fix: updated syntax to match other filters

[holaontiveros]

Description

Previous InstructorDashboardTabsRequested filter didn't follow 100% the usual pattern of how the run_filter returned arguments, this updates that now the run_filter returns all the arguments that it received.

Supporting information

This originated on the conversation of this filter being implemented here: openedx/openedx-platform#38499 (comment)

Deadline

None

Other information

This is virtually the same as before, it only returns two more items in the tuple to match other run_filter patterns, nothing depends on it more than the code that goes will consume it that will algo be updated after this is merged.

Checklists

Check off if complete or not applicable:

Merge Checklist:

• All reviewers approved
• Reviewer tested the code following the testing instructions
• CI build is green
• Changelog entry added using scriv with short description of the change
• Documentation updated (not only docstrings)
• Code dependencies reviewed
• Fixup commits are squashed away
• Unit tests added/updated
• Noted any: Concerns, dependencies, migration issues, deadlines, tickets

Post Merge:

• Trigger the release workflow to create a new GitHub release.
• Check new version is pushed to PyPI after tag-triggered build is finished.
• Delete working branch (if not needed anymore)
• Upgrade the package in the Open edX platform requirements (if applicable)

[openedx-webhooks]

Thanks for the pull request, @holaontiveros!

This repository is currently maintained by @openedx/committers-openedx-filters.

Once you've gone through the following steps feel free to tag them in a comment and let them know that your changes are ready for engineering review.

🔘 Get product approval

If you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.

• If it does, you'll need to submit a product proposal for your contribution, and have it reviewed by the Product Working Group.
  • This process (including the steps you'll need to take) is documented here.
• If it doesn't, simply proceed with the next step.

🔘 Provide context

To help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:

• Dependencies

  This PR must be merged before / after / at the same time as ...

• Blockers

  This PR is waiting for OEP-1234 to be accepted.

• Timeline information

  This PR must be merged by XX date because ...

• Partner information

  This is for a course on edx.org.

• Supporting documentation
• Relevant Open edX discussion forum threads

🔘 Get a green build

If one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green.

Details

---

Where can I find more information?

If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:

• Overview of Review Process for Community Contributions
• Pull Request Status Guide
• Making changes to your pull request

When can I expect my changes to be merged?

Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible.

However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:

• The size and impact of the changes that it introduces
• The need for product review
• Maintenance status of the parent repository

💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

[wgu-taylor-payne]

This looks good to me. Just a couple of things to change in the changelog.

[bmtcril]

Looks good to me. Is the plan to backport this and the associated platform changes to Verawood?

[holaontiveros]

@bmtcril My plan was to to a backport in edx-platform that pointed to this new version, it loos compatible... does it some feasible to you? this is the backport PR openedx/openedx-platform#38663

Could you help me with the merge and relase please?

[felipemontoya]

Thanks @holaontiveros. This looks good and puts the filter back on track with the others.