Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Signed-off-by: Chris Burkert <burkert.chris@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Successfully fixed the Cedar policy engine architectural flaw by separating request configuration from engine state.
Problem Identified
The original implementation had a confusing and dangerous pattern:
Check()created a temporarycedarPolicyEngineinstanceWithSubject,WithAction,WithContextData) type-asserted and mutated the temporary engine's request fielde.policySetfrom the receiver andcpe.requestfrom the temporary engineWithResource) could silently read from the wrong engineSolution Implemented
Created a dedicated
requesttype for building authorization requests:Added
requesttype ininternal/policies/cedarpolicy/check.go:Engineinterface (required byCheckOptionsignature)Check()is called (fail-fast for misuse)principal,action,resource,contextUpdated option functions to type-assert to
*request:WithSubject: mutatesreq.principalinstead ofcpe.request.PrincipalWithAction: mutatesreq.actioninstead ofcpe.request.ActionWithContextData: mutatesreq.contextinstead ofcpe.request.ContextUpdated
Check()method:&request{}instead of temporary&cedarPolicyEngine{}cedar.Requestfrom the built requeste.policySetwith the properly-constructed requestRemoved unused field from
cedarPolicyEngine:request cedar.Requestfield (line 12 in engine.go)policySet— the persistent configuration