subcontractor for job work and when you process materials for a customer (delivering finished goods or returning raw materials). See [e-Waybill for Subcontracting](generating_e_waybill#e-waybill-for-subcontracting) for details.
Enable this setting to generate e-Waybills for the Subcontracting Workflow — both when you send materials to a subcontractor for job work and when you process materials for a customer (delivering finished goods or returning raw materials). See [e-Waybill for Subcontracting](generating_e_waybill#e-waybill-for-subcontracting-inward) for details.
📍 Affects 2 files
  • pages/docs/ewaybill-and-einvoice/gst_settings.md#L62-L62 (this comment)
  • pages/docs/ewaybill-and-einvoice/generating_e_waybill.md#L168-L168

@codacy-production

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant