Skip to content

UPSTREAM: <carry>: Unhold network policy in the OLM bundle - #692

Open
mkowalski wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
mkowalski:netpol-olm-revert-the-revert
Open

UPSTREAM: <carry>: Unhold network policy in the OLM bundle#692
mkowalski wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
mkowalski:netpol-olm-revert-the-revert

Conversation

@mkowalski

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Revert #646. OLM should be good for network policies in the bundle.

@openshift-ci
openshift-ci Bot requested review from cybertron and phoracek November 7, 2025 16:53
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Nov 7, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mkowalski

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 7, 2025
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Nov 7, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@mkowalski: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@mkowalski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

/hold

OLM is still not happy about NPs in 4.21 bundle.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 18, 2025
@mkowalski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

/hold

OLM will not be happy about NPs in the bundle till February 1st, 2027

@openshift-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label May 6, 2026
@mkowalski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

/remove-lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label May 14, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants