ci(claude): bump claude-code reviewer to public-workflows v2.11.3#95
Conversation
Aligns the Claude reviewer pin with codex/gemini (already on v2.11.3). v2.11.3 -> commit 3fb9ffbace86c9e93a7b92170241dd54b5031608; the claude-code.yml workflow_call interface is unchanged (inputs prompt/require_tests/max_turns optional, only ANTHROPIC_API_KEY required), so this is a no-break pin advance. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 44 minutes and 54 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file). ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Claude Review
Critical issues
None. This is a one-line change advancing the claude-code.yml reusable-workflow pin from a SHA tagged v2.9.3 to one tagged v2.11.3. The pin uses a full 40-char commit SHA (supply-chain best practice) and the workflow_call contract (optional prompt/require_tests/max_turns, required ANTHROPIC_API_KEY) is unchanged, so the caller still satisfies it.
Security
- The referenced commit
3fb9ffbace86c9e93a7b92170241dd54b5031608could not be independently verified against thev2.11.3tag inpraetorian-inc/public-workflowsfrom this review environment — worth a manual confirmation that the SHA truly belongs to that tag before merge, since this workflow runs withcontents: write/pull-requests: write. - No new secrets, network calls, or permission-scope changes are introduced.
Test coverage
N/A — CI config only, no *.go production code changed.
No critical issues — LGTM pending human verification of the SHA→tag mapping.
1 participant
Bumps the Claude PR Assistant reviewer pin from
public-workflowsto v2.11.3, realigning it with the codex/gemini reviewers (already on v2.11.3).Safety: v2.11.3 dereferences to commit
3fb9ffbace86c9e93a7b92170241dd54b5031608. The reusable'sworkflow_callinterface is unchanged from the prior pin — inputs (prompt/require_tests/max_turns) are optional and the only required secret isANTHROPIC_API_KEY, which this caller already passes. No-break pin advance.Part of an org-wide reviewer-pin alignment sweep.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code