[codex] Handle missing IC50 values#307
Merged
Merged
Conversation
e890f3a to
d4a73ad
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Fixes #306.
This PR makes missing affinity IC50 values non-fatal in the two places that assumed every pMHC_affinity row had a numeric Prediction.value:
Root Cause
The IC50 sort path used min(p.value for p in affinity_leaves) directly, unlike the percentile-rank path which already filtered missing values. The report path then formatted mutant IC50 with %.2f nM unconditionally.
Validation