PLFA 2025 10 27: change how eval is defined#1141
Conversation
|
I see there are some issues above but I'm not sure what's causing them. @wenkokke, can you please sort it out, or if not let me know what I should do? |
|
@wenkokke I can see that all of the checks are failing with various issues, but they seem unrelated to the code changed in the pull request. What is the next step? |
|
@wenkokke I can see there is an option to "update branch" to merge in more recent changes from dev, which you've already done once. I guess there are now more recent changes. Can you merge them again? Will that fix the issues? |
Given that those same checks succeed on HEAD, I would assume it's something that is related to the changes in this PR, but I might be wrong. |
|
Hey, @wenkokke this pull request has been stuck for months now. Any suggestions on what I should do to get it unstuck? |
wenkokke
force-pushed
the
plfa-2025-10-27
branch
2 times, most recently
from
f07ae8b to
a2d580c
Compare
wenkokke
force-pushed
the
plfa-2025-10-27
branch
from
a2d580c to
b53ea71
Compare
|
@wadler This appears to be a bug in the HTML parser that I'm using where the use of |
Following a suggestion of Conrad Watt, changed the definition of `eval` to add information. Recall that the evaluator takes an amount of gas and a term and returns a reduction sequence. If the evaluator runs out of gas it returns a sequence of length equal to the amount of gas, while if it terminates in returns a sequence of length less than the amount of gas and ending in a value. --------- Co-authored-by: Wen Kokke <wenkokke@users.noreply.github.com>
2 participants
Following a suggestion of Conrad Watt, changed the definition of
evalto add information. Recall that the evaluator takes an amount of gas and a term and returns a reduction sequence. If the evaluator runs out of gas it returns a sequence of length equal to the amount of gas, while if it terminates in returns a sequence of length less than the amount of gas and ending in a value.