content: publish latest to production (src/content → peanut-content@f3c0ef6)

[0xkkonrad]

Bumps src/content on production (main) from 76ca37a → f3c0ef6 (peanut-content latest = mono@bd0ec2f). Single-file submodule pointer change publishing content already merged to mono. The automated update-content PRs reach this same pointer but target dev, which never promotes.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
peanut-wallet	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jul 11, 2026 9:38am

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 477a7f95-b571-4e53-b917-78614a8a9b25

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dc29b19 and 25864d7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/content

---

Walkthrough

The src/content subproject pointer is updated from one commit hash to another. No application logic or exported declarations change.

Changes

Content submodule update

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Update content revision src/content	Updates the tracked src/content subproject commit pointer.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#2167: Updates the same src/content submodule reference.
• peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#2176: Bumps only the src/content submodule commit.
• peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#2239: Updates the pinned src/content commit hash.

Suggested labels: enhancement

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately summarizes the main change: publishing the src/content submodule pointer to production.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description is directly related to the submodule bump and explains the production promotion intent.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[github-actions]

Code-analysis diff

Painscore total: 6098.17 → 6098.17 (0)
Findings: 0 net (+0 new, -0 resolved)

[github-actions]

🧪 UI test report — ✅ all green

Suites

• ✅ unit: 1817 ran, 0 failed, 0 skipped, 26.8s

📊 Coverage (unit)

metric	%
statements	57.7%
branches	41.8%
functions	46.1%
lines	57.8%

⏱ 10 slowest test cases

time	test
3.5s	src/components/Card/share-asset/__tests__/shareAssetLayout.test.ts › never places two stickers in heavy overlap (broad seed sweep)
0.6s	src/components/Card/share-asset/__tests__/shareAssetLayout.test.ts › every sticker stays within canvas at any count
0.3s	src/app/actions/__tests__/api-headers.test.ts › should include Content-Type in updateUserById
0.3s	src/app/actions/__tests__/api-headers-extended.test.ts › should not include apiKey in updateUserById body
0.2s	src/components/Card/share-asset/__tests__/shareAssetLayout.test.ts › keeps stickers off the username pill (final pass respects the keep-out)
0.1s	src/components/Global/GeneralRecipientInput/__tests__/GeneralRecipientInput.test.tsx › should handle valid 9-digit US account
0.1s	src/components/Global/GeneralRecipientInput/__tests__/GeneralRecipientInput.test.tsx › should handle valid US account with spaces 2
0.1s	src/components/Global/GeneralRecipientInput/__tests__/GeneralRecipientInput.test.tsx › should handle unresolvable ENS name
0.1s	src/services/__tests__/resolveClaimLink.test.ts › restores the pristine password after a redirect mangles the fragment
0.1s	src/components/Global/GeneralRecipientInput/__tests__/GeneralRecipientInput.test.tsx › should handle valid ETH address

_{📍 Inline annotations are in the **Unit test report** check above. Coverage artifact: `coverage-unit`. Generated by `.github/workflows/tests.yml`.}