cluster: support tikv-worker

[Lloyd-Pottiger]

What problem does this PR solve?

close #xxx

What is changed and how it works?

Support tikv-worker in TiUP Cluster.

sudo ./tiup/bin/tiup-cluster deploy qy-columnar-test v8.5.4-nextgen.202510.0 ./topo/columnar.topo.yaml --ignore-config-check --yes

sudo ./tiup/bin/tiup-cluster patch qy-columnar-test cse-package/tidb-nightly-linux-amd64.tar.gz -R tidb --offline  --yes
sudo ./tiup/bin/tiup-cluster patch qy-columnar-test cse-package/tikv-nightly-linux-amd64.tar.gz -R tikv --offline  --yes
sudo ./tiup/bin/tiup-cluster patch qy-columnar-test cse-package/tiflash-nightly-linux-amd64.tar.gz -R tiflash --offline  --yes
sudo ./tiup/bin/tiup-cluster patch qy-columnar-test cse-package/pd-nightly-linux-amd64.tar.gz -R pd --offline  --yes
sudo ./tiup/bin/tiup-cluster patch qy-columnar-test cse-package/tikv-worker-nightly-linux-amd64.tar.gz -R tikv-worker --offline  --yes

sudo ./tiup/bin/tiup-cluster start qy-columnar-test --yes

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
• No code

Code changes

• Has exported function/method change
• Has exported variable/fields change
• Has interface methods change
• Has persistent data change

Side effects

• Possible performance regression
• Increased code complexity
• Breaking backward compatibility

Related changes

• Need to cherry-pick to the release branch
• Need to update the documentation

Release notes:

NONE

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign bb7133 for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.
Please ensure that each of them provides their approval before proceeding.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign bb7133 for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.
Please ensure that each of them provides their approval before proceeding.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 6.66667% with 154 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 42.15%. Comparing base (7d025cb) to head (402a50f).
⚠️ Report is 18 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
pkg/cluster/spec/tikv_worker.go	6.36%	102 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
pkg/cluster/template/scripts/tikv_worker.go	0.00%	12 Missing ⚠️
pkg/cluster/manager/patch.go	0.00%	10 Missing ⚠️
pkg/cluster/task/download.go	0.00%	9 Missing ⚠️
pkg/cluster/task/update_meta.go	0.00%	6 Missing ⚠️
pkg/cluster/spec/monitoring.go	0.00%	5 Missing ⚠️
pkg/cluster/task/copy_component.go	0.00%	5 Missing ⚠️
pkg/cluster/template/config/prometheus.go	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
pkg/cluster/spec/spec.go	75.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2677      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   42.30%   42.15%   -0.15%     
==========================================
  Files         424      426       +2     
  Lines       46888    47044     +156     
==========================================
- Hits        19834    19829       -5     
- Misses      24390    24550     +160     
- Partials     2664     2665       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[Lloyd-Pottiger]

/cc @xhebox @breezewish

[xhebox]

  // For some repos (e.g. internal ones), tikv-worker can be packaged as anextra binary inside the `tikv` component. Prefer checking with  `bin/tikv-worker` when it exists, otherwise fall back to the component's default entry.

The comment is true. Isn't this break that behavior?

[Lloyd-Pottiger]

  // For some repos (e.g. internal ones), tikv-worker can be packaged as anextra binary inside the `tikv` component. Prefer checking with  `bin/tikv-worker` when it exists, otherwise fall back to the component's default entry.

The comment is true. Isn't this break that behavior?

http://tiup.pingcap.net:8988/ tikv-worker is an independent package.

[xhebox]

The comment is true. Isn't this break that behavior?

http://tiup.pingcap.net:8988/ tikv-worker is an independent package.

It is. But in some old packages, it is not.

[JaySon-Huang]

some comments about upgrade order