Skip to content

Fix SherpaOnnx finalizer crash with DllNotFoundException#745

Open
williamwwm wants to merge 2 commits into
openclaw:mainfrom
williamwwm:main
Open

Fix SherpaOnnx finalizer crash with DllNotFoundException#745
williamwwm wants to merge 2 commits into
openclaw:mainfrom
williamwwm:main

Conversation

@williamwwm

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Suppress fatal crashes caused by SherpaOnnx.OfflineTts finalizer calling SherpaOnnxDestroyOfflineTts when native DLL is unavailable.

Changes:

  • PiperTextToSpeechClient: gracefully handle DllNotFoundException in constructor (TTS disabled gracefully), add GC.SuppressFinalize after dispose to prevent finalizer from calling native code during GC
  • App.xaml.cs: improved OnDomainUnhandledException logging for SherpaOnnx native DLL errors
  • Crash prevention relies on exe.config legacyUnhandledExceptionPolicy and GC.SuppressFinalize (IsTerminating is readonly in .NET 10)

Fixes repeated crashes: System.DllNotFoundException: Unable to load DLL 'sherpa-onnx-c-api' at SherpaOnnx.OfflineTts.Finalize()

Suppress fatal crashes caused by SherpaOnnx.OfflineTts finalizer
calling SherpaOnnxDestroyOfflineTts when native DLL is unavailable.

Changes:
- PiperTextToSpeechClient: gracefully handle DllNotFoundException
  in constructor (TTS disabled gracefully), add GC.SuppressFinalize
  after dispose to prevent finalizer from calling native code during GC
- App.xaml.cs: improved OnDomainUnhandledException logging for
  SherpaOnnx native DLL errors
- Crash prevention relies on exe.config legacyUnhandledExceptionPolicy
  and GC.SuppressFinalize (IsTerminating is readonly in .NET 10)

Fixes repeated crashes: System.DllNotFoundException: Unable to load
DLL 'sherpa-onnx-c-api' at SherpaOnnx.OfflineTts.Finalize()
# Conflicts:
#	src/OpenClaw.Tray.WinUI/App.xaml.cs
@clawsweeper

clawsweeper Bot commented Jun 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex review: needs real behavior proof before merge. Reviewed June 12, 2026, 6:31 PM ET / 22:31 UTC.

Summary
Review failed before ClawSweeper could summarize the requested change.

Reproducibility: unclear. The review failed before ClawSweeper could establish a reproduction path.

Review metrics: none identified.

Merge readiness
Overall: 🌊 off-meta tidepool
Proof: 🌊 off-meta tidepool
Patch quality: 🌊 off-meta tidepool
Result: rating does not apply to this item.

Overall follows the weaker of proof and patch quality, so missing proof can cap an otherwise strong patch.

Risk before merge

  • [P1] No close action taken because the review did not complete.

Maintainer options:

  1. Decide the mitigation before merge
    Retry the Codex review after fixing the execution failure.
  2. Pause or close
    Do not merge this PR until maintainers decide whether the risk is worth taking.

Next step before merge

  • [P1] Review did not complete, so no work-lane recommendation was made.
Review details

Best possible solution:

Retry the Codex review after fixing the execution failure.

Do we have a high-confidence way to reproduce the issue?

Unclear. The review failed before ClawSweeper could establish a reproduction path.

Is this the best way to solve the issue?

Unclear. Retry the review first so ClawSweeper can evaluate the actual issue and fix direction.

AGENTS.md: unclear because the file could not be read completely.

Codex review notes: model internal, reasoning high; reviewed against ebacf0c825f9.

Label changes

Label changes:

  • add rating: 🌊 off-meta tidepool: Overall readiness is 🌊 off-meta tidepool; proof is 🌊 off-meta tidepool and patch quality is 🌊 off-meta tidepool.

Label justifications:

  • rating: 🌊 off-meta tidepool: Overall readiness is 🌊 off-meta tidepool; proof is 🌊 off-meta tidepool and patch quality is 🌊 off-meta tidepool.
Evidence reviewed

What I checked:

Likely related people:

  • unknown: Codex failed before it could trace repository history. (role: review did not complete; confidence: low)
What the crustacean ranks mean
  • 🦀 challenger crab: rare, exceptional readiness with strong proof, clean implementation, and convincing validation.
  • 🦞 diamond lobster: very strong readiness with only minor maintainer review expected.
  • 🐚 platinum hermit: good normal PR, likely mergeable with ordinary maintainer review.
  • 🦐 gold shrimp: useful signal, but proof or patch confidence is still limited.
  • 🦪 silver shellfish: thin signal; proof, validation, or implementation needs work.
  • 🧂 unranked krab: not merge-ready because proof is missing/unusable or there are serious correctness or safety concerns.
  • 🌊 off-meta tidepool: rating does not apply to this item.

Shiny media proof means a screenshot, video, or linked artifact directly shows the changed behavior. Runtime, network, CSP, and security claims still need visible diagnostics.

How this review workflow works
  • ClawSweeper keeps one durable marker-backed review comment per issue or PR.
  • Re-runs edit this comment so the latest verdict, findings, and automation markers stay together instead of adding duplicate bot comments.
  • A fresh review can be triggered by eligible @clawsweeper re-review comments, exact-item GitHub events, scheduled/background review runs, or manual workflow dispatch.
  • PR/issue authors and users with repository write access can comment @clawsweeper re-review or @clawsweeper re-run on an open PR or issue to request a fresh review only.
  • Maintainers can also comment @clawsweeper review to request a fresh review only.
  • Fresh-review commands do not start repair, autofix, rebase, CI repair, or automerge.
  • Maintainer-only repair and merge flows require explicit commands such as @clawsweeper autofix, @clawsweeper automerge, @clawsweeper fix ci, or @clawsweeper address review.
  • Maintainers can comment @clawsweeper explain to ask for more context, or @clawsweeper stop to stop active automation.

@clawsweeper clawsweeper Bot added the rating: 🌊 off-meta tidepool PR readiness rating does not apply to this item. label Jun 12, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

rating: 🌊 off-meta tidepool PR readiness rating does not apply to this item.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants